A comparison of optimization algorithms for localized in vivo B 0 shimming

Sahar Nassirpour, Paul Chang, Ariane Fillmer, Anke Henning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare several different optimization algorithms currently used for localized in vivo B 0 shimming, and to introduce a novel, fast, and robust constrained regularized algorithm (ConsTru) for this purpose. Methods: Ten different optimization algorithms (including samples from both generic and dedicated least-squares solvers, and a novel constrained regularized inversion method) were implemented and compared for shimming in five different shimming volumes on 66 in vivo data sets from both 7 T and 9.4 T. The best algorithm was chosen to perform single-voxel spectroscopy at 9.4 T in the frontal cortex of the brain on 10 volunteers. Results: The results of the performance tests proved that the shimming algorithm is prone to unstable solutions if it depends on the value of a starting point, and is not regularized to handle ill-conditioned problems. The ConsTru algorithm proved to be the most robust, fast, and efficient algorithm among all of the chosen algorithms. It enabled acquisition of spectra of reproducible high quality in the frontal cortex at 9.4 T. Conclusions: For localized in vivo B 0 shimming, the use of a dedicated linear least-squares solver instead of a generic nonlinear one is highly recommended. Among all of the linear solvers, the constrained regularized method (ConsTru) was found to be both fast and most robust. Magn Reson Med 79:1145–1156, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1145-1156
Number of pages12
JournalMagnetic resonance in medicine
Volume79
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Frontal Lobe
Least-Squares Analysis
Volunteers
Spectrum Analysis
Brain
Datasets

Keywords

  • B shimming
  • constrained optimization
  • constrained regularization
  • single-voxel
  • ultrahigh field strengths

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

A comparison of optimization algorithms for localized in vivo B 0 shimming . / Nassirpour, Sahar; Chang, Paul; Fillmer, Ariane; Henning, Anke.

In: Magnetic resonance in medicine, Vol. 79, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 1145-1156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nassirpour, Sahar ; Chang, Paul ; Fillmer, Ariane ; Henning, Anke. / A comparison of optimization algorithms for localized in vivo B 0 shimming In: Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 79, No. 2. pp. 1145-1156.
@article{12e0943855bc4a118e604a698b08d3f6,
title = "A comparison of optimization algorithms for localized in vivo B 0 shimming",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare several different optimization algorithms currently used for localized in vivo B 0 shimming, and to introduce a novel, fast, and robust constrained regularized algorithm (ConsTru) for this purpose. Methods: Ten different optimization algorithms (including samples from both generic and dedicated least-squares solvers, and a novel constrained regularized inversion method) were implemented and compared for shimming in five different shimming volumes on 66 in vivo data sets from both 7 T and 9.4 T. The best algorithm was chosen to perform single-voxel spectroscopy at 9.4 T in the frontal cortex of the brain on 10 volunteers. Results: The results of the performance tests proved that the shimming algorithm is prone to unstable solutions if it depends on the value of a starting point, and is not regularized to handle ill-conditioned problems. The ConsTru algorithm proved to be the most robust, fast, and efficient algorithm among all of the chosen algorithms. It enabled acquisition of spectra of reproducible high quality in the frontal cortex at 9.4 T. Conclusions: For localized in vivo B 0 shimming, the use of a dedicated linear least-squares solver instead of a generic nonlinear one is highly recommended. Among all of the linear solvers, the constrained regularized method (ConsTru) was found to be both fast and most robust. Magn Reson Med 79:1145–1156, 2018.",
keywords = "B shimming, constrained optimization, constrained regularization, single-voxel, ultrahigh field strengths",
author = "Sahar Nassirpour and Paul Chang and Ariane Fillmer and Anke Henning",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.26758",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1145--1156",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of optimization algorithms for localized in vivo B 0 shimming

AU - Nassirpour, Sahar

AU - Chang, Paul

AU - Fillmer, Ariane

AU - Henning, Anke

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare several different optimization algorithms currently used for localized in vivo B 0 shimming, and to introduce a novel, fast, and robust constrained regularized algorithm (ConsTru) for this purpose. Methods: Ten different optimization algorithms (including samples from both generic and dedicated least-squares solvers, and a novel constrained regularized inversion method) were implemented and compared for shimming in five different shimming volumes on 66 in vivo data sets from both 7 T and 9.4 T. The best algorithm was chosen to perform single-voxel spectroscopy at 9.4 T in the frontal cortex of the brain on 10 volunteers. Results: The results of the performance tests proved that the shimming algorithm is prone to unstable solutions if it depends on the value of a starting point, and is not regularized to handle ill-conditioned problems. The ConsTru algorithm proved to be the most robust, fast, and efficient algorithm among all of the chosen algorithms. It enabled acquisition of spectra of reproducible high quality in the frontal cortex at 9.4 T. Conclusions: For localized in vivo B 0 shimming, the use of a dedicated linear least-squares solver instead of a generic nonlinear one is highly recommended. Among all of the linear solvers, the constrained regularized method (ConsTru) was found to be both fast and most robust. Magn Reson Med 79:1145–1156, 2018.

AB - Purpose: To compare several different optimization algorithms currently used for localized in vivo B 0 shimming, and to introduce a novel, fast, and robust constrained regularized algorithm (ConsTru) for this purpose. Methods: Ten different optimization algorithms (including samples from both generic and dedicated least-squares solvers, and a novel constrained regularized inversion method) were implemented and compared for shimming in five different shimming volumes on 66 in vivo data sets from both 7 T and 9.4 T. The best algorithm was chosen to perform single-voxel spectroscopy at 9.4 T in the frontal cortex of the brain on 10 volunteers. Results: The results of the performance tests proved that the shimming algorithm is prone to unstable solutions if it depends on the value of a starting point, and is not regularized to handle ill-conditioned problems. The ConsTru algorithm proved to be the most robust, fast, and efficient algorithm among all of the chosen algorithms. It enabled acquisition of spectra of reproducible high quality in the frontal cortex at 9.4 T. Conclusions: For localized in vivo B 0 shimming, the use of a dedicated linear least-squares solver instead of a generic nonlinear one is highly recommended. Among all of the linear solvers, the constrained regularized method (ConsTru) was found to be both fast and most robust. Magn Reson Med 79:1145–1156, 2018.

KW - B shimming

KW - constrained optimization

KW - constrained regularization

KW - single-voxel

KW - ultrahigh field strengths

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019880273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019880273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.26758

DO - 10.1002/mrm.26758

M3 - Article

C2 - 28543722

AN - SCOPUS:85019880273

VL - 79

SP - 1145

EP - 1156

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 2

ER -