A comparison of clinical and structured interview diagnoses in a homeless mental health clinic

Carol S North, David E. Pollio, Sanna J. Thompson, Daniel A. Ricci, Elizabeth M. Smith, Edward L. Spitznagel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. This study compared psychiatric diagnoses ascertained by independent clinicians with structured research interviews of homeless psychiatric patients assessed in a mental health clinic and in the community. Problems of both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in structured research interviews compared to clinician assessment were predicted. Method. Over a period of a year, 97 patients referred to a mental health clinic for homeless people were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered by a clinical social worker who then completed a full clinical psychiatric social work assessment. These same patients received a thorough and systematic clinical psychiatric evaluation by a psychiatrist or psychologist, both experienced with this population. These clinicians gathered data from multiple sources, often with extended observation over time. The DIS and clinician diagnoses were made blind to one another and then compared; the clinician was often made aware of some of the symptoms that the social worker had elicited, but not whether the elicited material was from the DIS or from the clinical assessment. Diagnoses of 33 clinic patients previously assessed by trained nonclinician DIS interviews in an epidemiologic study of the homeless population in the community were also compared to clinician diagnoses, and no information from these patients' survey DIS interviews was made available to the clinicians. Results. Compared to clinician assessment, structured interviews underdiagnosed antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and overdiagnosed major depression. Alcohol use disorder and schizophrenia showed only small discrepancies by assessment method. Drug use disorder revealed no bias according to method of ascertainment, but showed very discrepant kappa levels comparing DIS to clinician assessment in the two different comparison contexts. Conclusions. If structured research methods assessing the homeless population actually overestimate depression, underestimate ASPD, and misclassify drug abuse, then policies stemming from structured interview research recommendations may call for levels and types of services not optimally suited to the reality of this population's needs. Because mental illness and substance abuse are thought to be critical factors in the generation and perpetuation of homelessness, the issue of accurate diagnosis is tantamount to understanding and providing workable solutions to the problem of homelessness. Further research is needed to untangle potential confounders of the homeless situation to psychiatric diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-542
Number of pages12
JournalCommunity Mental Health Journal
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Mental Health
mental health
Interviews
interview
Appointments and Schedules
diagnostic
Substance-Related Disorders
Psychiatry
Homeless Persons
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Research
personality disorder
homelessness
Mental Disorders
Population
social worker
Psychiatric Social Work
Depression
Information Storage and Retrieval
psychiatrist

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

A comparison of clinical and structured interview diagnoses in a homeless mental health clinic. / North, Carol S; Pollio, David E.; Thompson, Sanna J.; Ricci, Daniel A.; Smith, Elizabeth M.; Spitznagel, Edward L.

In: Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 33, No. 6, 1997, p. 531-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

North, Carol S ; Pollio, David E. ; Thompson, Sanna J. ; Ricci, Daniel A. ; Smith, Elizabeth M. ; Spitznagel, Edward L. / A comparison of clinical and structured interview diagnoses in a homeless mental health clinic. In: Community Mental Health Journal. 1997 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 531-542.
@article{5c907430d4e54bc1a47087fb39185680,
title = "A comparison of clinical and structured interview diagnoses in a homeless mental health clinic",
abstract = "Objective. This study compared psychiatric diagnoses ascertained by independent clinicians with structured research interviews of homeless psychiatric patients assessed in a mental health clinic and in the community. Problems of both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in structured research interviews compared to clinician assessment were predicted. Method. Over a period of a year, 97 patients referred to a mental health clinic for homeless people were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered by a clinical social worker who then completed a full clinical psychiatric social work assessment. These same patients received a thorough and systematic clinical psychiatric evaluation by a psychiatrist or psychologist, both experienced with this population. These clinicians gathered data from multiple sources, often with extended observation over time. The DIS and clinician diagnoses were made blind to one another and then compared; the clinician was often made aware of some of the symptoms that the social worker had elicited, but not whether the elicited material was from the DIS or from the clinical assessment. Diagnoses of 33 clinic patients previously assessed by trained nonclinician DIS interviews in an epidemiologic study of the homeless population in the community were also compared to clinician diagnoses, and no information from these patients' survey DIS interviews was made available to the clinicians. Results. Compared to clinician assessment, structured interviews underdiagnosed antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and overdiagnosed major depression. Alcohol use disorder and schizophrenia showed only small discrepancies by assessment method. Drug use disorder revealed no bias according to method of ascertainment, but showed very discrepant kappa levels comparing DIS to clinician assessment in the two different comparison contexts. Conclusions. If structured research methods assessing the homeless population actually overestimate depression, underestimate ASPD, and misclassify drug abuse, then policies stemming from structured interview research recommendations may call for levels and types of services not optimally suited to the reality of this population's needs. Because mental illness and substance abuse are thought to be critical factors in the generation and perpetuation of homelessness, the issue of accurate diagnosis is tantamount to understanding and providing workable solutions to the problem of homelessness. Further research is needed to untangle potential confounders of the homeless situation to psychiatric diagnosis.",
author = "North, {Carol S} and Pollio, {David E.} and Thompson, {Sanna J.} and Ricci, {Daniel A.} and Smith, {Elizabeth M.} and Spitznagel, {Edward L.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1023/A:1025052720325",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "531--542",
journal = "Community Mental Health Journal",
issn = "0010-3853",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of clinical and structured interview diagnoses in a homeless mental health clinic

AU - North, Carol S

AU - Pollio, David E.

