2021 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

Summary From the Basic Life Support, Advanced Life Support, Neonatal Life Support, Education, Implementation, and Teams, First Aid Task Forces, the COVID-19 Working Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E645-E721
JournalCirculation
Volume145
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Keywords

  • AHA Scientific Statements
  • Advanced cardiac life support
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • First aid
  • Health plan implementation
  • Infant
  • Newborn

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '2021 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this