A real-world study using claims data to evaluate possible failure of opioid treatment regimens among patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis in the US

Kavita Gandhi, Wenhui Wei, Ahong Huang, Li Wang, Ravi Iyer, Nathaniel P. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although opioids may be used in the management of pain in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), there is a dearth of real-world data characterizing opioid regimen failure in these patients. Objective: Using claims data, this study explored measures that may be potentially indica-tive of opioid treatment failure and the association of such potential failure with health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs. Patients and Methods: Using a national employer-sponsored insurance claims database covering the years 2011–2016, this retrospective longitudinal study identified adults with hip/ knee osteoarthritis who filled ≥1 opioid prescription (index event) and had continuous health plan enrollment 6 months pre-and ≥12 months post-index. Index opioid regimen intensity was defined in the 3-month post-index period by frequency, average daily dose, and duration of action. Possible index opioid regimen failure was defined as an increase in opioid regimen intensity, addition of a non-opioid pain medication, joint surgery, or opioid-abuse-related events. One-year follow-up HRU and costs were compared between those with possible treatment failure and those without. Results: Among 271,512 OA patients (61.5% knee; 11.1% hip; 27.4% both), 34.9% met the definition of possible index opioid regimen failure within a year: increased regimen intensity (16.1%), joint surgery (14.0%), addition of non-opioid pain medication (11.4%), and opioid-abuse-related events (1.9%). Rates of possible failure generally increased with higher index regimen intensity. Compared with those who did not fail, those who potentially failed their index treatment regimen had significantly higher HRU (P<0.001), and all-cause ($36,699 vs $15,114) and osteoarthritis-related costs ($17,298 vs $1,967) (both P<0.0001). Conclusion: Among OA patients treated with opioids, approximately one-third may fail their index opioid regimen within a year and incur significantly higher HRU and costs than those without. Further research is needed to validate these findings with clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-297
Number of pages13
JournalClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Costs
  • Health care resource use
  • Opioids
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Pain
  • Treatment failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A real-world study using claims data to evaluate possible failure of opioid treatment regimens among patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis in the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this