A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Learners' Decision-making, Anxiety, and Task Load During a Simulated Airway Crisis Using Two Difficult Airway Aids

Aditee P. Ambardekar, Eric B. Rosero, Ravi Bhoja, Jerry Green, Brett A. Rebal, Abu T. Minhajuddin, Matthew S. Kosemund, Oren T. Guttman, David W. Mercier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) difficult airway algorithm and the Vortex approach are difficult airway aids. Our objective was to demonstrate that a simpler cognitive model would facilitate improved decision-making during a process such as difficult airway management. We hypothesized the simpler Vortex approach would be associated with less anxiety and task load. Methods Medical students were randomized to the ASA algorithm (n = 33) or Vortex approach (n = 34). All learned basic airway techniques on day 1 of their rotation. Next, they watched a video of their respective aid then managed a simulated airway crisis. We assessed decision-making using a seven-point airway management score and a completeness score. Completeness was at least one attempt at each of four techniques (mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, intubation, and cricothyrotomy). Two validated tools, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index, were used to assess anxiety and task load. Results Students in the Vortex group had higher airway management scores [4.0 (interquartile range = 4.0 to 5.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0 to 4.0), P = 0.0003] and completeness (94.1% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.003). In the ASA group, the means (SD) of National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores of 55 or higher were observed in mental [61.4 (14.4)], temporal [62.3 (22.9)], and effort [57.1 (15.6)] domains. In the Vortex group, only the temporal load domain was 55 or higher [mean (SD) = 57.8 (25.4)]. There was no difference in anxiety. Conclusions Medical students perform better in a simulated airway crisis after training in the simpler Vortex approach to guide decision-making. Students in the ASA group had task load scores indicative of high cognitive load.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-103
Number of pages8
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trial
Anxiety
Airway Management
Vortex
Decision Making
Randomized Controlled Trials
Decision making
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
anxiety
decision making
Vortex flow
Medical Students
Completeness
medical student
Students
Group
management
Masks
Interquartile range
Intubation

Keywords

  • ASA
  • cognitive aids
  • difficult airway
  • education
  • Medical student
  • simulation
  • Vortex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

@article{cd55b95039da4d3b84f0654bfc05fd2c,
title = "A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Learners' Decision-making, Anxiety, and Task Load During a Simulated Airway Crisis Using Two Difficult Airway Aids",
abstract = "Introduction The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) difficult airway algorithm and the Vortex approach are difficult airway aids. Our objective was to demonstrate that a simpler cognitive model would facilitate improved decision-making during a process such as difficult airway management. We hypothesized the simpler Vortex approach would be associated with less anxiety and task load. Methods Medical students were randomized to the ASA algorithm (n = 33) or Vortex approach (n = 34). All learned basic airway techniques on day 1 of their rotation. Next, they watched a video of their respective aid then managed a simulated airway crisis. We assessed decision-making using a seven-point airway management score and a completeness score. Completeness was at least one attempt at each of four techniques (mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, intubation, and cricothyrotomy). Two validated tools, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index, were used to assess anxiety and task load. Results Students in the Vortex group had higher airway management scores [4.0 (interquartile range = 4.0 to 5.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0 to 4.0), P = 0.0003] and completeness (94.1{\%} vs. 63.6{\%}, P = 0.003). In the ASA group, the means (SD) of National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores of 55 or higher were observed in mental [61.4 (14.4)], temporal [62.3 (22.9)], and effort [57.1 (15.6)] domains. In the Vortex group, only the temporal load domain was 55 or higher [mean (SD) = 57.8 (25.4)]. There was no difference in anxiety. Conclusions Medical students perform better in a simulated airway crisis after training in the simpler Vortex approach to guide decision-making. Students in the ASA group had task load scores indicative of high cognitive load.",
keywords = "ASA, cognitive aids, difficult airway, education, Medical student, simulation, Vortex",
author = "Ambardekar, {Aditee P.} and Rosero, {Eric B.} and Ravi Bhoja and Jerry Green and Rebal, {Brett A.} and Minhajuddin, {Abu T.} and Kosemund, {Matthew S.} and Guttman, {Oren T.} and Mercier, {David W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SIH.0000000000000362",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "96--103",
journal = "Simulation in Healthcare",
issn = "1559-2332",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Learners' Decision-making, Anxiety, and Task Load During a Simulated Airway Crisis Using Two Difficult Airway Aids

AU - Ambardekar, Aditee P.

