A note on methodological fallacies in the "X% fallacy" literature.

C. E. McConnel

doi:10.2190/BCM0-BH5N-5PF5-L8YD

A note on methodological fallacies in the "X% fallacy" literature.

C. E. McConnel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article demonstrates that the numerical estimate of an approximately 25 percent risk of nursing home institutionalization reported in the "4-5% fallacy" literature is based on an invalid set of implicit assumptions. Using the most recent national level statistics on nursing home residency and discharge, a measurement technique is introduced to provide an estimate of the maximum and minimum number of nursing home residents in 1976, and a corresponding range for the annualized risk of institutionalization between 6 and 9 percent, within which the true risk must lie.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	57-69
Number of pages	13
Journal	International journal of aging & human development
Volume	17
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2190/BCM0-BH5N-5PF5-L8YD
State	Published - 1983

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Aging
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Geriatrics and Gerontology

Access to Document

10.2190/BCM0-BH5N-5PF5-L8YD

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A note on methodological fallacies in the "X% fallacy" literature.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{194854307d3944e69c30c92d6805dc52,

title = "A note on methodological fallacies in the {"}X% fallacy{"} literature.",

abstract = "This article demonstrates that the numerical estimate of an approximately 25 percent risk of nursing home institutionalization reported in the {"}4-5% fallacy{"} literature is based on an invalid set of implicit assumptions. Using the most recent national level statistics on nursing home residency and discharge, a measurement technique is introduced to provide an estimate of the maximum and minimum number of nursing home residents in 1976, and a corresponding range for the annualized risk of institutionalization between 6 and 9 percent, within which the true risk must lie.",

author = "McConnel, {C. E.}",

year = "1983",

doi = "10.2190/BCM0-BH5N-5PF5-L8YD",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "17",

pages = "57--69",

journal = "International Journal of Aging and Human Development",

issn = "0091-4150",

publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on methodological fallacies in the "X% fallacy" literature.

AU - McConnel, C. E.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - This article demonstrates that the numerical estimate of an approximately 25 percent risk of nursing home institutionalization reported in the "4-5% fallacy" literature is based on an invalid set of implicit assumptions. Using the most recent national level statistics on nursing home residency and discharge, a measurement technique is introduced to provide an estimate of the maximum and minimum number of nursing home residents in 1976, and a corresponding range for the annualized risk of institutionalization between 6 and 9 percent, within which the true risk must lie.

AB - This article demonstrates that the numerical estimate of an approximately 25 percent risk of nursing home institutionalization reported in the "4-5% fallacy" literature is based on an invalid set of implicit assumptions. Using the most recent national level statistics on nursing home residency and discharge, a measurement technique is introduced to provide an estimate of the maximum and minimum number of nursing home residents in 1976, and a corresponding range for the annualized risk of institutionalization between 6 and 9 percent, within which the true risk must lie.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020989279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020989279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2190/BCM0-BH5N-5PF5-L8YD

DO - 10.2190/BCM0-BH5N-5PF5-L8YD

M3 - Article

C2 - 6671806

AN - SCOPUS:0020989279

VL - 17

SP - 57

EP - 69

JO - International Journal of Aging and Human Development

JF - International Journal of Aging and Human Development

SN - 0091-4150

IS - 1

ER -

A note on methodological fallacies in the "X% fallacy" literature.

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this