A randomized controlled trial comparing traditional training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to self-directed CPR learning in first year medical students: The two-person CPR study

Lynn P. Roppolo, Rahm Heymann, Paul Pepe, James Wagner, Bradford Commons, Ronna Miller, Emilie Allen, Leyla Horne, Michael P. Wainscott, Ahamed H. Idris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Aim: The primary purpose of this study was to compare two, shorter, self-directed methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education for healthcare professionals (HCP) to traditional training with a focus on the trainee's ability to perform two-person CPR. Methods: First-year medical students with either no prior CPR for HCP experience or prior training greater than 5 years were randomized to complete one of three courses: 1) HeartCode BLS System, 2) BLS Anytime, or 3) Traditional training. Only data from the adult CPR skills testing station was reviewed via video recording by certified CPR instructors and the Laerdal PC Skill Reporter software program (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Results: There were 180 first-year medical students who met inclusion criteria: 68 were HeartCode BLS System, 53 BLS Anytime group, and 59 traditional group Regarding two-person CPR, 57 (84%) of Heartcode BLS students and 43 (81%) of BLS Anytime students were able to initiate the switch compared to 39 (66%) of traditional course students (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the quality of chest compressions or ventilations between the three groups. There was a trend for a much higher CPR skills testing pass rate for the traditional course students. However, failure to "clear to analyze or shock" while using the AED was the most common reason for failure in all groups. Conclusion: The self-directed learning groups not only had a high level of success in initiating the "switch" to two-person CPR, but were not significantly different from students who completed traditional training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)319-325
Number of pages7
JournalResuscitation
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Medical Students
Randomized Controlled Trials
Learning
Students
Delivery of Health Care
Video Recording
Professional Education
Aptitude
Norway
Ventilation
Shock
Thorax
Software

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
  • CPR education
  • CPR training
  • Healthcare professionals
  • Self-directed learning
  • Two-person CPR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A randomized controlled trial comparing traditional training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to self-directed CPR learning in first year medical students : The two-person CPR study. / Roppolo, Lynn P.; Heymann, Rahm; Pepe, Paul; Wagner, James; Commons, Bradford; Miller, Ronna; Allen, Emilie; Horne, Leyla; Wainscott, Michael P.; Idris, Ahamed H.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 82, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 319-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77067b3f50264667be74e23a2a6b5f60,
title = "A randomized controlled trial comparing traditional training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to self-directed CPR learning in first year medical students: The two-person CPR study",
abstract = "Study Aim: The primary purpose of this study was to compare two, shorter, self-directed methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education for healthcare professionals (HCP) to traditional training with a focus on the trainee's ability to perform two-person CPR. Methods: First-year medical students with either no prior CPR for HCP experience or prior training greater than 5 years were randomized to complete one of three courses: 1) HeartCode BLS System, 2) BLS Anytime, or 3) Traditional training. Only data from the adult CPR skills testing station was reviewed via video recording by certified CPR instructors and the Laerdal PC Skill Reporter software program (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Results: There were 180 first-year medical students who met inclusion criteria: 68 were HeartCode BLS System, 53 BLS Anytime group, and 59 traditional group Regarding two-person CPR, 57 (84{\%}) of Heartcode BLS students and 43 (81{\%}) of BLS Anytime students were able to initiate the switch compared to 39 (66{\%}) of traditional course students (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the quality of chest compressions or ventilations between the three groups. There was a trend for a much higher CPR skills testing pass rate for the traditional course students. However, failure to {"}clear to analyze or shock{"} while using the AED was the most common reason for failure in all groups. Conclusion: The self-directed learning groups not only had a high level of success in initiating the {"}switch{"} to two-person CPR, but were not significantly different from students who completed traditional training.",
keywords = "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), CPR education, CPR training, Healthcare professionals, Self-directed learning, Two-person CPR",
author = "Roppolo, {Lynn P.} and Rahm Heymann and Paul Pepe and James Wagner and Bradford Commons and Ronna Miller and Emilie Allen and Leyla Horne and Wainscott, {Michael P.} and Idris, {Ahamed H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "319--325",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized controlled trial comparing traditional training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to self-directed CPR learning in first year medical students

T2 - The two-person CPR study

AU - Roppolo, Lynn P.

AU - Heymann, Rahm

AU - Pepe, Paul

AU - Wagner, James

AU - Commons, Bradford

AU - Miller, Ronna

AU - Allen, Emilie

AU - Horne, Leyla

AU - Wainscott, Michael P.

AU - Idris, Ahamed H.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Study Aim: The primary purpose of this study was to compare two, shorter, self-directed methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education for healthcare professionals (HCP) to traditional training with a focus on the trainee's ability to perform two-person CPR. Methods: First-year medical students with either no prior CPR for HCP experience or prior training greater than 5 years were randomized to complete one of three courses: 1) HeartCode BLS System, 2) BLS Anytime, or 3) Traditional training. Only data from the adult CPR skills testing station was reviewed via video recording by certified CPR instructors and the Laerdal PC Skill Reporter software program (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Results: There were 180 first-year medical students who met inclusion criteria: 68 were HeartCode BLS System, 53 BLS Anytime group, and 59 traditional group Regarding two-person CPR, 57 (84%) of Heartcode BLS students and 43 (81%) of BLS Anytime students were able to initiate the switch compared to 39 (66%) of traditional course students (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the quality of chest compressions or ventilations between the three groups. There was a trend for a much higher CPR skills testing pass rate for the traditional course students. However, failure to "clear to analyze or shock" while using the AED was the most common reason for failure in all groups. Conclusion: The self-directed learning groups not only had a high level of success in initiating the "switch" to two-person CPR, but were not significantly different from students who completed traditional training.

AB - Study Aim: The primary purpose of this study was to compare two, shorter, self-directed methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education for healthcare professionals (HCP) to traditional training with a focus on the trainee's ability to perform two-person CPR. Methods: First-year medical students with either no prior CPR for HCP experience or prior training greater than 5 years were randomized to complete one of three courses: 1) HeartCode BLS System, 2) BLS Anytime, or 3) Traditional training. Only data from the adult CPR skills testing station was reviewed via video recording by certified CPR instructors and the Laerdal PC Skill Reporter software program (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Results: There were 180 first-year medical students who met inclusion criteria: 68 were HeartCode BLS System, 53 BLS Anytime group, and 59 traditional group Regarding two-person CPR, 57 (84%) of Heartcode BLS students and 43 (81%) of BLS Anytime students were able to initiate the switch compared to 39 (66%) of traditional course students (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the quality of chest compressions or ventilations between the three groups. There was a trend for a much higher CPR skills testing pass rate for the traditional course students. However, failure to "clear to analyze or shock" while using the AED was the most common reason for failure in all groups. Conclusion: The self-directed learning groups not only had a high level of success in initiating the "switch" to two-person CPR, but were not significantly different from students who completed traditional training.

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

KW - CPR education

KW - CPR training

KW - Healthcare professionals

KW - Self-directed learning

KW - Two-person CPR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751525794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751525794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.025

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 21146914

AN - SCOPUS:79751525794

VL - 82

SP - 319

EP - 325

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 3

ER -