A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Computed Tomography with Conventional Diagnostic Methods in the Evaluation of Penetrating Injuries to the Back and Flank

David W. Easter, Steven R. Shackford, Robert F. Mattrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We prospectively compared computed tomography with conventional diagnostic methods in the evaluation of penetrating injuries to the back and flank in 85 patients. Immediate laparotomy was performed in 24 patients because of physical findings, and these patients were not randomized. Nine unnecessary operations were performed in this group, and these nine patients had significantly higher hospital costs than patients in either randomized group. In the randomized patients, there were only three true-positive and three false-positive findings. Both computed tomographic evaluation (31 patients) and conventional evaluation (30 patients) were highly accurate and specific for injuries that required operation. Evaluation with computed tomography required a longer time to make a hospital disposition but required fewer diagnostic tests. Computed tomography can be useful in the assessment of penetrating injuries to the back and flank.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1115-1119
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume126
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Back Injuries
Tomography
Hospital Costs
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Laparotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Computed Tomography with Conventional Diagnostic Methods in the Evaluation of Penetrating Injuries to the Back and Flank. / Easter, David W.; Shackford, Steven R.; Mattrey, Robert F.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 126, No. 9, 01.01.1991, p. 1115-1119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86166adaa53247d6a3e7ddcf867d3e1a,
title = "A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Computed Tomography with Conventional Diagnostic Methods in the Evaluation of Penetrating Injuries to the Back and Flank",
abstract = "We prospectively compared computed tomography with conventional diagnostic methods in the evaluation of penetrating injuries to the back and flank in 85 patients. Immediate laparotomy was performed in 24 patients because of physical findings, and these patients were not randomized. Nine unnecessary operations were performed in this group, and these nine patients had significantly higher hospital costs than patients in either randomized group. In the randomized patients, there were only three true-positive and three false-positive findings. Both computed tomographic evaluation (31 patients) and conventional evaluation (30 patients) were highly accurate and specific for injuries that required operation. Evaluation with computed tomography required a longer time to make a hospital disposition but required fewer diagnostic tests. Computed tomography can be useful in the assessment of penetrating injuries to the back and flank.",
author = "Easter, {David W.} and Shackford, {Steven R.} and Mattrey, {Robert F.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410330073011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "1115--1119",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Computed Tomography with Conventional Diagnostic Methods in the Evaluation of Penetrating Injuries to the Back and Flank

AU - Easter, David W.

AU - Shackford, Steven R.

AU - Mattrey, Robert F.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - We prospectively compared computed tomography with conventional diagnostic methods in the evaluation of penetrating injuries to the back and flank in 85 patients. Immediate laparotomy was performed in 24 patients because of physical findings, and these patients were not randomized. Nine unnecessary operations were performed in this group, and these nine patients had significantly higher hospital costs than patients in either randomized group. In the randomized patients, there were only three true-positive and three false-positive findings. Both computed tomographic evaluation (31 patients) and conventional evaluation (30 patients) were highly accurate and specific for injuries that required operation. Evaluation with computed tomography required a longer time to make a hospital disposition but required fewer diagnostic tests. Computed tomography can be useful in the assessment of penetrating injuries to the back and flank.

AB - We prospectively compared computed tomography with conventional diagnostic methods in the evaluation of penetrating injuries to the back and flank in 85 patients. Immediate laparotomy was performed in 24 patients because of physical findings, and these patients were not randomized. Nine unnecessary operations were performed in this group, and these nine patients had significantly higher hospital costs than patients in either randomized group. In the randomized patients, there were only three true-positive and three false-positive findings. Both computed tomographic evaluation (31 patients) and conventional evaluation (30 patients) were highly accurate and specific for injuries that required operation. Evaluation with computed tomography required a longer time to make a hospital disposition but required fewer diagnostic tests. Computed tomography can be useful in the assessment of penetrating injuries to the back and flank.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026047176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026047176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410330073011

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410330073011

M3 - Article

C2 - 1929843

AN - SCOPUS:0026047176

VL - 126

SP - 1115

EP - 1119

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -