A comparison of knowledge and communication skill evaluations by written essay and oral examinations in preclinical medical students

R. R. Love, P. A. Newcomb, J. H. Schiller, G. Wilding, H. L. Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While both oral and written communication skills are important in the daily work of physicians, medical school evaluation methods focus on content of written essays or often answers to multiple choice questions. To determine the feasibility and value of oral examinations for preclinical medical students, we gave a written short essay examination and an oral examination on the same question to 106 second-year medical students in a required neoplastic diseases course. Examination performance by each method was evaluated according to the same specific content and, separately, based on four communication skills criteria. We found high levels of inter-rater reliability with two oral examiners for both content and skills. Content and skills performance on both written and oral evaluations could be separately determined. Content performance was greater on the written evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-128
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cancer Education
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Oral Diagnosis
Medical Students
Communication
Medical Schools
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A comparison of knowledge and communication skill evaluations by written essay and oral examinations in preclinical medical students. / Love, R. R.; Newcomb, P. A.; Schiller, J. H.; Wilding, G.; Stone, H. L.

In: Journal of Cancer Education, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1993, p. 123-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Love, R. R. ; Newcomb, P. A. ; Schiller, J. H. ; Wilding, G. ; Stone, H. L. / A comparison of knowledge and communication skill evaluations by written essay and oral examinations in preclinical medical students. In: Journal of Cancer Education. 1993 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 123-128.
@article{52c182b785ab46db800cf213d7b4078b,
title = "A comparison of knowledge and communication skill evaluations by written essay and oral examinations in preclinical medical students",
abstract = "While both oral and written communication skills are important in the daily work of physicians, medical school evaluation methods focus on content of written essays or often answers to multiple choice questions. To determine the feasibility and value of oral examinations for preclinical medical students, we gave a written short essay examination and an oral examination on the same question to 106 second-year medical students in a required neoplastic diseases course. Examination performance by each method was evaluated according to the same specific content and, separately, based on four communication skills criteria. We found high levels of inter-rater reliability with two oral examiners for both content and skills. Content and skills performance on both written and oral evaluations could be separately determined. Content performance was greater on the written evaluation.",
author = "Love, {R. R.} and Newcomb, {P. A.} and Schiller, {J. H.} and G. Wilding and Stone, {H. L.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "123--128",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
issn = "0885-8195",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of knowledge and communication skill evaluations by written essay and oral examinations in preclinical medical students

AU - Love, R. R.

AU - Newcomb, P. A.

AU - Schiller, J. H.

AU - Wilding, G.

AU - Stone, H. L.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - While both oral and written communication skills are important in the daily work of physicians, medical school evaluation methods focus on content of written essays or often answers to multiple choice questions. To determine the feasibility and value of oral examinations for preclinical medical students, we gave a written short essay examination and an oral examination on the same question to 106 second-year medical students in a required neoplastic diseases course. Examination performance by each method was evaluated according to the same specific content and, separately, based on four communication skills criteria. We found high levels of inter-rater reliability with two oral examiners for both content and skills. Content and skills performance on both written and oral evaluations could be separately determined. Content performance was greater on the written evaluation.

AB - While both oral and written communication skills are important in the daily work of physicians, medical school evaluation methods focus on content of written essays or often answers to multiple choice questions. To determine the feasibility and value of oral examinations for preclinical medical students, we gave a written short essay examination and an oral examination on the same question to 106 second-year medical students in a required neoplastic diseases course. Examination performance by each method was evaluated according to the same specific content and, separately, based on four communication skills criteria. We found high levels of inter-rater reliability with two oral examiners for both content and skills. Content and skills performance on both written and oral evaluations could be separately determined. Content performance was greater on the written evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027232591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027232591&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 123

EP - 128

JO - Journal of Cancer Education

JF - Journal of Cancer Education

SN - 0885-8195

IS - 2

ER -