A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic cameras on ex vivo and in vivo NOTES surgical performance

Victoria C. Chang, Shou Jiang Tang, C. Paul Swain, Richard Bergs, Juan Paramo, Deborah C. Hogg, Raul Fernandez, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Daniel J Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The influence of endoscopic video camera (VC) image quality on surgical performance has not been studied. Flexible endoscopes are used as substitutes for laparoscopes in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), but their optics are originally designed for intralumenal use. Manipulable wired or wireless independent VCs might offer advantages for NOTES but are still under development. Objective. To measure the optical characteristics of 4 VC systems and to compare their impact on the performance of surgical suturing tasks. Methods. VC systems included a laparoscope (Storz 10 mm), a flexible endoscope (Olympus GIF 160), and 2 prototype deployable cameras (magnetic anchoring and guidance system [MAGS] Camera and PillCam). In a randomized fashion, the 4 systems were evaluated regarding standardized optical characteristics and surgical manipulations of previously validated ex vivo (fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery model) and in vivo (live porcine Nissen model) tasks; objective metrics (time and errors/precision) and combined surgeon (n = 2) performance were recorded. Results. Subtle differences were detected for color tests, and field of view was variable (65 -115 ). Suitable resolution was detected up to 10 cm for the laparoscope and MAGS camera but only at closer distances for the endoscope and PillCam. Compared with the laparoscope, surgical suturing performances were modestly lower for the MAGS camera and significantly lower for the endoscope (ex vivo) and PillCam (ex vivo and in vivo). Conclusions. This study documented distinct differences in VC systems that may be used for NOTES in terms of both optical characteristics and surgical performance. Additional work is warranted to optimize cameras for NOTES. Deployable systems may be especially well suited for this purpose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-402
Number of pages8
JournalSurgical Innovation
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopes
Endoscopes
Laparoscopy
Swine
Color

Keywords

  • camera systems
  • capsule endoscope
  • endoscopy
  • image quality
  • laparoscopy
  • magnetically anchored instruments
  • NOTES
  • surgeon performance
  • visualization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic cameras on ex vivo and in vivo NOTES surgical performance. / Chang, Victoria C.; Tang, Shou Jiang; Swain, C. Paul; Bergs, Richard; Paramo, Juan; Hogg, Deborah C.; Fernandez, Raul; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A; Scott, Daniel J.

In: Surgical Innovation, Vol. 20, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 395-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chang, Victoria C. ; Tang, Shou Jiang ; Swain, C. Paul ; Bergs, Richard ; Paramo, Juan ; Hogg, Deborah C. ; Fernandez, Raul ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ; Scott, Daniel J. / A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic cameras on ex vivo and in vivo NOTES surgical performance. In: Surgical Innovation. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 395-402.
@article{38eefe3bc4b64de2be212b1cedfc6662,
title = "A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic cameras on ex vivo and in vivo NOTES surgical performance",
abstract = "Background. The influence of endoscopic video camera (VC) image quality on surgical performance has not been studied. Flexible endoscopes are used as substitutes for laparoscopes in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), but their optics are originally designed for intralumenal use. Manipulable wired or wireless independent VCs might offer advantages for NOTES but are still under development. Objective. To measure the optical characteristics of 4 VC systems and to compare their impact on the performance of surgical suturing tasks. Methods. VC systems included a laparoscope (Storz 10 mm), a flexible endoscope (Olympus GIF 160), and 2 prototype deployable cameras (magnetic anchoring and guidance system [MAGS] Camera and PillCam). In a randomized fashion, the 4 systems were evaluated regarding standardized optical characteristics and surgical manipulations of previously validated ex vivo (fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery model) and in vivo (live porcine Nissen model) tasks; objective metrics (time and errors/precision) and combined surgeon (n = 2) performance were recorded. Results. Subtle differences were detected for color tests, and field of view was variable (65 -115 ). Suitable resolution was detected up to 10 cm for the laparoscope and MAGS camera but only at closer distances for the endoscope and PillCam. Compared with the laparoscope, surgical suturing performances were modestly lower for the MAGS camera and significantly lower for the endoscope (ex vivo) and PillCam (ex vivo and in vivo). Conclusions. This study documented distinct differences in VC systems that may be used for NOTES in terms of both optical characteristics and surgical performance. Additional work is warranted to optimize cameras for NOTES. Deployable systems may be especially well suited for this purpose.",
keywords = "camera systems, capsule endoscope, endoscopy, image quality, laparoscopy, magnetically anchored instruments, NOTES, surgeon performance, visualization",
author = "Chang, {Victoria C.} and Tang, {Shou Jiang} and Swain, {C. Paul} and Richard Bergs and Juan Paramo and Hogg, {Deborah C.} and Raul Fernandez and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A} and Scott, {Daniel J}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/1553350612459110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "395--402",
journal = "Surgical Innovation",
issn = "1553-3506",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic cameras on ex vivo and in vivo NOTES surgical performance

