A multi-institutional analysis of laparoscopic orchidopexy

Linda A Baker, S. G. Docimo, I. Surer, Craig A Peters, L. Cisek, D. A. Diamond, A. Caldamone, M. Koyle, W. Strand, R. Moore, R. Mevorach, J. Brady, G. Jordan, M. Erhard, I. Franco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To combine and analyse the results from centres with a large experience of laparoscopy for the impalpable testis with small series, to determine the expected success rate for laparoscopic orchidopexy. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to participating paediatric urologists; each contributor retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts for their cases of therapeutic laparoscopy for an impalpable testis. Detailing 36 variables for each patient. The data were collated centrally into a computerized database. For inclusion, the testis was intra-abdominal (including 'peeping' at the internal ring) at laparoscopic examination, was not managed through an open approach and did not undergo orchidectomy. Three surgical groups were assessed, with success defined as lack of atrophy and intrascrotal position: group 1, primary laparoscopic orchidopexy; group 2, a onestage Fowler-Stephens (F-S) orchidopexy; and group 3. A two-stage F-S orchidopexy. Results: Data were gathered from 10 centres in the USA, covering the period 1990-1999; 252 patients representing 310 testes were included and overall, 15.2% were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between success rates in the larger and smaller series. Atrophy occurred in 2.2% of 178 testes, 22.2% of 27 testes and 10.3% of 58 testes in groups 1-3, respectively. Testes were not in a satisfactory scrotal position in 0.6%, 7.4% and 1.7% of groups 1-3, respectively. The mean follow-up for each group was 7.7, 8.6 and 20.0 months, respectively. The overall success for all groups was 92.8% (97.2% group 1; 74.1% group 2; 87.9% group 3), with an atrophy rate of 6.1%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic orchidopexy for the intraabdominal testis, in both large and small series, can be expected to have a success rate higher than that historically ascribed to open orchidopexy. Within this series, single-stage F-S laparoscopic orchidopexy resulted in a significantly higher atrophy rate than the two-stage repair. However, when considering both F-S approaches, the laparoscopic approach gave greater success than previously reported for the same open approaches. Despite the weaknesses inherent in a retrospective unrandomized study, we conclude that laparoscopic orchidopexy is, if not the procedure of choice, an acceptable and successful approach to the impalpable undescended testicle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)484-489
Number of pages6
JournalBJU International
Volume87
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Orchiopexy
Testis
Atrophy
Laparoscopy
Orchiectomy
Lost to Follow-Up
Retrospective Studies
Databases
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Combined analysis
  • Impalpable
  • Laparoscopic
  • Orchidopexy
  • Outcome
  • Testis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

A multi-institutional analysis of laparoscopic orchidopexy. / Baker, Linda A; Docimo, S. G.; Surer, I.; Peters, Craig A; Cisek, L.; Diamond, D. A.; Caldamone, A.; Koyle, M.; Strand, W.; Moore, R.; Mevorach, R.; Brady, J.; Jordan, G.; Erhard, M.; Franco, I.

In: BJU International, Vol. 87, No. 6, 2001, p. 484-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baker, LA, Docimo, SG, Surer, I, Peters, CA, Cisek, L, Diamond, DA, Caldamone, A, Koyle, M, Strand, W, Moore, R, Mevorach, R, Brady, J, Jordan, G, Erhard, M & Franco, I 2001, 'A multi-institutional analysis of laparoscopic orchidopexy', BJU International, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 484-489. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00127.x
Baker, Linda A ; Docimo, S. G. ; Surer, I. ; Peters, Craig A ; Cisek, L. ; Diamond, D. A. ; Caldamone, A. ; Koyle, M. ; Strand, W. ; Moore, R. ; Mevorach, R. ; Brady, J. ; Jordan, G. ; Erhard, M. ; Franco, I. / A multi-institutional analysis of laparoscopic orchidopexy. In: BJU International. 2001 ; Vol. 87, No. 6. pp. 484-489.
@article{019598c88e1146cea739c702a9ade039,
title = "A multi-institutional analysis of laparoscopic orchidopexy",
abstract = "Objective: To combine and analyse the results from centres with a large experience of laparoscopy for the impalpable testis with small series, to determine the expected success rate for laparoscopic orchidopexy. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to participating paediatric urologists; each contributor retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts for their cases of therapeutic laparoscopy for an impalpable testis. Detailing 36 variables for each patient. The data were collated centrally into a computerized database. For inclusion, the testis was intra-abdominal (including 'peeping' at the internal ring) at laparoscopic examination, was not managed through an open approach and did not undergo orchidectomy. Three surgical groups were assessed, with success defined as lack of atrophy and intrascrotal position: group 1, primary laparoscopic orchidopexy; group 2, a onestage Fowler-Stephens (F-S) orchidopexy; and group 3. A two-stage F-S orchidopexy. Results: Data were gathered from 10 centres in the USA, covering the period 1990-1999; 252 patients representing 310 testes were included and overall, 15.2{\%} were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between success rates in the larger and smaller series. Atrophy occurred in 2.2{\%} of 178 testes, 22.2{\%} of 27 testes and 10.3{\%} of 58 testes in groups 1-3, respectively. Testes were not in a satisfactory scrotal position in 0.6{\%}, 7.4{\%} and 1.7{\%} of groups 1-3, respectively. The mean follow-up for each group was 7.7, 8.6 and 20.0 months, respectively. The overall success for all groups was 92.8{\%} (97.2{\%} group 1; 74.1{\%} group 2; 87.9{\%} group 3), with an atrophy rate of 6.1{\%}. Conclusion: Laparoscopic orchidopexy for the intraabdominal testis, in both large and small series, can be expected to have a success rate higher than that historically ascribed to open orchidopexy. Within this series, single-stage F-S laparoscopic orchidopexy resulted in a significantly higher atrophy rate than the two-stage repair. However, when considering both F-S approaches, the laparoscopic approach gave greater success than previously reported for the same open approaches. Despite the weaknesses inherent in a retrospective unrandomized study, we conclude that laparoscopic orchidopexy is, if not the procedure of choice, an acceptable and successful approach to the impalpable undescended testicle.",
keywords = "Combined analysis, Impalpable, Laparoscopic, Orchidopexy, Outcome, Testis",
author = "Baker, {Linda A} and Docimo, {S. G.} and I. Surer and Peters, {Craig A} and L. Cisek and Diamond, {D. A.} and A. Caldamone and M. Koyle and W. Strand and R. Moore and R. Mevorach and J. Brady and G. Jordan and M. Erhard and I. Franco",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00127.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "484--489",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-institutional analysis of laparoscopic orchidopexy

AU - Baker, Linda A

AU - Docimo, S. G.

AU - Surer, I.

AU - Peters, Craig A

AU - Cisek, L.

AU - Diamond, D. A.

AU - Caldamone, A.

AU - Koyle, M.

AU - Strand, W.

AU - Moore, R.

AU - Mevorach, R.

AU - Brady, J.

AU - Jordan, G.

AU - Erhard, M.

AU - Franco, I.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To combine and analyse the results from centres with a large experience of laparoscopy for the impalpable testis with small series, to determine the expected success rate for laparoscopic orchidopexy. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to participating paediatric urologists; each contributor retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts for their cases of therapeutic laparoscopy for an impalpable testis. Detailing 36 variables for each patient. The data were collated centrally into a computerized database. For inclusion, the testis was intra-abdominal (including 'peeping' at the internal ring) at laparoscopic examination, was not managed through an open approach and did not undergo orchidectomy. Three surgical groups were assessed, with success defined as lack of atrophy and intrascrotal position: group 1, primary laparoscopic orchidopexy; group 2, a onestage Fowler-Stephens (F-S) orchidopexy; and group 3. A two-stage F-S orchidopexy. Results: Data were gathered from 10 centres in the USA, covering the period 1990-1999; 252 patients representing 310 testes were included and overall, 15.2% were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between success rates in the larger and smaller series. Atrophy occurred in 2.2% of 178 testes, 22.2% of 27 testes and 10.3% of 58 testes in groups 1-3, respectively. Testes were not in a satisfactory scrotal position in 0.6%, 7.4% and 1.7% of groups 1-3, respectively. The mean follow-up for each group was 7.7, 8.6 and 20.0 months, respectively. The overall success for all groups was 92.8% (97.2% group 1; 74.1% group 2; 87.9% group 3), with an atrophy rate of 6.1%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic orchidopexy for the intraabdominal testis, in both large and small series, can be expected to have a success rate higher than that historically ascribed to open orchidopexy. Within this series, single-stage F-S laparoscopic orchidopexy resulted in a significantly higher atrophy rate than the two-stage repair. However, when considering both F-S approaches, the laparoscopic approach gave greater success than previously reported for the same open approaches. Despite the weaknesses inherent in a retrospective unrandomized study, we conclude that laparoscopic orchidopexy is, if not the procedure of choice, an acceptable and successful approach to the impalpable undescended testicle.

AB - Objective: To combine and analyse the results from centres with a large experience of laparoscopy for the impalpable testis with small series, to determine the expected success rate for laparoscopic orchidopexy. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to participating paediatric urologists; each contributor retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts for their cases of therapeutic laparoscopy for an impalpable testis. Detailing 36 variables for each patient. The data were collated centrally into a computerized database. For inclusion, the testis was intra-abdominal (including 'peeping' at the internal ring) at laparoscopic examination, was not managed through an open approach and did not undergo orchidectomy. Three surgical groups were assessed, with success defined as lack of atrophy and intrascrotal position: group 1, primary laparoscopic orchidopexy; group 2, a onestage Fowler-Stephens (F-S) orchidopexy; and group 3. A two-stage F-S orchidopexy. Results: Data were gathered from 10 centres in the USA, covering the period 1990-1999; 252 patients representing 310 testes were included and overall, 15.2% were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between success rates in the larger and smaller series. Atrophy occurred in 2.2% of 178 testes, 22.2% of 27 testes and 10.3% of 58 testes in groups 1-3, respectively. Testes were not in a satisfactory scrotal position in 0.6%, 7.4% and 1.7% of groups 1-3, respectively. The mean follow-up for each group was 7.7, 8.6 and 20.0 months, respectively. The overall success for all groups was 92.8% (97.2% group 1; 74.1% group 2; 87.9% group 3), with an atrophy rate of 6.1%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic orchidopexy for the intraabdominal testis, in both large and small series, can be expected to have a success rate higher than that historically ascribed to open orchidopexy. Within this series, single-stage F-S laparoscopic orchidopexy resulted in a significantly higher atrophy rate than the two-stage repair. However, when considering both F-S approaches, the laparoscopic approach gave greater success than previously reported for the same open approaches. Despite the weaknesses inherent in a retrospective unrandomized study, we conclude that laparoscopic orchidopexy is, if not the procedure of choice, an acceptable and successful approach to the impalpable undescended testicle.

KW - Combined analysis

KW - Impalpable

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Orchidopexy

KW - Outcome

KW - Testis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035071582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035071582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00127.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00127.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 11298039

AN - SCOPUS:0035071582

VL - 87

SP - 484

EP - 489

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 6

ER -