A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender

Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, Shannon A. Scielzo, Charyl S. Yarbrough, Patrick J. Rosopa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study compared the relative impact of peer-mentoring that took place either face-to-face or through electronic chat. Protégés were 106 college freshmen randomly assigned to a senior college student mentor and to one of the two communication modes. Fifty-one mentors interacted with one of these proteges face-to-face and one solely through electronic chat. Electronic chat resulted in less psychosocial support, career support, and post-mentoring protege self-efficacy for those with male but not female mentors. Analyses of coded transcripts revealed that males condensed their language to a greater extent than did females in the electronic chat condition relative to the face-to-face condition. Dyads in the electronic chat condition had more interactive dialogue than did those in the face-to-face condition. Finally, dialogue interactivity predicted post-mentoring self-efficacy but only for those who communicated through electronic chat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-206
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Vocational Behavior
Volume72
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008

Fingerprint

Mentors
chat
mentoring
electronics
Self Efficacy
gender
interaction
self-efficacy
Language
dialogue
Communication
Students
psychosocial care
interactive media
dyad
Mentoring
Interaction
Peers
Mentor
career

Keywords

  • Electronic communication
  • Formal mentoring
  • Gender effects
  • Peer-mentoring
  • Self-efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring : Interactions with mentor gender. / Smith-Jentsch, Kimberly A.; Scielzo, Shannon A.; Yarbrough, Charyl S.; Rosopa, Patrick J.

In: Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 72, No. 2, 01.04.2008, p. 193-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith-Jentsch, Kimberly A. ; Scielzo, Shannon A. ; Yarbrough, Charyl S. ; Rosopa, Patrick J. / A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring : Interactions with mentor gender. In: Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2008 ; Vol. 72, No. 2. pp. 193-206.
@article{27f7283f99904d00b88c73050f5483ac,
title = "A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender",
abstract = "The present study compared the relative impact of peer-mentoring that took place either face-to-face or through electronic chat. Prot{\'e}g{\'e}s were 106 college freshmen randomly assigned to a senior college student mentor and to one of the two communication modes. Fifty-one mentors interacted with one of these proteges face-to-face and one solely through electronic chat. Electronic chat resulted in less psychosocial support, career support, and post-mentoring protege self-efficacy for those with male but not female mentors. Analyses of coded transcripts revealed that males condensed their language to a greater extent than did females in the electronic chat condition relative to the face-to-face condition. Dyads in the electronic chat condition had more interactive dialogue than did those in the face-to-face condition. Finally, dialogue interactivity predicted post-mentoring self-efficacy but only for those who communicated through electronic chat.",
keywords = "Electronic communication, Formal mentoring, Gender effects, Peer-mentoring, Self-efficacy",
author = "Smith-Jentsch, {Kimberly A.} and Scielzo, {Shannon A.} and Yarbrough, {Charyl S.} and Rosopa, {Patrick J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "193--206",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Behavior",
issn = "0001-8791",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring

T2 - Interactions with mentor gender

AU - Smith-Jentsch, Kimberly A.

AU - Scielzo, Shannon A.

AU - Yarbrough, Charyl S.

AU - Rosopa, Patrick J.

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - The present study compared the relative impact of peer-mentoring that took place either face-to-face or through electronic chat. Protégés were 106 college freshmen randomly assigned to a senior college student mentor and to one of the two communication modes. Fifty-one mentors interacted with one of these proteges face-to-face and one solely through electronic chat. Electronic chat resulted in less psychosocial support, career support, and post-mentoring protege self-efficacy for those with male but not female mentors. Analyses of coded transcripts revealed that males condensed their language to a greater extent than did females in the electronic chat condition relative to the face-to-face condition. Dyads in the electronic chat condition had more interactive dialogue than did those in the face-to-face condition. Finally, dialogue interactivity predicted post-mentoring self-efficacy but only for those who communicated through electronic chat.

AB - The present study compared the relative impact of peer-mentoring that took place either face-to-face or through electronic chat. Protégés were 106 college freshmen randomly assigned to a senior college student mentor and to one of the two communication modes. Fifty-one mentors interacted with one of these proteges face-to-face and one solely through electronic chat. Electronic chat resulted in less psychosocial support, career support, and post-mentoring protege self-efficacy for those with male but not female mentors. Analyses of coded transcripts revealed that males condensed their language to a greater extent than did females in the electronic chat condition relative to the face-to-face condition. Dyads in the electronic chat condition had more interactive dialogue than did those in the face-to-face condition. Finally, dialogue interactivity predicted post-mentoring self-efficacy but only for those who communicated through electronic chat.

KW - Electronic communication

KW - Formal mentoring

KW - Gender effects

KW - Peer-mentoring

KW - Self-efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40749141023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40749141023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:40749141023

VL - 72

SP - 193

EP - 206

JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior

JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior

SN - 0001-8791

IS - 2

ER -