A prospective, randomized comparison of cobra perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway unique in pediatric patients

Peter Szmuk, Oscar Ghelber, Maria Matuszczak, Marry F. Rabb, Tiberiu Ezri, Daniel I. Sessler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (PLA) provides better sealing pressure than the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique (LMAU) during positive-pressure ventilation in adults. We compared the performance of the CobraPLA and LMAU in infants and children. METHODS: Two-hundred pediatric patients were randomly assigned to a CobraPLA or an Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). We measured airway sealing at cuff inflation pressures of 40 and 60 cm H2O; ease and time of insertion; device stability; efficacy of ventilation; number of insertion attempts; incidence of postoperative sore throat, dysphonia, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and gastric gas insufflation. Steady-state end-tidalCO2 was measured at the head of the CobraPLA and at the "Y-piece" piece of the anesthetic circuit. For the major outcomes, the airway groups were subdivided post hoc into small and large CobraPLA and small and large LMA subgroups. Results are presented as means ± sds; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Airway sealing pressure with the cuff inflated to 60 cm H2O in the large CobraPLA subgroup (22 ± 7 cm H2O) was significantly more than that of the small CobraPLA subgroup (18 ± 5 cm H2O) and large LMA subgroup (16 ± 5 cm H2O; P < 0.001). The CobraPLA was more stable than the LMA (same anatomic fit score before and after surgery) and produced less gastric insufflation. Head CobraPLA end-tidalCO2 values were 6.4 ± 6 mm Hg more than those of the Y piece of the circle circuit. CONCLUSIONS: The CobraPLA airway performed as well as the LMAU during anesthesia in pediatric patients for a large range of outcomes and was superior for some.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1523-1530
Number of pages8
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume107
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Elapidae
Laryngeal Masks
Pediatrics
Insufflation
Pressure
Stomach
Head
Laryngismus
Dysphonia
Bronchial Spasm
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Pharyngitis
Economic Inflation
Ventilation
Anesthetics
Anesthesia
Gases
Equipment and Supplies
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

A prospective, randomized comparison of cobra perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway unique in pediatric patients. / Szmuk, Peter; Ghelber, Oscar; Matuszczak, Maria; Rabb, Marry F.; Ezri, Tiberiu; Sessler, Daniel I.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 107, No. 5, 11.2008, p. 1523-1530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Szmuk, Peter ; Ghelber, Oscar ; Matuszczak, Maria ; Rabb, Marry F. ; Ezri, Tiberiu ; Sessler, Daniel I. / A prospective, randomized comparison of cobra perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway unique in pediatric patients. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2008 ; Vol. 107, No. 5. pp. 1523-1530.
@article{59b3f56fbe3d4e5e84b5ee80b790ec30,
title = "A prospective, randomized comparison of cobra perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway unique in pediatric patients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (PLA) provides better sealing pressure than the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique (LMAU) during positive-pressure ventilation in adults. We compared the performance of the CobraPLA and LMAU in infants and children. METHODS: Two-hundred pediatric patients were randomly assigned to a CobraPLA or an Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). We measured airway sealing at cuff inflation pressures of 40 and 60 cm H2O; ease and time of insertion; device stability; efficacy of ventilation; number of insertion attempts; incidence of postoperative sore throat, dysphonia, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and gastric gas insufflation. Steady-state end-tidalCO2 was measured at the head of the CobraPLA and at the {"}Y-piece{"} piece of the anesthetic circuit. For the major outcomes, the airway groups were subdivided post hoc into small and large CobraPLA and small and large LMA subgroups. Results are presented as means ± sds; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Airway sealing pressure with the cuff inflated to 60 cm H2O in the large CobraPLA subgroup (22 ± 7 cm H2O) was significantly more than that of the small CobraPLA subgroup (18 ± 5 cm H2O) and large LMA subgroup (16 ± 5 cm H2O; P < 0.001). The CobraPLA was more stable than the LMA (same anatomic fit score before and after surgery) and produced less gastric insufflation. Head CobraPLA end-tidalCO2 values were 6.4 ± 6 mm Hg more than those of the Y piece of the circle circuit. CONCLUSIONS: The CobraPLA airway performed as well as the LMAU during anesthesia in pediatric patients for a large range of outcomes and was superior for some.",
author = "Peter Szmuk and Oscar Ghelber and Maria Matuszczak and Rabb, {Marry F.} and Tiberiu Ezri and Sessler, {Daniel I.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1213/ane.0b013e3181852617",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "1523--1530",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective, randomized comparison of cobra perilaryngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway unique in pediatric patients

