A method comparison of photovoice and content analysis: Research examining challenges and supports of family caregivers

Mary Ann Faucher, Shelby L. Garner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this manuscript is to compare methods and thematic representations of the challenges and supports of family caregivers identified with photovoice methodology contrasted with content analysis, a more traditional qualitative approach. Methods: Results from a photovoice study utilizing a participatory action research framework was compared to an analysis of the audio-transcripts from that study utilizing content analysis methodology. Results: Major similarities between the results are identified with some notable differences. Content analysis provides a more in-depth and abstract elucidation of the nature of the challenges and supports of the family caregiver. Conclusions: The comparison provides evidence to support the trustworthiness of photovoice methodology with limitations identified. The enhanced elaboration of theme and categories with content analysis may have some advantages relevant to the utilization of this knowledge by health care professionals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-267
Number of pages6
JournalApplied Nursing Research
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Health Services Research
Research

Keywords

  • Challenges and supports of family caregivers
  • Content analysis
  • Photovoice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

A method comparison of photovoice and content analysis : Research examining challenges and supports of family caregivers. / Faucher, Mary Ann; Garner, Shelby L.

In: Applied Nursing Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.11.2015, p. 262-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1adff2111e0245b78d9eb0c30d6ba0a2,
title = "A method comparison of photovoice and content analysis: Research examining challenges and supports of family caregivers",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this manuscript is to compare methods and thematic representations of the challenges and supports of family caregivers identified with photovoice methodology contrasted with content analysis, a more traditional qualitative approach. Methods: Results from a photovoice study utilizing a participatory action research framework was compared to an analysis of the audio-transcripts from that study utilizing content analysis methodology. Results: Major similarities between the results are identified with some notable differences. Content analysis provides a more in-depth and abstract elucidation of the nature of the challenges and supports of the family caregiver. Conclusions: The comparison provides evidence to support the trustworthiness of photovoice methodology with limitations identified. The enhanced elaboration of theme and categories with content analysis may have some advantages relevant to the utilization of this knowledge by health care professionals.",
keywords = "Challenges and supports of family caregivers, Content analysis, Photovoice",
author = "Faucher, {Mary Ann} and Garner, {Shelby L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apnr.2015.02.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "262--267",
journal = "Applied Nursing Research",
issn = "0897-1897",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method comparison of photovoice and content analysis

T2 - Research examining challenges and supports of family caregivers

AU - Faucher, Mary Ann

AU - Garner, Shelby L.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this manuscript is to compare methods and thematic representations of the challenges and supports of family caregivers identified with photovoice methodology contrasted with content analysis, a more traditional qualitative approach. Methods: Results from a photovoice study utilizing a participatory action research framework was compared to an analysis of the audio-transcripts from that study utilizing content analysis methodology. Results: Major similarities between the results are identified with some notable differences. Content analysis provides a more in-depth and abstract elucidation of the nature of the challenges and supports of the family caregiver. Conclusions: The comparison provides evidence to support the trustworthiness of photovoice methodology with limitations identified. The enhanced elaboration of theme and categories with content analysis may have some advantages relevant to the utilization of this knowledge by health care professionals.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this manuscript is to compare methods and thematic representations of the challenges and supports of family caregivers identified with photovoice methodology contrasted with content analysis, a more traditional qualitative approach. Methods: Results from a photovoice study utilizing a participatory action research framework was compared to an analysis of the audio-transcripts from that study utilizing content analysis methodology. Results: Major similarities between the results are identified with some notable differences. Content analysis provides a more in-depth and abstract elucidation of the nature of the challenges and supports of the family caregiver. Conclusions: The comparison provides evidence to support the trustworthiness of photovoice methodology with limitations identified. The enhanced elaboration of theme and categories with content analysis may have some advantages relevant to the utilization of this knowledge by health care professionals.

KW - Challenges and supports of family caregivers

KW - Content analysis

KW - Photovoice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952326239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952326239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.02.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 26608423

AN - SCOPUS:84952326239

VL - 28

SP - 262

EP - 267

JO - Applied Nursing Research

JF - Applied Nursing Research

SN - 0897-1897

IS - 4

ER -