A decision theoretic analysis of accounting reliability

Joseph R. Razek, Ira H. Bernstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Accountants use the term traceability of a cost element to describe the extent to which that cost element is related to the specific purpose of the contract. 25 practicing accountants classified a set of cost elements into 2, 3, 4, and 5 categories along this traceability dimension. The purpose was to determine whether limitations in the ability to make absolute judgments described by G. A. Miller and others would be found with the type of stimuli judged by accountants. The Ss' judgments were quite unreliable, despite the fact that they make judgments of this type routinely. Both the amount of information transmitted (systematicity of judgment) and the amount of response equivocation (randomness of judgment) increased with the number of categories available for judgment. In all, results were quite similar to those originally described by Miller. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-222
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1976

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Costs and Cost Analysis
Aptitude
Contracts

Keywords

  • decision theoretic analysis, reliability of absolute judgments of cost element traceability, accountants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

A decision theoretic analysis of accounting reliability. / Razek, Joseph R.; Bernstein, Ira H.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 2, 04.1976, p. 217-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Razek, Joseph R. ; Bernstein, Ira H. / A decision theoretic analysis of accounting reliability. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 1976 ; Vol. 61, No. 2. pp. 217-222.
@article{03cbdb3ac14f4c4d886708646c8bc109,
title = "A decision theoretic analysis of accounting reliability",
abstract = "Accountants use the term traceability of a cost element to describe the extent to which that cost element is related to the specific purpose of the contract. 25 practicing accountants classified a set of cost elements into 2, 3, 4, and 5 categories along this traceability dimension. The purpose was to determine whether limitations in the ability to make absolute judgments described by G. A. Miller and others would be found with the type of stimuli judged by accountants. The Ss' judgments were quite unreliable, despite the fact that they make judgments of this type routinely. Both the amount of information transmitted (systematicity of judgment) and the amount of response equivocation (randomness of judgment) increased with the number of categories available for judgment. In all, results were quite similar to those originally described by Miller. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "decision theoretic analysis, reliability of absolute judgments of cost element traceability, accountants",
author = "Razek, {Joseph R.} and Bernstein, {Ira H.}",
year = "1976",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.217",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "217--222",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A decision theoretic analysis of accounting reliability

AU - Razek, Joseph R.

AU - Bernstein, Ira H.

PY - 1976/4

Y1 - 1976/4

N2 - Accountants use the term traceability of a cost element to describe the extent to which that cost element is related to the specific purpose of the contract. 25 practicing accountants classified a set of cost elements into 2, 3, 4, and 5 categories along this traceability dimension. The purpose was to determine whether limitations in the ability to make absolute judgments described by G. A. Miller and others would be found with the type of stimuli judged by accountants. The Ss' judgments were quite unreliable, despite the fact that they make judgments of this type routinely. Both the amount of information transmitted (systematicity of judgment) and the amount of response equivocation (randomness of judgment) increased with the number of categories available for judgment. In all, results were quite similar to those originally described by Miller. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Accountants use the term traceability of a cost element to describe the extent to which that cost element is related to the specific purpose of the contract. 25 practicing accountants classified a set of cost elements into 2, 3, 4, and 5 categories along this traceability dimension. The purpose was to determine whether limitations in the ability to make absolute judgments described by G. A. Miller and others would be found with the type of stimuli judged by accountants. The Ss' judgments were quite unreliable, despite the fact that they make judgments of this type routinely. Both the amount of information transmitted (systematicity of judgment) and the amount of response equivocation (randomness of judgment) increased with the number of categories available for judgment. In all, results were quite similar to those originally described by Miller. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - decision theoretic analysis, reliability of absolute judgments of cost element traceability, accountants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149404754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149404754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.217

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.217

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 217

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 2

ER -