A comparison of film and computer workstation measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability

Michael J. Bolesta, Lauren Winslow, Kevin Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN. A comparison of measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis made on film and on computer workstations. OBJECTIVE. To determine whether the 2 methodologies are comparable in some of the parameters used to assess lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Digital radiology has been replacing analog radiographs. In scoliosis, several studies have shown that measurements made on digital and analog films are similar and that they are also similar to those made on computer workstations. Such work has not been done in spondylolisthesis. METHODS. Twenty-four cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were identified from our clinic practice. Three observers measured anterior displacement, sagittal rotation, and lumbar lordosis on digital films using the same protractor and pencil. The same parameters were measured on the same studies at clinical workstations. All measurements were repeated 2 weeks later. A statistician determined the intra and interobserver reliability of the 2 measurement methods and the degree of agreement between the 2 methods. RESULTS. The differences between the first and second readings did reach statistical significance in some cases, but none of them were large enough to be clinically meaningful. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥0.80 except for one (0.67). The difference among the 3 observers was similarly statistically significant in a few instances but not enough to influence clinical decisions and with good ICCs (0.67 and better). Similarly, the differences in the 2 methods were small, and ICCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.98. CONCLUSION. This study supports the use of computer workstation measurements in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. The parameters used in this study were comparable, whether measured on film or at clinical workstations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1300-1303
Number of pages4
JournalSpine
Volume35
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

Spondylolisthesis
Motion Pictures
Lordosis
Scoliosis
Radiology
Reading

Keywords

  • Digital radiography
  • Interobserver reliability
  • Intraobserver reliability
  • Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A comparison of film and computer workstation measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis : Intraobserver and interobserver reliability. / Bolesta, Michael J.; Winslow, Lauren; Gill, Kevin.

In: Spine, Vol. 35, No. 13, 01.06.2010, p. 1300-1303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2345e1640abd4655bac92081a7e86003,
title = "A comparison of film and computer workstation measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis: Intraobserver and interobserver reliability",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN. A comparison of measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis made on film and on computer workstations. OBJECTIVE. To determine whether the 2 methodologies are comparable in some of the parameters used to assess lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Digital radiology has been replacing analog radiographs. In scoliosis, several studies have shown that measurements made on digital and analog films are similar and that they are also similar to those made on computer workstations. Such work has not been done in spondylolisthesis. METHODS. Twenty-four cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were identified from our clinic practice. Three observers measured anterior displacement, sagittal rotation, and lumbar lordosis on digital films using the same protractor and pencil. The same parameters were measured on the same studies at clinical workstations. All measurements were repeated 2 weeks later. A statistician determined the intra and interobserver reliability of the 2 measurement methods and the degree of agreement between the 2 methods. RESULTS. The differences between the first and second readings did reach statistical significance in some cases, but none of them were large enough to be clinically meaningful. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥0.80 except for one (0.67). The difference among the 3 observers was similarly statistically significant in a few instances but not enough to influence clinical decisions and with good ICCs (0.67 and better). Similarly, the differences in the 2 methods were small, and ICCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.98. CONCLUSION. This study supports the use of computer workstation measurements in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. The parameters used in this study were comparable, whether measured on film or at clinical workstations.",
keywords = "Digital radiography, Interobserver reliability, Intraobserver reliability, Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis",
author = "Bolesta, {Michael J.} and Lauren Winslow and Kevin Gill",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c2177f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1300--1303",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of film and computer workstation measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis

T2 - Intraobserver and interobserver reliability

AU - Bolesta, Michael J.

AU - Winslow, Lauren

AU - Gill, Kevin

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - STUDY DESIGN. A comparison of measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis made on film and on computer workstations. OBJECTIVE. To determine whether the 2 methodologies are comparable in some of the parameters used to assess lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Digital radiology has been replacing analog radiographs. In scoliosis, several studies have shown that measurements made on digital and analog films are similar and that they are also similar to those made on computer workstations. Such work has not been done in spondylolisthesis. METHODS. Twenty-four cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were identified from our clinic practice. Three observers measured anterior displacement, sagittal rotation, and lumbar lordosis on digital films using the same protractor and pencil. The same parameters were measured on the same studies at clinical workstations. All measurements were repeated 2 weeks later. A statistician determined the intra and interobserver reliability of the 2 measurement methods and the degree of agreement between the 2 methods. RESULTS. The differences between the first and second readings did reach statistical significance in some cases, but none of them were large enough to be clinically meaningful. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥0.80 except for one (0.67). The difference among the 3 observers was similarly statistically significant in a few instances but not enough to influence clinical decisions and with good ICCs (0.67 and better). Similarly, the differences in the 2 methods were small, and ICCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.98. CONCLUSION. This study supports the use of computer workstation measurements in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. The parameters used in this study were comparable, whether measured on film or at clinical workstations.

AB - STUDY DESIGN. A comparison of measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis made on film and on computer workstations. OBJECTIVE. To determine whether the 2 methodologies are comparable in some of the parameters used to assess lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Digital radiology has been replacing analog radiographs. In scoliosis, several studies have shown that measurements made on digital and analog films are similar and that they are also similar to those made on computer workstations. Such work has not been done in spondylolisthesis. METHODS. Twenty-four cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were identified from our clinic practice. Three observers measured anterior displacement, sagittal rotation, and lumbar lordosis on digital films using the same protractor and pencil. The same parameters were measured on the same studies at clinical workstations. All measurements were repeated 2 weeks later. A statistician determined the intra and interobserver reliability of the 2 measurement methods and the degree of agreement between the 2 methods. RESULTS. The differences between the first and second readings did reach statistical significance in some cases, but none of them were large enough to be clinically meaningful. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥0.80 except for one (0.67). The difference among the 3 observers was similarly statistically significant in a few instances but not enough to influence clinical decisions and with good ICCs (0.67 and better). Similarly, the differences in the 2 methods were small, and ICCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.98. CONCLUSION. This study supports the use of computer workstation measurements in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. The parameters used in this study were comparable, whether measured on film or at clinical workstations.

KW - Digital radiography

KW - Interobserver reliability

KW - Intraobserver reliability

KW - Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953144081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953144081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c2177f

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c2177f

M3 - Article

C2 - 20512026

AN - SCOPUS:77953144081

VL - 35

SP - 1300

EP - 1303

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 13

ER -