A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner

Randal B. Slates, Keyvan Farahani, Yiping Shao, Paul K. Marsden, Joanne Taylor, Paul E. Summers, Steve Williams, John Beech, Simon R. Cherry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have assessed the possibility of artefacts that can arise in attempting to perform simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a small prototype MR compatible PET scanner (McPET). In these experiments, we examine MR images for any major artefacts or loss in image quality due to inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, radiofrequency interference or susceptibility effects caused by operation of the PET system inside the MR scanner. In addition, possible artefacts in the PET images caused by the static and time-varying magnetic fields or radiofrequency interference from the MR system were investigated. Biological tissue and a T2-weighted spin echo sequence were used to examine susceptibility artefacts due to components of the McPET scanner (scintillator, optical fibres) situated in the MR field of view. A range of commonly used MR pulse sequences was studied while acquiring PET data to look for possible artefacts in either the PET or MR images. Other than a small loss in signal-to-noise using gradient echo sequences, there was no significant interaction between the two imaging systems. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging of simple phantoms was also carried out in different MR systems with field strengths ranging from 0.2 to 4.7 T. The results of these studies demonstrate that it is possible to acquire PET and MR images simultaneously, without any significant artefacts or loss in image quality, using our prototype MR compatible PET scanner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2015-2027
Number of pages13
JournalPhysics in Medicine and Biology
Volume44
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1999

Fingerprint

Positron-Emission Tomography
Artifacts
Magnetic Fields
Imaging Phantoms
Optical Fibers
Noise
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner. / Slates, Randal B.; Farahani, Keyvan; Shao, Yiping; Marsden, Paul K.; Taylor, Joanne; Summers, Paul E.; Williams, Steve; Beech, John; Cherry, Simon R.

In: Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 44, No. 8, 01.08.1999, p. 2015-2027.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Slates, RB, Farahani, K, Shao, Y, Marsden, PK, Taylor, J, Summers, PE, Williams, S, Beech, J & Cherry, SR 1999, 'A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner', Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2015-2027. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/8/312
Slates, Randal B. ; Farahani, Keyvan ; Shao, Yiping ; Marsden, Paul K. ; Taylor, Joanne ; Summers, Paul E. ; Williams, Steve ; Beech, John ; Cherry, Simon R. / A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner. In: Physics in Medicine and Biology. 1999 ; Vol. 44, No. 8. pp. 2015-2027.
@article{08e4e4963bb347f2a79dcff262103497,
title = "A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner",
abstract = "We have assessed the possibility of artefacts that can arise in attempting to perform simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a small prototype MR compatible PET scanner (McPET). In these experiments, we examine MR images for any major artefacts or loss in image quality due to inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, radiofrequency interference or susceptibility effects caused by operation of the PET system inside the MR scanner. In addition, possible artefacts in the PET images caused by the static and time-varying magnetic fields or radiofrequency interference from the MR system were investigated. Biological tissue and a T2-weighted spin echo sequence were used to examine susceptibility artefacts due to components of the McPET scanner (scintillator, optical fibres) situated in the MR field of view. A range of commonly used MR pulse sequences was studied while acquiring PET data to look for possible artefacts in either the PET or MR images. Other than a small loss in signal-to-noise using gradient echo sequences, there was no significant interaction between the two imaging systems. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging of simple phantoms was also carried out in different MR systems with field strengths ranging from 0.2 to 4.7 T. The results of these studies demonstrate that it is possible to acquire PET and MR images simultaneously, without any significant artefacts or loss in image quality, using our prototype MR compatible PET scanner.",
author = "Slates, {Randal B.} and Keyvan Farahani and Yiping Shao and Marsden, {Paul K.} and Joanne Taylor and Summers, {Paul E.} and Steve Williams and John Beech and Cherry, {Simon R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/0031-9155/44/8/312",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "2015--2027",
journal = "Physics in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0031-9155",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner

AU - Slates, Randal B.

AU - Farahani, Keyvan

AU - Shao, Yiping

AU - Marsden, Paul K.

AU - Taylor, Joanne

AU - Summers, Paul E.

AU - Williams, Steve

AU - Beech, John

AU - Cherry, Simon R.

PY - 1999/8/1

Y1 - 1999/8/1

N2 - We have assessed the possibility of artefacts that can arise in attempting to perform simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a small prototype MR compatible PET scanner (McPET). In these experiments, we examine MR images for any major artefacts or loss in image quality due to inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, radiofrequency interference or susceptibility effects caused by operation of the PET system inside the MR scanner. In addition, possible artefacts in the PET images caused by the static and time-varying magnetic fields or radiofrequency interference from the MR system were investigated. Biological tissue and a T2-weighted spin echo sequence were used to examine susceptibility artefacts due to components of the McPET scanner (scintillator, optical fibres) situated in the MR field of view. A range of commonly used MR pulse sequences was studied while acquiring PET data to look for possible artefacts in either the PET or MR images. Other than a small loss in signal-to-noise using gradient echo sequences, there was no significant interaction between the two imaging systems. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging of simple phantoms was also carried out in different MR systems with field strengths ranging from 0.2 to 4.7 T. The results of these studies demonstrate that it is possible to acquire PET and MR images simultaneously, without any significant artefacts or loss in image quality, using our prototype MR compatible PET scanner.

AB - We have assessed the possibility of artefacts that can arise in attempting to perform simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a small prototype MR compatible PET scanner (McPET). In these experiments, we examine MR images for any major artefacts or loss in image quality due to inhomogeneities in the magnetic field, radiofrequency interference or susceptibility effects caused by operation of the PET system inside the MR scanner. In addition, possible artefacts in the PET images caused by the static and time-varying magnetic fields or radiofrequency interference from the MR system were investigated. Biological tissue and a T2-weighted spin echo sequence were used to examine susceptibility artefacts due to components of the McPET scanner (scintillator, optical fibres) situated in the MR field of view. A range of commonly used MR pulse sequences was studied while acquiring PET data to look for possible artefacts in either the PET or MR images. Other than a small loss in signal-to-noise using gradient echo sequences, there was no significant interaction between the two imaging systems. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging of simple phantoms was also carried out in different MR systems with field strengths ranging from 0.2 to 4.7 T. The results of these studies demonstrate that it is possible to acquire PET and MR images simultaneously, without any significant artefacts or loss in image quality, using our prototype MR compatible PET scanner.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032765446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032765446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/44/8/312

DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/44/8/312

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 2015

EP - 2027

JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology

JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0031-9155

IS - 8

ER -