AU - Thompson, Sanna J.

AU - Ricci, Daniel A.

AU - Smith, Elizabeth M.

AU - Spitznagel, Edward L.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objective. This study compared psychiatric diagnoses ascertained by independent clinicians with structured research interviews of homeless psychiatric patients assessed in a mental health clinic and in the community. Problems of both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in structured research interviews compared to clinician assessment were predicted. Method. Over a period of a year, 97 patients referred to a mental health clinic for homeless people were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered by a clinical social worker who then completed a full clinical psychiatric social work assessment. These same patients received a thorough and systematic clinical psychiatric evaluation by a psychiatrist or psychologist, both experienced with this population. These clinicians gathered data from multiple sources, often with extended observation over time. The DIS and clinician diagnoses were made blind to one another and then compared; the clinician was often made aware of some of the symptoms that the social worker had elicited, but not whether the elicited material was from the DIS or from the clinical assessment. Diagnoses of 33 clinic patients previously assessed by trained nonclinician DIS interviews in an epidemiologic study of the homeless population in the community were also compared to clinician diagnoses, and no information from these patients' survey DIS interviews was made available to the clinicians. Results. Compared to clinician assessment, structured interviews underdiagnosed antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and overdiagnosed major depression. Alcohol use disorder and schizophrenia showed only small discrepancies by assessment method. Drug use disorder revealed no bias according to method of ascertainment, but showed very discrepant kappa levels comparing DIS to clinician assessment in the two different comparison contexts. Conclusions. If structured research methods assessing the homeless population actually overestimate depression, underestimate ASPD, and misclassify drug abuse, then policies stemming from structured interview research recommendations may call for levels and types of services not optimally suited to the reality of this population's needs. Because mental illness and substance abuse are thought to be critical factors in the generation and perpetuation of homelessness, the issue of accurate diagnosis is tantamount to understanding and providing workable solutions to the problem of homelessness. Further research is needed to untangle potential confounders of the homeless situation to psychiatric diagnosis.

AB - Objective. This study compared psychiatric diagnoses ascertained by independent clinicians with structured research interviews of homeless psychiatric patients assessed in a mental health clinic and in the community. Problems of both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis in structured research interviews compared to clinician assessment were predicted. Method. Over a period of a year, 97 patients referred to a mental health clinic for homeless people were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) administered by a clinical social worker who then completed a full clinical psychiatric social work assessment. These same patients received a thorough and systematic clinical psychiatric evaluation by a psychiatrist or psychologist, both experienced with this population. These clinicians gathered data from multiple sources, often with extended observation over time. The DIS and clinician diagnoses were made blind to one another and then compared; the clinician was often made aware of some of the symptoms that the social worker had elicited, but not whether the elicited material was from the DIS or from the clinical assessment. Diagnoses of 33 clinic patients previously assessed by trained nonclinician DIS interviews in an epidemiologic study of the homeless population in the community were also compared to clinician diagnoses, and no information from these patients' survey DIS interviews was made available to the clinicians. Results. Compared to clinician assessment, structured interviews underdiagnosed antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and overdiagnosed major depression. Alcohol use disorder and schizophrenia showed only small discrepancies by assessment method. Drug use disorder revealed no bias according to method of ascertainment, but showed very discrepant kappa levels comparing DIS to clinician assessment in the two different comparison contexts. Conclusions. If structured research methods assessing the homeless population actually overestimate depression, underestimate ASPD, and misclassify drug abuse, then policies stemming from structured interview research recommendations may call for levels and types of services not optimally suited to the reality of this population's needs. Because mental illness and substance abuse are thought to be critical factors in the generation and perpetuation of homelessness, the issue of accurate diagnosis is tantamount to understanding and providing workable solutions to the problem of homelessness. Further research is needed to untangle potential confounders of the homeless situation to psychiatric diagnosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031445577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031445577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1025052720325

DO - 10.1023/A:1025052720325

M3 - Article

C2 - 9435999

AN - SCOPUS:0031445577

VL - 33

SP - 531

EP - 542

JO - Community Mental Health Journal

JF - Community Mental Health Journal

SN - 0010-3853

IS - 6

ER -