A survey of acute pain service structure and function in United States hospitals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the number of U.S. hospitals offering an acute pain service (APS) is increasing, the typical structure remains unknown. This survey was undertaken to describe the structure and function of the APS in U.S. hospitals only. We contacted 200 non-teaching and 101 teaching U.S. hospitals. The person in charge of postoperative pain management completed and returned the survey. Seventy-four percent of responding hospitals had an organized APS. An APS was significantly more formally organized in academic/teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching hospitals. Pain assessments included "pain at rest" (97%), "pain on activity" (63%), and reassessment after pain therapy intervention (88.8%). Responding hospitals utilized postoperative pain protocols significantly more commonly in teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching and VA hospitals. Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) was managed most commonly by surgeons (75%), while epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve block infusions were exclusively managed by anesthesiologists. For improved analgesia, 62% allowed RNs to adjust the IV-PCA settings within set parameters, 43% allowed RN adjustment of epidural infusion rates, and 21% allowed RN adjustment of peripheral nerve catheter local anesthetic infusion rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number934932
JournalPain Research and Treatment
Volume2011
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Pain Clinics
State Hospitals
Teaching Hospitals
Social Adjustment
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Postoperative Pain
Peripheral Nerves
Pain
Epidural Analgesia
Nerve Block
Pain Measurement
Pain Management
Local Anesthetics
Analgesia
Surveys and Questionnaires
Catheters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{9a92b59ba8474a40b0fa61cb9cab6b4d,
title = "A survey of acute pain service structure and function in United States hospitals",
abstract = "Although the number of U.S. hospitals offering an acute pain service (APS) is increasing, the typical structure remains unknown. This survey was undertaken to describe the structure and function of the APS in U.S. hospitals only. We contacted 200 non-teaching and 101 teaching U.S. hospitals. The person in charge of postoperative pain management completed and returned the survey. Seventy-four percent of responding hospitals had an organized APS. An APS was significantly more formally organized in academic/teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching hospitals. Pain assessments included {"}pain at rest{"} (97{\%}), {"}pain on activity{"} (63{\%}), and reassessment after pain therapy intervention (88.8{\%}). Responding hospitals utilized postoperative pain protocols significantly more commonly in teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching and VA hospitals. Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) was managed most commonly by surgeons (75{\%}), while epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve block infusions were exclusively managed by anesthesiologists. For improved analgesia, 62{\%} allowed RNs to adjust the IV-PCA settings within set parameters, 43{\%} allowed RN adjustment of epidural infusion rates, and 21{\%} allowed RN adjustment of peripheral nerve catheter local anesthetic infusion rates.",
author = "Dawood Nasir and Howard, {Jo E.} and Joshi, {Girish P.} and Hill, {Gary E.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1155/2011/934932",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2011",
journal = "Pain Research and Treatment",
issn = "2090-1542",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A survey of acute pain service structure and function in United States hospitals

AU - Nasir, Dawood

AU - Howard, Jo E.

AU - Joshi, Girish P.

AU - Hill, Gary E.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Although the number of U.S. hospitals offering an acute pain service (APS) is increasing, the typical structure remains unknown. This survey was undertaken to describe the structure and function of the APS in U.S. hospitals only. We contacted 200 non-teaching and 101 teaching U.S. hospitals. The person in charge of postoperative pain management completed and returned the survey. Seventy-four percent of responding hospitals had an organized APS. An APS was significantly more formally organized in academic/teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching hospitals. Pain assessments included "pain at rest" (97%), "pain on activity" (63%), and reassessment after pain therapy intervention (88.8%). Responding hospitals utilized postoperative pain protocols significantly more commonly in teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching and VA hospitals. Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) was managed most commonly by surgeons (75%), while epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve block infusions were exclusively managed by anesthesiologists. For improved analgesia, 62% allowed RNs to adjust the IV-PCA settings within set parameters, 43% allowed RN adjustment of epidural infusion rates, and 21% allowed RN adjustment of peripheral nerve catheter local anesthetic infusion rates.

AB - Although the number of U.S. hospitals offering an acute pain service (APS) is increasing, the typical structure remains unknown. This survey was undertaken to describe the structure and function of the APS in U.S. hospitals only. We contacted 200 non-teaching and 101 teaching U.S. hospitals. The person in charge of postoperative pain management completed and returned the survey. Seventy-four percent of responding hospitals had an organized APS. An APS was significantly more formally organized in academic/teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching hospitals. Pain assessments included "pain at rest" (97%), "pain on activity" (63%), and reassessment after pain therapy intervention (88.8%). Responding hospitals utilized postoperative pain protocols significantly more commonly in teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching and VA hospitals. Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) was managed most commonly by surgeons (75%), while epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve block infusions were exclusively managed by anesthesiologists. For improved analgesia, 62% allowed RNs to adjust the IV-PCA settings within set parameters, 43% allowed RN adjustment of epidural infusion rates, and 21% allowed RN adjustment of peripheral nerve catheter local anesthetic infusion rates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866254399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866254399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2011/934932

DO - 10.1155/2011/934932

M3 - Article

VL - 2011

JO - Pain Research and Treatment

JF - Pain Research and Treatment

SN - 2090-1542

M1 - 934932

ER -