A comparison of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Rossetti's modification 239 patients

P. L. Leggett, C. D. Bissell, R. Churchman-Winn, C. Ahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and the Rossetti modification represent two different surgical approaches to resolving gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Concerns have arisen that the Rossetti modification results in increased postoperative dysphagia. In this study, we compared a group of patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a group who had undergone the Rossetti modification to determine if there was a significant difference in postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, we wanted to confirm that the Nissen procedure performed laparoscopically could resolve GERD as successfully as the Rossetti modification, with no difference in operative complications. Methods: We prospectively collected data on 101 patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and compared outcomes with those of 138 patients who had undergone the laparoscopic Rossetti modification in a previous series. Results: All patients experienced resolution of reflux symptoms. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications, conversions to open procedure, or length of hospitalization. Paradoxically, there was a significant difference in operating time between the Rossetti and the Nissen groups (70.6 min vs 45.6 min, p = 0.006). Postoperative dysphagia requiring dilation was significantly higher in the Rossetti group (21.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.008). However, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients in the Rossetti group who had had esophagitis preoperatively (95.7% vs 86.1%, p = 0.009), although the proportion of patients having Barrett's esophagus was higher in the Nissen group (9.4% vs 24.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Both approaches resolved reflux symptoms without significant differences in complications, conversions, or length of stay. Preoperative differences between groups, as well as the method of sequentially comparing the two different procedures, prevent us from attributing greater postoperative dysphagia in the Rossetti group solely to the choice of surgical approach. Prospective randomized studies are needed to control for variables, such as surgical team experience and patient differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)473-477
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2000

Fingerprint

Fundoplication
Deglutition Disorders
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Conversion to Open Surgery
Barrett Esophagus
Esophagitis
Intraoperative Complications
Dilatation
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Fundoplication
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • Laparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A comparison of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Rossetti's modification 239 patients. / Leggett, P. L.; Bissell, C. D.; Churchman-Winn, R.; Ahn, C.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 14, No. 5, 05.2000, p. 473-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leggett, P. L. ; Bissell, C. D. ; Churchman-Winn, R. ; Ahn, C. / A comparison of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Rossetti's modification 239 patients. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 2000 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 473-477.
@article{e5b5bfa9bc7d42a7bf8050f17663b2de,
title = "A comparison of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Rossetti's modification 239 patients",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and the Rossetti modification represent two different surgical approaches to resolving gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Concerns have arisen that the Rossetti modification results in increased postoperative dysphagia. In this study, we compared a group of patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a group who had undergone the Rossetti modification to determine if there was a significant difference in postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, we wanted to confirm that the Nissen procedure performed laparoscopically could resolve GERD as successfully as the Rossetti modification, with no difference in operative complications. Methods: We prospectively collected data on 101 patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and compared outcomes with those of 138 patients who had undergone the laparoscopic Rossetti modification in a previous series. Results: All patients experienced resolution of reflux symptoms. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications, conversions to open procedure, or length of hospitalization. Paradoxically, there was a significant difference in operating time between the Rossetti and the Nissen groups (70.6 min vs 45.6 min, p = 0.006). Postoperative dysphagia requiring dilation was significantly higher in the Rossetti group (21.7{\%} vs 8.9{\%}, p = 0.008). However, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients in the Rossetti group who had had esophagitis preoperatively (95.7{\%} vs 86.1{\%}, p = 0.009), although the proportion of patients having Barrett's esophagus was higher in the Nissen group (9.4{\%} vs 24.8{\%}, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Both approaches resolved reflux symptoms without significant differences in complications, conversions, or length of stay. Preoperative differences between groups, as well as the method of sequentially comparing the two different procedures, prevent us from attributing greater postoperative dysphagia in the Rossetti group solely to the choice of surgical approach. Prospective randomized studies are needed to control for variables, such as surgical team experience and patient differences.",
keywords = "Fundoplication, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Laparoscopy",
author = "Leggett, {P. L.} and Bissell, {C. D.} and R. Churchman-Winn and C. Ahn",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s004640020079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "473--477",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Rossetti's modification 239 patients

AU - Leggett, P. L.

AU - Bissell, C. D.

AU - Churchman-Winn, R.

AU - Ahn, C.

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and the Rossetti modification represent two different surgical approaches to resolving gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Concerns have arisen that the Rossetti modification results in increased postoperative dysphagia. In this study, we compared a group of patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a group who had undergone the Rossetti modification to determine if there was a significant difference in postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, we wanted to confirm that the Nissen procedure performed laparoscopically could resolve GERD as successfully as the Rossetti modification, with no difference in operative complications. Methods: We prospectively collected data on 101 patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and compared outcomes with those of 138 patients who had undergone the laparoscopic Rossetti modification in a previous series. Results: All patients experienced resolution of reflux symptoms. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications, conversions to open procedure, or length of hospitalization. Paradoxically, there was a significant difference in operating time between the Rossetti and the Nissen groups (70.6 min vs 45.6 min, p = 0.006). Postoperative dysphagia requiring dilation was significantly higher in the Rossetti group (21.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.008). However, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients in the Rossetti group who had had esophagitis preoperatively (95.7% vs 86.1%, p = 0.009), although the proportion of patients having Barrett's esophagus was higher in the Nissen group (9.4% vs 24.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Both approaches resolved reflux symptoms without significant differences in complications, conversions, or length of stay. Preoperative differences between groups, as well as the method of sequentially comparing the two different procedures, prevent us from attributing greater postoperative dysphagia in the Rossetti group solely to the choice of surgical approach. Prospective randomized studies are needed to control for variables, such as surgical team experience and patient differences.

AB - Background: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and the Rossetti modification represent two different surgical approaches to resolving gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Concerns have arisen that the Rossetti modification results in increased postoperative dysphagia. In this study, we compared a group of patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a group who had undergone the Rossetti modification to determine if there was a significant difference in postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, we wanted to confirm that the Nissen procedure performed laparoscopically could resolve GERD as successfully as the Rossetti modification, with no difference in operative complications. Methods: We prospectively collected data on 101 patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and compared outcomes with those of 138 patients who had undergone the laparoscopic Rossetti modification in a previous series. Results: All patients experienced resolution of reflux symptoms. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications, conversions to open procedure, or length of hospitalization. Paradoxically, there was a significant difference in operating time between the Rossetti and the Nissen groups (70.6 min vs 45.6 min, p = 0.006). Postoperative dysphagia requiring dilation was significantly higher in the Rossetti group (21.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.008). However, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients in the Rossetti group who had had esophagitis preoperatively (95.7% vs 86.1%, p = 0.009), although the proportion of patients having Barrett's esophagus was higher in the Nissen group (9.4% vs 24.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Both approaches resolved reflux symptoms without significant differences in complications, conversions, or length of stay. Preoperative differences between groups, as well as the method of sequentially comparing the two different procedures, prevent us from attributing greater postoperative dysphagia in the Rossetti group solely to the choice of surgical approach. Prospective randomized studies are needed to control for variables, such as surgical team experience and patient differences.

KW - Fundoplication

KW - Gastroesophageal reflux disease

KW - Laparoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033932522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033932522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s004640020079

DO - 10.1007/s004640020079

M3 - Article

C2 - 10858475

AN - SCOPUS:0033932522

VL - 14

SP - 473

EP - 477

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 5

ER -