A comparison of the likelihood ratio test and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests for detecting association of rare variants

Guan Xing, Hung Chih Ku, Chao Xing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent paper in this journal, the use of variance-stabilising transformation techniques was proposed to overcome the problem of inadequacy in normality approximation when testing association for a low-frequency variant in a case-control study. It was shown that tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations are more powerful than Fisher's exact test while controlling for type I error rate. Earlier in the journal, another study had shown that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is superior to Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test in testing association for low-frequency variants. Thus, it is of interest to make a direct comparison between the LRT and the tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations. In this commentary, we show that the LRT and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests have comparable power greater than Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-335
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of Human Genetics
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Case-Control Studies

Keywords

  • Likelihood ratio test
  • Low-frequency variants
  • Variance-stabilising transformation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Genetics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A comparison of the likelihood ratio test and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests for detecting association of rare variants. / Xing, Guan; Ku, Hung Chih; Xing, Chao.

In: Annals of Human Genetics, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2013, p. 333-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e130ad1bfe848038c6062008b7623e4,
title = "A comparison of the likelihood ratio test and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests for detecting association of rare variants",
abstract = "In a recent paper in this journal, the use of variance-stabilising transformation techniques was proposed to overcome the problem of inadequacy in normality approximation when testing association for a low-frequency variant in a case-control study. It was shown that tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations are more powerful than Fisher's exact test while controlling for type I error rate. Earlier in the journal, another study had shown that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is superior to Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test in testing association for low-frequency variants. Thus, it is of interest to make a direct comparison between the LRT and the tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations. In this commentary, we show that the LRT and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests have comparable power greater than Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test.",
keywords = "Likelihood ratio test, Low-frequency variants, Variance-stabilising transformation",
author = "Guan Xing and Ku, {Hung Chih} and Chao Xing",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/ahg.12022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "333--335",
journal = "Annals of Human Genetics",
issn = "0003-4800",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the likelihood ratio test and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests for detecting association of rare variants

AU - Xing, Guan

AU - Ku, Hung Chih

AU - Xing, Chao

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In a recent paper in this journal, the use of variance-stabilising transformation techniques was proposed to overcome the problem of inadequacy in normality approximation when testing association for a low-frequency variant in a case-control study. It was shown that tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations are more powerful than Fisher's exact test while controlling for type I error rate. Earlier in the journal, another study had shown that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is superior to Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test in testing association for low-frequency variants. Thus, it is of interest to make a direct comparison between the LRT and the tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations. In this commentary, we show that the LRT and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests have comparable power greater than Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test.

AB - In a recent paper in this journal, the use of variance-stabilising transformation techniques was proposed to overcome the problem of inadequacy in normality approximation when testing association for a low-frequency variant in a case-control study. It was shown that tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations are more powerful than Fisher's exact test while controlling for type I error rate. Earlier in the journal, another study had shown that the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is superior to Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test in testing association for low-frequency variants. Thus, it is of interest to make a direct comparison between the LRT and the tests based on the variance-stabilising transformations. In this commentary, we show that the LRT and the variance-stabilising transformation-based tests have comparable power greater than Fisher's exact test, Wald's test, and Pearson's X2 test.

KW - Likelihood ratio test

KW - Low-frequency variants

KW - Variance-stabilising transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883152120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883152120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ahg.12022

DO - 10.1111/ahg.12022

M3 - Article

C2 - 23488943

AN - SCOPUS:84883152120

VL - 77

SP - 333

EP - 335

JO - Annals of Human Genetics

JF - Annals of Human Genetics

SN - 0003-4800

IS - 4

ER -