A comparison of optimization algorithms for localized in vivo B 0 shimming

Sahar Nassirpour, Paul Chang, Ariane Fillmer, Anke Henning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare several different optimization algorithms currently used for localized in vivo B 0 shimming, and to introduce a novel, fast, and robust constrained regularized algorithm (ConsTru) for this purpose. Methods: Ten different optimization algorithms (including samples from both generic and dedicated least-squares solvers, and a novel constrained regularized inversion method) were implemented and compared for shimming in five different shimming volumes on 66 in vivo data sets from both 7 T and 9.4 T. The best algorithm was chosen to perform single-voxel spectroscopy at 9.4 T in the frontal cortex of the brain on 10 volunteers. Results: The results of the performance tests proved that the shimming algorithm is prone to unstable solutions if it depends on the value of a starting point, and is not regularized to handle ill-conditioned problems. The ConsTru algorithm proved to be the most robust, fast, and efficient algorithm among all of the chosen algorithms. It enabled acquisition of spectra of reproducible high quality in the frontal cortex at 9.4 T. Conclusions: For localized in vivo B 0 shimming, the use of a dedicated linear least-squares solver instead of a generic nonlinear one is highly recommended. Among all of the linear solvers, the constrained regularized method (ConsTru) was found to be both fast and most robust. Magn Reson Med 79:1145–1156, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1145-1156
Number of pages12
JournalMagnetic resonance in medicine
Volume79
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • B shimming
  • constrained optimization
  • constrained regularization
  • single-voxel
  • ultrahigh field strengths

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of optimization algorithms for localized in vivo B <sub>0</sub> shimming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this