AU - Chang, Victoria C.

AU - Tang, Shou Jiang

AU - Swain, C. Paul

AU - Bergs, Richard

AU - Paramo, Juan

AU - Hogg, Deborah C.

AU - Fernandez, Raul

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

AU - Scott, Daniel J

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Background. The influence of endoscopic video camera (VC) image quality on surgical performance has not been studied. Flexible endoscopes are used as substitutes for laparoscopes in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), but their optics are originally designed for intralumenal use. Manipulable wired or wireless independent VCs might offer advantages for NOTES but are still under development. Objective. To measure the optical characteristics of 4 VC systems and to compare their impact on the performance of surgical suturing tasks. Methods. VC systems included a laparoscope (Storz 10 mm), a flexible endoscope (Olympus GIF 160), and 2 prototype deployable cameras (magnetic anchoring and guidance system [MAGS] Camera and PillCam). In a randomized fashion, the 4 systems were evaluated regarding standardized optical characteristics and surgical manipulations of previously validated ex vivo (fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery model) and in vivo (live porcine Nissen model) tasks; objective metrics (time and errors/precision) and combined surgeon (n = 2) performance were recorded. Results. Subtle differences were detected for color tests, and field of view was variable (65 -115 ). Suitable resolution was detected up to 10 cm for the laparoscope and MAGS camera but only at closer distances for the endoscope and PillCam. Compared with the laparoscope, surgical suturing performances were modestly lower for the MAGS camera and significantly lower for the endoscope (ex vivo) and PillCam (ex vivo and in vivo). Conclusions. This study documented distinct differences in VC systems that may be used for NOTES in terms of both optical characteristics and surgical performance. Additional work is warranted to optimize cameras for NOTES. Deployable systems may be especially well suited for this purpose.

AB - Background. The influence of endoscopic video camera (VC) image quality on surgical performance has not been studied. Flexible endoscopes are used as substitutes for laparoscopes in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), but their optics are originally designed for intralumenal use. Manipulable wired or wireless independent VCs might offer advantages for NOTES but are still under development. Objective. To measure the optical characteristics of 4 VC systems and to compare their impact on the performance of surgical suturing tasks. Methods. VC systems included a laparoscope (Storz 10 mm), a flexible endoscope (Olympus GIF 160), and 2 prototype deployable cameras (magnetic anchoring and guidance system [MAGS] Camera and PillCam). In a randomized fashion, the 4 systems were evaluated regarding standardized optical characteristics and surgical manipulations of previously validated ex vivo (fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery model) and in vivo (live porcine Nissen model) tasks; objective metrics (time and errors/precision) and combined surgeon (n = 2) performance were recorded. Results. Subtle differences were detected for color tests, and field of view was variable (65 -115 ). Suitable resolution was detected up to 10 cm for the laparoscope and MAGS camera but only at closer distances for the endoscope and PillCam. Compared with the laparoscope, surgical suturing performances were modestly lower for the MAGS camera and significantly lower for the endoscope (ex vivo) and PillCam (ex vivo and in vivo). Conclusions. This study documented distinct differences in VC systems that may be used for NOTES in terms of both optical characteristics and surgical performance. Additional work is warranted to optimize cameras for NOTES. Deployable systems may be especially well suited for this purpose.

KW - camera systems

KW - capsule endoscope

KW - endoscopy

KW - image quality

KW - laparoscopy

KW - magnetically anchored instruments

KW - NOTES

KW - surgeon performance

KW - visualization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880290389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880290389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1553350612459110

DO - 10.1177/1553350612459110

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 395

EP - 402

JO - Surgical Innovation

JF - Surgical Innovation

SN - 1553-3506

IS - 4

ER -