AU - Szmuk, Peter

AU - Ghelber, Oscar

AU - Matuszczak, Maria

AU - Rabb, Marry F.

AU - Ezri, Tiberiu

AU - Sessler, Daniel I.

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (PLA) provides better sealing pressure than the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique (LMAU) during positive-pressure ventilation in adults. We compared the performance of the CobraPLA and LMAU in infants and children. METHODS: Two-hundred pediatric patients were randomly assigned to a CobraPLA or an Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). We measured airway sealing at cuff inflation pressures of 40 and 60 cm H2O; ease and time of insertion; device stability; efficacy of ventilation; number of insertion attempts; incidence of postoperative sore throat, dysphonia, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and gastric gas insufflation. Steady-state end-tidalCO2 was measured at the head of the CobraPLA and at the "Y-piece" piece of the anesthetic circuit. For the major outcomes, the airway groups were subdivided post hoc into small and large CobraPLA and small and large LMA subgroups. Results are presented as means ± sds; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Airway sealing pressure with the cuff inflated to 60 cm H2O in the large CobraPLA subgroup (22 ± 7 cm H2O) was significantly more than that of the small CobraPLA subgroup (18 ± 5 cm H2O) and large LMA subgroup (16 ± 5 cm H2O; P < 0.001). The CobraPLA was more stable than the LMA (same anatomic fit score before and after surgery) and produced less gastric insufflation. Head CobraPLA end-tidalCO2 values were 6.4 ± 6 mm Hg more than those of the Y piece of the circle circuit. CONCLUSIONS: The CobraPLA airway performed as well as the LMAU during anesthesia in pediatric patients for a large range of outcomes and was superior for some.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (PLA) provides better sealing pressure than the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique (LMAU) during positive-pressure ventilation in adults. We compared the performance of the CobraPLA and LMAU in infants and children. METHODS: Two-hundred pediatric patients were randomly assigned to a CobraPLA or an Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). We measured airway sealing at cuff inflation pressures of 40 and 60 cm H2O; ease and time of insertion; device stability; efficacy of ventilation; number of insertion attempts; incidence of postoperative sore throat, dysphonia, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, and gastric gas insufflation. Steady-state end-tidalCO2 was measured at the head of the CobraPLA and at the "Y-piece" piece of the anesthetic circuit. For the major outcomes, the airway groups were subdivided post hoc into small and large CobraPLA and small and large LMA subgroups. Results are presented as means ± sds; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Airway sealing pressure with the cuff inflated to 60 cm H2O in the large CobraPLA subgroup (22 ± 7 cm H2O) was significantly more than that of the small CobraPLA subgroup (18 ± 5 cm H2O) and large LMA subgroup (16 ± 5 cm H2O; P < 0.001). The CobraPLA was more stable than the LMA (same anatomic fit score before and after surgery) and produced less gastric insufflation. Head CobraPLA end-tidalCO2 values were 6.4 ± 6 mm Hg more than those of the Y piece of the circle circuit. CONCLUSIONS: The CobraPLA airway performed as well as the LMAU during anesthesia in pediatric patients for a large range of outcomes and was superior for some.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56149112888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56149112888&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181852617

DO - 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181852617

M3 - Article

C2 - 18931209

AN - SCOPUS:56149112888

VL - 107

SP - 1523

EP - 1530

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 5

ER -