A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastrostomy insertion techniques in children

Laura Baker, Alana L. Beres, Robert Baird

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Gastrostomy tubes are inserted via multiple techniques to provide a route for enteral feeding in the pediatric population. This review compares the rate of major complications and resource utilization associated with the various insertion techniques. Methods Major electronic databases were queried for comparative studies of two or more insertion techniques, including open, laparoscopic, percutaneous endoscopic, or fluoroscopic guided. Major complications were defined as reoperation within 1 year or death. Screening of eligible studies, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were conducted independently by two reviewers. Forest and funnel plots were generated for outcomes using Revman 5.1, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Twenty-two studies with a total of 5438 patients met inclusion criteria. No differences in major complications were noted in studies comparing open versus laparoscopic approaches or open versus PEG. Studies comparing laparoscopic gastrostomy and PEG revealed a significantly increased risk in major complications with PEG (n = 10 studies, OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.51, p < 0.0001). The number needed to treat to reduce one major complication by abandoning PEG is 45. Conclusions PEG is associated with an increased risk of major complications when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Advantages in operative time appear outweighed by the increased safety profile of laparoscopic gastrostomy insertion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)718-725
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Meta-Analysis
Numbers Needed To Treat
Enteral Nutrition
Operative Time
Reoperation
Databases
Pediatrics
Safety
Population

Keywords

  • Complication
  • Gastrostomy
  • Pediatric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastrostomy insertion techniques in children. / Baker, Laura; Beres, Alana L.; Baird, Robert.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 50, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 718-725.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baker, Laura ; Beres, Alana L. ; Baird, Robert. / A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastrostomy insertion techniques in children. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 50, No. 5. pp. 718-725.
@article{d438e4c9faef42adb45ba476d210361f,
title = "A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastrostomy insertion techniques in children",
abstract = "Background Gastrostomy tubes are inserted via multiple techniques to provide a route for enteral feeding in the pediatric population. This review compares the rate of major complications and resource utilization associated with the various insertion techniques. Methods Major electronic databases were queried for comparative studies of two or more insertion techniques, including open, laparoscopic, percutaneous endoscopic, or fluoroscopic guided. Major complications were defined as reoperation within 1 year or death. Screening of eligible studies, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were conducted independently by two reviewers. Forest and funnel plots were generated for outcomes using Revman 5.1, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Twenty-two studies with a total of 5438 patients met inclusion criteria. No differences in major complications were noted in studies comparing open versus laparoscopic approaches or open versus PEG. Studies comparing laparoscopic gastrostomy and PEG revealed a significantly increased risk in major complications with PEG (n = 10 studies, OR 0.29, 95{\%} CI: 0.17-0.51, p < 0.0001). The number needed to treat to reduce one major complication by abandoning PEG is 45. Conclusions PEG is associated with an increased risk of major complications when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Advantages in operative time appear outweighed by the increased safety profile of laparoscopic gastrostomy insertion.",
keywords = "Complication, Gastrostomy, Pediatric",
author = "Laura Baker and Beres, {Alana L.} and Robert Baird",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "718--725",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of gastrostomy insertion techniques in children

AU - Baker, Laura

AU - Beres, Alana L.

AU - Baird, Robert

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Background Gastrostomy tubes are inserted via multiple techniques to provide a route for enteral feeding in the pediatric population. This review compares the rate of major complications and resource utilization associated with the various insertion techniques. Methods Major electronic databases were queried for comparative studies of two or more insertion techniques, including open, laparoscopic, percutaneous endoscopic, or fluoroscopic guided. Major complications were defined as reoperation within 1 year or death. Screening of eligible studies, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were conducted independently by two reviewers. Forest and funnel plots were generated for outcomes using Revman 5.1, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Twenty-two studies with a total of 5438 patients met inclusion criteria. No differences in major complications were noted in studies comparing open versus laparoscopic approaches or open versus PEG. Studies comparing laparoscopic gastrostomy and PEG revealed a significantly increased risk in major complications with PEG (n = 10 studies, OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.51, p < 0.0001). The number needed to treat to reduce one major complication by abandoning PEG is 45. Conclusions PEG is associated with an increased risk of major complications when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Advantages in operative time appear outweighed by the increased safety profile of laparoscopic gastrostomy insertion.

AB - Background Gastrostomy tubes are inserted via multiple techniques to provide a route for enteral feeding in the pediatric population. This review compares the rate of major complications and resource utilization associated with the various insertion techniques. Methods Major electronic databases were queried for comparative studies of two or more insertion techniques, including open, laparoscopic, percutaneous endoscopic, or fluoroscopic guided. Major complications were defined as reoperation within 1 year or death. Screening of eligible studies, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were conducted independently by two reviewers. Forest and funnel plots were generated for outcomes using Revman 5.1, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Twenty-two studies with a total of 5438 patients met inclusion criteria. No differences in major complications were noted in studies comparing open versus laparoscopic approaches or open versus PEG. Studies comparing laparoscopic gastrostomy and PEG revealed a significantly increased risk in major complications with PEG (n = 10 studies, OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.51, p < 0.0001). The number needed to treat to reduce one major complication by abandoning PEG is 45. Conclusions PEG is associated with an increased risk of major complications when compared to the laparoscopic approach. Advantages in operative time appear outweighed by the increased safety profile of laparoscopic gastrostomy insertion.

KW - Complication

KW - Gastrostomy

KW - Pediatric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928699637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928699637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 25783383

AN - SCOPUS:84928699637

VL - 50

SP - 718

EP - 725

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 5

ER -