A randomized trial of telemedicine for migraine management

Deborah I Friedman, Balaraman Rajan, Abraham Seidmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether synchronous video-based telemedicine visits with specialists are feasible and to evaluate clinical effectiveness, patient perceptions, and other benefits of telemedicine visits for follow-up migraine care in a tertiary headache center. Design: A one-year, randomized clinical trial. Results: Fifty patients were screened and 45 entered the study (43 women, two men). Out of 96 scheduled visits, 89 were successfully conducted using telemedicine. Eighteen patients (out of 22) in the telemedicine cohort and 12 patients (out of 23) in the in-office cohort completed the study. In this small study, clinical outcomes, namely improvement in MIDAS, number of headache days, and average severity at 12 months for participants in the telemedicine group, were not different from those in the in-office group. Convenience was rated higher and visit times were shorter in the telemedicine group. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with severe migraine-related disability, telemedicine was a feasible mode of treatment and an effective alternative to in-office visits for follow-up migraine care. Physician productivity could be higher with telemedicine, and patients may get better access because of its convenience. Trial Registration: This study is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01706003).

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCephalalgia
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
Migraine Disorders
Aftercare
Headache
Office Visits
Cohort Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Physicians

Keywords

  • all headache
  • all health services research
  • medical care
  • Migraine
  • telemedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A randomized trial of telemedicine for migraine management. / Friedman, Deborah I; Rajan, Balaraman; Seidmann, Abraham.

In: Cephalalgia, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e79fba6770d549e7844f183cea4b3649,
title = "A randomized trial of telemedicine for migraine management",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether synchronous video-based telemedicine visits with specialists are feasible and to evaluate clinical effectiveness, patient perceptions, and other benefits of telemedicine visits for follow-up migraine care in a tertiary headache center. Design: A one-year, randomized clinical trial. Results: Fifty patients were screened and 45 entered the study (43 women, two men). Out of 96 scheduled visits, 89 were successfully conducted using telemedicine. Eighteen patients (out of 22) in the telemedicine cohort and 12 patients (out of 23) in the in-office cohort completed the study. In this small study, clinical outcomes, namely improvement in MIDAS, number of headache days, and average severity at 12 months for participants in the telemedicine group, were not different from those in the in-office group. Convenience was rated higher and visit times were shorter in the telemedicine group. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with severe migraine-related disability, telemedicine was a feasible mode of treatment and an effective alternative to in-office visits for follow-up migraine care. Physician productivity could be higher with telemedicine, and patients may get better access because of its convenience. Trial Registration: This study is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01706003).",
keywords = "all headache, all health services research, medical care, Migraine, telemedicine",
author = "Friedman, {Deborah I} and Balaraman Rajan and Abraham Seidmann",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0333102419868250",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Cephalalgia",
issn = "0333-1024",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized trial of telemedicine for migraine management

AU - Friedman, Deborah I

AU - Rajan, Balaraman

AU - Seidmann, Abraham

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine whether synchronous video-based telemedicine visits with specialists are feasible and to evaluate clinical effectiveness, patient perceptions, and other benefits of telemedicine visits for follow-up migraine care in a tertiary headache center. Design: A one-year, randomized clinical trial. Results: Fifty patients were screened and 45 entered the study (43 women, two men). Out of 96 scheduled visits, 89 were successfully conducted using telemedicine. Eighteen patients (out of 22) in the telemedicine cohort and 12 patients (out of 23) in the in-office cohort completed the study. In this small study, clinical outcomes, namely improvement in MIDAS, number of headache days, and average severity at 12 months for participants in the telemedicine group, were not different from those in the in-office group. Convenience was rated higher and visit times were shorter in the telemedicine group. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with severe migraine-related disability, telemedicine was a feasible mode of treatment and an effective alternative to in-office visits for follow-up migraine care. Physician productivity could be higher with telemedicine, and patients may get better access because of its convenience. Trial Registration: This study is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01706003).

AB - Objective: To determine whether synchronous video-based telemedicine visits with specialists are feasible and to evaluate clinical effectiveness, patient perceptions, and other benefits of telemedicine visits for follow-up migraine care in a tertiary headache center. Design: A one-year, randomized clinical trial. Results: Fifty patients were screened and 45 entered the study (43 women, two men). Out of 96 scheduled visits, 89 were successfully conducted using telemedicine. Eighteen patients (out of 22) in the telemedicine cohort and 12 patients (out of 23) in the in-office cohort completed the study. In this small study, clinical outcomes, namely improvement in MIDAS, number of headache days, and average severity at 12 months for participants in the telemedicine group, were not different from those in the in-office group. Convenience was rated higher and visit times were shorter in the telemedicine group. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with severe migraine-related disability, telemedicine was a feasible mode of treatment and an effective alternative to in-office visits for follow-up migraine care. Physician productivity could be higher with telemedicine, and patients may get better access because of its convenience. Trial Registration: This study is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01706003).

KW - all headache

KW - all health services research

KW - medical care

KW - Migraine

KW - telemedicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071607876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071607876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0333102419868250

DO - 10.1177/0333102419868250

M3 - Article

C2 - 31450969

AN - SCOPUS:85071607876

JO - Cephalalgia

JF - Cephalalgia

SN - 0333-1024

ER -