AU - Rosero, Eric B.

AU - Bhoja, Ravi

AU - Green, Jerry

AU - Rebal, Brett A.

AU - Minhajuddin, Abu T.

AU - Kosemund, Matthew S.

AU - Guttman, Oren T.

AU - Mercier, David W.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Introduction The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) difficult airway algorithm and the Vortex approach are difficult airway aids. Our objective was to demonstrate that a simpler cognitive model would facilitate improved decision-making during a process such as difficult airway management. We hypothesized the simpler Vortex approach would be associated with less anxiety and task load. Methods Medical students were randomized to the ASA algorithm (n = 33) or Vortex approach (n = 34). All learned basic airway techniques on day 1 of their rotation. Next, they watched a video of their respective aid then managed a simulated airway crisis. We assessed decision-making using a seven-point airway management score and a completeness score. Completeness was at least one attempt at each of four techniques (mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, intubation, and cricothyrotomy). Two validated tools, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index, were used to assess anxiety and task load. Results Students in the Vortex group had higher airway management scores [4.0 (interquartile range = 4.0 to 5.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0 to 4.0), P = 0.0003] and completeness (94.1% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.003). In the ASA group, the means (SD) of National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores of 55 or higher were observed in mental [61.4 (14.4)], temporal [62.3 (22.9)], and effort [57.1 (15.6)] domains. In the Vortex group, only the temporal load domain was 55 or higher [mean (SD) = 57.8 (25.4)]. There was no difference in anxiety. Conclusions Medical students perform better in a simulated airway crisis after training in the simpler Vortex approach to guide decision-making. Students in the ASA group had task load scores indicative of high cognitive load.

AB - Introduction The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) difficult airway algorithm and the Vortex approach are difficult airway aids. Our objective was to demonstrate that a simpler cognitive model would facilitate improved decision-making during a process such as difficult airway management. We hypothesized the simpler Vortex approach would be associated with less anxiety and task load. Methods Medical students were randomized to the ASA algorithm (n = 33) or Vortex approach (n = 34). All learned basic airway techniques on day 1 of their rotation. Next, they watched a video of their respective aid then managed a simulated airway crisis. We assessed decision-making using a seven-point airway management score and a completeness score. Completeness was at least one attempt at each of four techniques (mask ventilation, supraglottic airway, intubation, and cricothyrotomy). Two validated tools, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index, were used to assess anxiety and task load. Results Students in the Vortex group had higher airway management scores [4.0 (interquartile range = 4.0 to 5.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0 to 4.0), P = 0.0003] and completeness (94.1% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.003). In the ASA group, the means (SD) of National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores of 55 or higher were observed in mental [61.4 (14.4)], temporal [62.3 (22.9)], and effort [57.1 (15.6)] domains. In the Vortex group, only the temporal load domain was 55 or higher [mean (SD) = 57.8 (25.4)]. There was no difference in anxiety. Conclusions Medical students perform better in a simulated airway crisis after training in the simpler Vortex approach to guide decision-making. Students in the ASA group had task load scores indicative of high cognitive load.

KW - ASA

KW - cognitive aids

KW - difficult airway

KW - education

KW - Medical student

KW - simulation

KW - Vortex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064207237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064207237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000362

DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000362

M3 - Article

C2 - 30908420

AN - SCOPUS:85064207237

VL - 14

SP - 96

EP - 103

JO - Simulation in Healthcare

JF - Simulation in Healthcare

SN - 1559-2332

IS - 2

ER -