A Cost-Effective Proficiency-Based Knot-Tying and Suturing Curriculum for Residency Programs

Daniel J. Scott, Mouza T. Goova, Seifu T. Tesfay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a structured open skills curriculum for knot-tying and suturing using expert-derived performance goals and to examine its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and construct validity. Methods: Using commercially available bench models, 11 standardized tasks (ranging from 2-handed knot-tying to running subcuticular closure) were developed and scored using previously validated metrics based on time and errors. Expert performance was used to establish training endpoints and to create a video tutorial. PGY 1 residents (n = 4) were enrolled in a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study that included proctored orientation and baseline testing, self-training to proficiency, and proctored post-testing (conducted over a 4-wk period). Baseline trainee scores were compared with expert scores to evaluate construct validity. Results: The 11 tasks proved relatively robust, and excellent feedback was obtained from the trainees regarding educational benefit. Overall, trainees performed 144 ± 33 repetitions over 11 ± 2 h. Trainees achieved proficiency for 4.6% of the 11 tasks at baseline, 91% during training, and 84% at post-testing. Trainees demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to post-testing, validating skill acquisition; baseline trainee and expert performance were significantly different, confirming construct validity. Curriculum development cost $1200 and required 72 man-hours. Incremental training cost less than $12 per participant and required 8 man-hours per rotation using the video-based self-practice curriculum. In response to participant feedback, two of the 11 tasks were modified and a twelfth task was added. Conclusions: This curriculum is cost-effective, feasible within the context of residency training, educationally beneficial, and demonstrates construct validity. More widespread adoption of standardized, validated skills curricula such as this by residency programs is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-15
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume141
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Curriculum
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research Ethics Committees
Cost-Benefit Analysis

Keywords

  • knot-tying and suturing curriculum
  • simulation
  • skill acquisition
  • skills lab
  • skills training
  • surgical education
  • suturing models
  • technical skills

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A Cost-Effective Proficiency-Based Knot-Tying and Suturing Curriculum for Residency Programs. / Scott, Daniel J.; Goova, Mouza T.; Tesfay, Seifu T.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 141, No. 1, 07.2007, p. 7-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b40741a6b6fb4cedb43fa6e97dd51f00,
title = "A Cost-Effective Proficiency-Based Knot-Tying and Suturing Curriculum for Residency Programs",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a structured open skills curriculum for knot-tying and suturing using expert-derived performance goals and to examine its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and construct validity. Methods: Using commercially available bench models, 11 standardized tasks (ranging from 2-handed knot-tying to running subcuticular closure) were developed and scored using previously validated metrics based on time and errors. Expert performance was used to establish training endpoints and to create a video tutorial. PGY 1 residents (n = 4) were enrolled in a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study that included proctored orientation and baseline testing, self-training to proficiency, and proctored post-testing (conducted over a 4-wk period). Baseline trainee scores were compared with expert scores to evaluate construct validity. Results: The 11 tasks proved relatively robust, and excellent feedback was obtained from the trainees regarding educational benefit. Overall, trainees performed 144 ± 33 repetitions over 11 ± 2 h. Trainees achieved proficiency for 4.6{\%} of the 11 tasks at baseline, 91{\%} during training, and 84{\%} at post-testing. Trainees demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to post-testing, validating skill acquisition; baseline trainee and expert performance were significantly different, confirming construct validity. Curriculum development cost $1200 and required 72 man-hours. Incremental training cost less than $12 per participant and required 8 man-hours per rotation using the video-based self-practice curriculum. In response to participant feedback, two of the 11 tasks were modified and a twelfth task was added. Conclusions: This curriculum is cost-effective, feasible within the context of residency training, educationally beneficial, and demonstrates construct validity. More widespread adoption of standardized, validated skills curricula such as this by residency programs is warranted.",
keywords = "knot-tying and suturing curriculum, simulation, skill acquisition, skills lab, skills training, surgical education, suturing models, technical skills",
author = "Scott, {Daniel J.} and Goova, {Mouza T.} and Tesfay, {Seifu T.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "7--15",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Cost-Effective Proficiency-Based Knot-Tying and Suturing Curriculum for Residency Programs

AU - Scott, Daniel J.

AU - Goova, Mouza T.

AU - Tesfay, Seifu T.

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a structured open skills curriculum for knot-tying and suturing using expert-derived performance goals and to examine its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and construct validity. Methods: Using commercially available bench models, 11 standardized tasks (ranging from 2-handed knot-tying to running subcuticular closure) were developed and scored using previously validated metrics based on time and errors. Expert performance was used to establish training endpoints and to create a video tutorial. PGY 1 residents (n = 4) were enrolled in a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study that included proctored orientation and baseline testing, self-training to proficiency, and proctored post-testing (conducted over a 4-wk period). Baseline trainee scores were compared with expert scores to evaluate construct validity. Results: The 11 tasks proved relatively robust, and excellent feedback was obtained from the trainees regarding educational benefit. Overall, trainees performed 144 ± 33 repetitions over 11 ± 2 h. Trainees achieved proficiency for 4.6% of the 11 tasks at baseline, 91% during training, and 84% at post-testing. Trainees demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to post-testing, validating skill acquisition; baseline trainee and expert performance were significantly different, confirming construct validity. Curriculum development cost $1200 and required 72 man-hours. Incremental training cost less than $12 per participant and required 8 man-hours per rotation using the video-based self-practice curriculum. In response to participant feedback, two of the 11 tasks were modified and a twelfth task was added. Conclusions: This curriculum is cost-effective, feasible within the context of residency training, educationally beneficial, and demonstrates construct validity. More widespread adoption of standardized, validated skills curricula such as this by residency programs is warranted.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a structured open skills curriculum for knot-tying and suturing using expert-derived performance goals and to examine its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and construct validity. Methods: Using commercially available bench models, 11 standardized tasks (ranging from 2-handed knot-tying to running subcuticular closure) were developed and scored using previously validated metrics based on time and errors. Expert performance was used to establish training endpoints and to create a video tutorial. PGY 1 residents (n = 4) were enrolled in a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study that included proctored orientation and baseline testing, self-training to proficiency, and proctored post-testing (conducted over a 4-wk period). Baseline trainee scores were compared with expert scores to evaluate construct validity. Results: The 11 tasks proved relatively robust, and excellent feedback was obtained from the trainees regarding educational benefit. Overall, trainees performed 144 ± 33 repetitions over 11 ± 2 h. Trainees achieved proficiency for 4.6% of the 11 tasks at baseline, 91% during training, and 84% at post-testing. Trainees demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to post-testing, validating skill acquisition; baseline trainee and expert performance were significantly different, confirming construct validity. Curriculum development cost $1200 and required 72 man-hours. Incremental training cost less than $12 per participant and required 8 man-hours per rotation using the video-based self-practice curriculum. In response to participant feedback, two of the 11 tasks were modified and a twelfth task was added. Conclusions: This curriculum is cost-effective, feasible within the context of residency training, educationally beneficial, and demonstrates construct validity. More widespread adoption of standardized, validated skills curricula such as this by residency programs is warranted.

KW - knot-tying and suturing curriculum

KW - simulation

KW - skill acquisition

KW - skills lab

KW - skills training

KW - surgical education

KW - suturing models

KW - technical skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250190989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250190989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.043

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.043

M3 - Article

C2 - 17574034

AN - SCOPUS:34250190989

VL - 141

SP - 7

EP - 15

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -