A comparison of strict face-down positioning with adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Xiao Chen, Ying Yan, Ling Hong, Li Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare face-down positioning and adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: Sixty-eight eyes from 68 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were included in this study. All patients received pars plana vitrectomy with long-acting gas for tamponade and then subdivided into 2 groups: 29 were included in a face-down group and 39 were included in the adjustable positioning group. Patients were followed up for 3 months. The main outcome was the rate of anatomical retinal reattachment. Secondary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and postoperative complications. Results: Most of the preoperative baseline characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different. The anatomical success rates after primary surgery were 89.7% and 92.3% for the face-down group and the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 1.00). Best-corrected visual acuity at the 3-month postoperative visit was 0.74 ± 0.25 for the face-down group and 0.77 ± 0.36 for the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 0.41). The rates of complications were not statistically different in the two groups. Conclusion: Adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair is effective and safe. Face-down positioning seems not to be necessary for all patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)892-898
Number of pages7
JournalRetina
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 8 2015

Fingerprint

Temazepam
Vitrectomy
Retinal Detachment
Gases
Visual Acuity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • postoperative position
  • rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
  • vitrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A comparison of strict face-down positioning with adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. / Chen, Xiao; Yan, Ying; Hong, Ling; Zhu, Li.

In: Retina, Vol. 35, No. 5, 08.05.2015, p. 892-898.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d49cf6b9f92e4b3ab9296b0b5b1eb1ad,
title = "A comparison of strict face-down positioning with adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare face-down positioning and adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: Sixty-eight eyes from 68 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were included in this study. All patients received pars plana vitrectomy with long-acting gas for tamponade and then subdivided into 2 groups: 29 were included in a face-down group and 39 were included in the adjustable positioning group. Patients were followed up for 3 months. The main outcome was the rate of anatomical retinal reattachment. Secondary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and postoperative complications. Results: Most of the preoperative baseline characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different. The anatomical success rates after primary surgery were 89.7{\%} and 92.3{\%} for the face-down group and the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 1.00). Best-corrected visual acuity at the 3-month postoperative visit was 0.74 ± 0.25 for the face-down group and 0.77 ± 0.36 for the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 0.41). The rates of complications were not statistically different in the two groups. Conclusion: Adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair is effective and safe. Face-down positioning seems not to be necessary for all patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.",
keywords = "postoperative position, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, vitrectomy",
author = "Xiao Chen and Ying Yan and Ling Hong and Li Zhu",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1097/IAE.0000000000000413",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "892--898",
journal = "Retina",
issn = "0275-004X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of strict face-down positioning with adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

AU - Chen, Xiao

AU - Yan, Ying

AU - Hong, Ling

AU - Zhu, Li

PY - 2015/5/8

Y1 - 2015/5/8

N2 - Purpose: To compare face-down positioning and adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: Sixty-eight eyes from 68 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were included in this study. All patients received pars plana vitrectomy with long-acting gas for tamponade and then subdivided into 2 groups: 29 were included in a face-down group and 39 were included in the adjustable positioning group. Patients were followed up for 3 months. The main outcome was the rate of anatomical retinal reattachment. Secondary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and postoperative complications. Results: Most of the preoperative baseline characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different. The anatomical success rates after primary surgery were 89.7% and 92.3% for the face-down group and the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 1.00). Best-corrected visual acuity at the 3-month postoperative visit was 0.74 ± 0.25 for the face-down group and 0.77 ± 0.36 for the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 0.41). The rates of complications were not statistically different in the two groups. Conclusion: Adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair is effective and safe. Face-down positioning seems not to be necessary for all patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

AB - Purpose: To compare face-down positioning and adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods: Sixty-eight eyes from 68 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were included in this study. All patients received pars plana vitrectomy with long-acting gas for tamponade and then subdivided into 2 groups: 29 were included in a face-down group and 39 were included in the adjustable positioning group. Patients were followed up for 3 months. The main outcome was the rate of anatomical retinal reattachment. Secondary outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and postoperative complications. Results: Most of the preoperative baseline characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different. The anatomical success rates after primary surgery were 89.7% and 92.3% for the face-down group and the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 1.00). Best-corrected visual acuity at the 3-month postoperative visit was 0.74 ± 0.25 for the face-down group and 0.77 ± 0.36 for the adjustable positioning group, respectively (P 0.41). The rates of complications were not statistically different in the two groups. Conclusion: Adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair is effective and safe. Face-down positioning seems not to be necessary for all patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

KW - postoperative position

KW - rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

KW - vitrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929045093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929045093&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000413

DO - 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000413

M3 - Article

C2 - 25635574

AN - SCOPUS:84929045093

VL - 35

SP - 892

EP - 898

JO - Retina

JF - Retina

SN - 0275-004X

IS - 5

ER -