A dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for lung cancer

Robotic versus conventional linac-based systems

Chuxiong Ding, Cheng Hui Chang, Joshua Haslam, Robert Timmerman, Timothy Solberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric characteristics of robotic and conventional linac-based SBRT techniques for lung cancer, and to provide planning guidance for each modality. Eight patients who received linac-based SBRT were retrospectively included in this study. A dose of 60 Gy given in three fractions was prescribed to each target. The Synchrony Respiratory Tracking System and a 4D dose calculation methodology were used for CyberKnife and linac-based SBRT, respectively, to minimize respiratory impact on dose calculation. Identical image and contour sets were used for both modalities. While both modalities can provide satisfactory target dose coverage, the dose to GTV was more heterogeneous for CyberKnife than for linac planning/delivery in all cases. The dose to 1000 cc lung was well below institutional constraints for both modalities. In the high dose region, the lung dose depended on tumor size, and was similar between both modalities. In the low dose region, however, the quality of CyberKnife plans was dependent on tumor location. With anteriorly-located tumors, the CyberKnife may deliver less dose to normal lung than linac techniques. Conversely, for posteriorly-located tumors, CyberKnife delivery may result in higher doses to normal lung. In all cases studied, more monitor units were required for CyberKnife delivery for given prescription. Both conventional linacs and CyberKnife provide acceptable target dose coverage while sparing normal tissues. The results of this study provide a general guideline for patient and treatment modality selection based on dosimetric, tumor and normal tissue sparing considerations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-224
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume11
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Robotics
robotics
lungs
Tumors
radiation therapy
Lung Neoplasms
cancer
dosage
Lung
Neoplasms
tumors
Tissue
Planning
delivery
Respiratory System
Prescriptions
planning
Guidelines
monitors

Keywords

  • 4D CT
  • CyberKnife
  • Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
  • Synchrony respiratory tracking system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation

Cite this

A dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for lung cancer : Robotic versus conventional linac-based systems. / Ding, Chuxiong; Chang, Cheng Hui; Haslam, Joshua; Timmerman, Robert; Solberg, Timothy.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2010, p. 212-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1b6ebd8824f470cb9e39b305999a0cd,
title = "A dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for lung cancer: Robotic versus conventional linac-based systems",
abstract = "The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric characteristics of robotic and conventional linac-based SBRT techniques for lung cancer, and to provide planning guidance for each modality. Eight patients who received linac-based SBRT were retrospectively included in this study. A dose of 60 Gy given in three fractions was prescribed to each target. The Synchrony Respiratory Tracking System and a 4D dose calculation methodology were used for CyberKnife and linac-based SBRT, respectively, to minimize respiratory impact on dose calculation. Identical image and contour sets were used for both modalities. While both modalities can provide satisfactory target dose coverage, the dose to GTV was more heterogeneous for CyberKnife than for linac planning/delivery in all cases. The dose to 1000 cc lung was well below institutional constraints for both modalities. In the high dose region, the lung dose depended on tumor size, and was similar between both modalities. In the low dose region, however, the quality of CyberKnife plans was dependent on tumor location. With anteriorly-located tumors, the CyberKnife may deliver less dose to normal lung than linac techniques. Conversely, for posteriorly-located tumors, CyberKnife delivery may result in higher doses to normal lung. In all cases studied, more monitor units were required for CyberKnife delivery for given prescription. Both conventional linacs and CyberKnife provide acceptable target dose coverage while sparing normal tissues. The results of this study provide a general guideline for patient and treatment modality selection based on dosimetric, tumor and normal tissue sparing considerations.",
keywords = "4D CT, CyberKnife, Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), Synchrony respiratory tracking system",
author = "Chuxiong Ding and Chang, {Cheng Hui} and Joshua Haslam and Robert Timmerman and Timothy Solberg",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "212--224",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A dosimetric comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for lung cancer

T2 - Robotic versus conventional linac-based systems

AU - Ding, Chuxiong

AU - Chang, Cheng Hui

AU - Haslam, Joshua

AU - Timmerman, Robert

AU - Solberg, Timothy

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric characteristics of robotic and conventional linac-based SBRT techniques for lung cancer, and to provide planning guidance for each modality. Eight patients who received linac-based SBRT were retrospectively included in this study. A dose of 60 Gy given in three fractions was prescribed to each target. The Synchrony Respiratory Tracking System and a 4D dose calculation methodology were used for CyberKnife and linac-based SBRT, respectively, to minimize respiratory impact on dose calculation. Identical image and contour sets were used for both modalities. While both modalities can provide satisfactory target dose coverage, the dose to GTV was more heterogeneous for CyberKnife than for linac planning/delivery in all cases. The dose to 1000 cc lung was well below institutional constraints for both modalities. In the high dose region, the lung dose depended on tumor size, and was similar between both modalities. In the low dose region, however, the quality of CyberKnife plans was dependent on tumor location. With anteriorly-located tumors, the CyberKnife may deliver less dose to normal lung than linac techniques. Conversely, for posteriorly-located tumors, CyberKnife delivery may result in higher doses to normal lung. In all cases studied, more monitor units were required for CyberKnife delivery for given prescription. Both conventional linacs and CyberKnife provide acceptable target dose coverage while sparing normal tissues. The results of this study provide a general guideline for patient and treatment modality selection based on dosimetric, tumor and normal tissue sparing considerations.

AB - The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric characteristics of robotic and conventional linac-based SBRT techniques for lung cancer, and to provide planning guidance for each modality. Eight patients who received linac-based SBRT were retrospectively included in this study. A dose of 60 Gy given in three fractions was prescribed to each target. The Synchrony Respiratory Tracking System and a 4D dose calculation methodology were used for CyberKnife and linac-based SBRT, respectively, to minimize respiratory impact on dose calculation. Identical image and contour sets were used for both modalities. While both modalities can provide satisfactory target dose coverage, the dose to GTV was more heterogeneous for CyberKnife than for linac planning/delivery in all cases. The dose to 1000 cc lung was well below institutional constraints for both modalities. In the high dose region, the lung dose depended on tumor size, and was similar between both modalities. In the low dose region, however, the quality of CyberKnife plans was dependent on tumor location. With anteriorly-located tumors, the CyberKnife may deliver less dose to normal lung than linac techniques. Conversely, for posteriorly-located tumors, CyberKnife delivery may result in higher doses to normal lung. In all cases studied, more monitor units were required for CyberKnife delivery for given prescription. Both conventional linacs and CyberKnife provide acceptable target dose coverage while sparing normal tissues. The results of this study provide a general guideline for patient and treatment modality selection based on dosimetric, tumor and normal tissue sparing considerations.

KW - 4D CT

KW - CyberKnife

KW - Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

KW - Synchrony respiratory tracking system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956995888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956995888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 212

EP - 224

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 3

ER -