A cross-sectional study of the development of volitional control of spatial attention in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Heather M. Shapiro, Yukari Takarae, Danielle J. Harvey, Margarita H. Cabaral, Tony J. Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) results from a 1.5- to 3-megabase deletion on the long arm of chromosome 22 and occurs in approximately 1 in 4000 live births. Previous studies indicate that children with 22q11.2DS are impaired on tasks involving spatial attention. However, the degree to which these impairments are due to volitionally generated (endogenous) or reflexive (exogenous) orienting of attention is unclear. Additionally, the efficacy of these component attention processes throughout child development in 22q11.2DS has yet to be examined. Methods: Here we compared the performance of a wide age range (7 to 14 years) of children with 22q11.2DS to typically developing (TD) children on a comprehensive visual cueing paradigm to dissociate the contributions of endogenous and exogenous attentional impairments. Paired and two-sample t-tests were used to compare outcome measures within a group or between groups. Additionally, repeated measures regression models were fit to the data in order to examine effects of age on performance. Results: We found that children with 22q11.2DS were impaired on a cueing task with an endogenous cue, but not on the same task with an exogenous cue. Additionally, it was younger children exclusively who were impaired on endogenous cueing when compared to age-matched TD children. Older children with 22q11.2DS performed comparably to age-matched TD peers on the endogenous cueing task. Conclusions: These results suggest that endogenous but not exogenous orienting of attention is selectively impaired in children with 22q11.2DS. Additionally, the age effect on cueing in children with 22q11.2DS suggests a possible altered developmental trajectory of endogenous cueing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

DiGeorge Syndrome
Chromosome Deletion
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cues
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22
Live Birth
Child Development
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
  • Childhood cognitive development
  • Developmental disorders
  • Spatial attention
  • Velo-cardio-facial syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

A cross-sectional study of the development of volitional control of spatial attention in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. / Shapiro, Heather M.; Takarae, Yukari; Harvey, Danielle J.; Cabaral, Margarita H.; Simon, Tony J.

In: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9979e7f89e940cd88ac2f08f369a511,
title = "A cross-sectional study of the development of volitional control of spatial attention in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome",
abstract = "Background: Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) results from a 1.5- to 3-megabase deletion on the long arm of chromosome 22 and occurs in approximately 1 in 4000 live births. Previous studies indicate that children with 22q11.2DS are impaired on tasks involving spatial attention. However, the degree to which these impairments are due to volitionally generated (endogenous) or reflexive (exogenous) orienting of attention is unclear. Additionally, the efficacy of these component attention processes throughout child development in 22q11.2DS has yet to be examined. Methods: Here we compared the performance of a wide age range (7 to 14 years) of children with 22q11.2DS to typically developing (TD) children on a comprehensive visual cueing paradigm to dissociate the contributions of endogenous and exogenous attentional impairments. Paired and two-sample t-tests were used to compare outcome measures within a group or between groups. Additionally, repeated measures regression models were fit to the data in order to examine effects of age on performance. Results: We found that children with 22q11.2DS were impaired on a cueing task with an endogenous cue, but not on the same task with an exogenous cue. Additionally, it was younger children exclusively who were impaired on endogenous cueing when compared to age-matched TD children. Older children with 22q11.2DS performed comparably to age-matched TD peers on the endogenous cueing task. Conclusions: These results suggest that endogenous but not exogenous orienting of attention is selectively impaired in children with 22q11.2DS. Additionally, the age effect on cueing in children with 22q11.2DS suggests a possible altered developmental trajectory of endogenous cueing.",
keywords = "22q11.2 deletion syndrome, Childhood cognitive development, Developmental disorders, Spatial attention, Velo-cardio-facial syndrome",
author = "Shapiro, {Heather M.} and Yukari Takarae and Harvey, {Danielle J.} and Cabaral, {Margarita H.} and Simon, {Tony J.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1186/1866-1955-4-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders",
issn = "1866-1947",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional study of the development of volitional control of spatial attention in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

AU - Shapiro, Heather M.

AU - Takarae, Yukari

AU - Harvey, Danielle J.

AU - Cabaral, Margarita H.

AU - Simon, Tony J.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) results from a 1.5- to 3-megabase deletion on the long arm of chromosome 22 and occurs in approximately 1 in 4000 live births. Previous studies indicate that children with 22q11.2DS are impaired on tasks involving spatial attention. However, the degree to which these impairments are due to volitionally generated (endogenous) or reflexive (exogenous) orienting of attention is unclear. Additionally, the efficacy of these component attention processes throughout child development in 22q11.2DS has yet to be examined. Methods: Here we compared the performance of a wide age range (7 to 14 years) of children with 22q11.2DS to typically developing (TD) children on a comprehensive visual cueing paradigm to dissociate the contributions of endogenous and exogenous attentional impairments. Paired and two-sample t-tests were used to compare outcome measures within a group or between groups. Additionally, repeated measures regression models were fit to the data in order to examine effects of age on performance. Results: We found that children with 22q11.2DS were impaired on a cueing task with an endogenous cue, but not on the same task with an exogenous cue. Additionally, it was younger children exclusively who were impaired on endogenous cueing when compared to age-matched TD children. Older children with 22q11.2DS performed comparably to age-matched TD peers on the endogenous cueing task. Conclusions: These results suggest that endogenous but not exogenous orienting of attention is selectively impaired in children with 22q11.2DS. Additionally, the age effect on cueing in children with 22q11.2DS suggests a possible altered developmental trajectory of endogenous cueing.

AB - Background: Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) results from a 1.5- to 3-megabase deletion on the long arm of chromosome 22 and occurs in approximately 1 in 4000 live births. Previous studies indicate that children with 22q11.2DS are impaired on tasks involving spatial attention. However, the degree to which these impairments are due to volitionally generated (endogenous) or reflexive (exogenous) orienting of attention is unclear. Additionally, the efficacy of these component attention processes throughout child development in 22q11.2DS has yet to be examined. Methods: Here we compared the performance of a wide age range (7 to 14 years) of children with 22q11.2DS to typically developing (TD) children on a comprehensive visual cueing paradigm to dissociate the contributions of endogenous and exogenous attentional impairments. Paired and two-sample t-tests were used to compare outcome measures within a group or between groups. Additionally, repeated measures regression models were fit to the data in order to examine effects of age on performance. Results: We found that children with 22q11.2DS were impaired on a cueing task with an endogenous cue, but not on the same task with an exogenous cue. Additionally, it was younger children exclusively who were impaired on endogenous cueing when compared to age-matched TD children. Older children with 22q11.2DS performed comparably to age-matched TD peers on the endogenous cueing task. Conclusions: These results suggest that endogenous but not exogenous orienting of attention is selectively impaired in children with 22q11.2DS. Additionally, the age effect on cueing in children with 22q11.2DS suggests a possible altered developmental trajectory of endogenous cueing.

KW - 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

KW - Childhood cognitive development

KW - Developmental disorders

KW - Spatial attention

KW - Velo-cardio-facial syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861860446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861860446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1866-1955-4-5

DO - 10.1186/1866-1955-4-5

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

JF - Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

SN - 1866-1947

IS - 1

ER -