Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Selection, Periprocedural Anticoagulation, Techniques, and Preventive Measures after Ablation

Mark S. Link, Michel Haïssaguerre, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered by cardiologists and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for AF include age, male sex, genetic predisposition, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, heart failure, and possibly excessive exercise. The management of AF involves decisions about rate versus rhythm control. Asymptomatic patients are generally managed with rate control and anticoagulation. Symptomatic patients will desire rhythm control. Rhythm control options are either antiarrhythmic agents or ablation, with each having its own risks and benefits. Ablation of AF has evolved from a rare and complex procedure to a common electrophysiological technique. Selection of patients to undergo ablation is an important aspect of AF care. Patients with the highest success rates of ablation are those with normal structural hearts and paroxysmal AF, although those with congestive heart failure have the greatest potential benefit of the procedure. Although pulmonary vein isolation of any means/energy source is the approach generally agreed on for those with paroxysmal AF, optimal techniques for the ablation of nonparoxysmal AF are not yet clear. Anticoagulation reduces thromboembolic complications; the newer anticoagulants have eased management for both the patient and the cardiologist. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, and possibly excessive exercise) after ablation reduces the odds of recurrent AF and is an important element of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-352
Number of pages14
JournalCirculation
Volume134
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 26 2016

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Patient Selection
Air Pollution
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Hyperthyroidism
Lung Diseases
Diabetes Mellitus
Heart Failure
Obesity
Smoking
Alcohols
Ablation Techniques
Exercise
Hypertension
Pulmonary Veins
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Anticoagulants
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • ablation techniques
  • anti-arrhythmia agents
  • anticoagulants
  • atrial fibrillation
  • pulsed radiofrequency treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation : Patient Selection, Periprocedural Anticoagulation, Techniques, and Preventive Measures after Ablation. / Link, Mark S.; Haïssaguerre, Michel; Natale, Andrea.

In: Circulation, Vol. 134, No. 4, 26.07.2016, p. 339-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b905c88368d54c8c85648387161bc109,
title = "Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Selection, Periprocedural Anticoagulation, Techniques, and Preventive Measures after Ablation",
abstract = "Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered by cardiologists and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for AF include age, male sex, genetic predisposition, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, heart failure, and possibly excessive exercise. The management of AF involves decisions about rate versus rhythm control. Asymptomatic patients are generally managed with rate control and anticoagulation. Symptomatic patients will desire rhythm control. Rhythm control options are either antiarrhythmic agents or ablation, with each having its own risks and benefits. Ablation of AF has evolved from a rare and complex procedure to a common electrophysiological technique. Selection of patients to undergo ablation is an important aspect of AF care. Patients with the highest success rates of ablation are those with normal structural hearts and paroxysmal AF, although those with congestive heart failure have the greatest potential benefit of the procedure. Although pulmonary vein isolation of any means/energy source is the approach generally agreed on for those with paroxysmal AF, optimal techniques for the ablation of nonparoxysmal AF are not yet clear. Anticoagulation reduces thromboembolic complications; the newer anticoagulants have eased management for both the patient and the cardiologist. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, and possibly excessive exercise) after ablation reduces the odds of recurrent AF and is an important element of care.",
keywords = "ablation techniques, anti-arrhythmia agents, anticoagulants, atrial fibrillation, pulsed radiofrequency treatment",
author = "Link, {Mark S.} and Michel Ha{\"i}ssaguerre and Andrea Natale",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021727",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "339--352",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

T2 - Patient Selection, Periprocedural Anticoagulation, Techniques, and Preventive Measures after Ablation

AU - Link, Mark S.

AU - Haïssaguerre, Michel

AU - Natale, Andrea

PY - 2016/7/26

Y1 - 2016/7/26

N2 - Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered by cardiologists and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for AF include age, male sex, genetic predisposition, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, heart failure, and possibly excessive exercise. The management of AF involves decisions about rate versus rhythm control. Asymptomatic patients are generally managed with rate control and anticoagulation. Symptomatic patients will desire rhythm control. Rhythm control options are either antiarrhythmic agents or ablation, with each having its own risks and benefits. Ablation of AF has evolved from a rare and complex procedure to a common electrophysiological technique. Selection of patients to undergo ablation is an important aspect of AF care. Patients with the highest success rates of ablation are those with normal structural hearts and paroxysmal AF, although those with congestive heart failure have the greatest potential benefit of the procedure. Although pulmonary vein isolation of any means/energy source is the approach generally agreed on for those with paroxysmal AF, optimal techniques for the ablation of nonparoxysmal AF are not yet clear. Anticoagulation reduces thromboembolic complications; the newer anticoagulants have eased management for both the patient and the cardiologist. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, and possibly excessive exercise) after ablation reduces the odds of recurrent AF and is an important element of care.

AB - Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered by cardiologists and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for AF include age, male sex, genetic predisposition, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, heart failure, and possibly excessive exercise. The management of AF involves decisions about rate versus rhythm control. Asymptomatic patients are generally managed with rate control and anticoagulation. Symptomatic patients will desire rhythm control. Rhythm control options are either antiarrhythmic agents or ablation, with each having its own risks and benefits. Ablation of AF has evolved from a rare and complex procedure to a common electrophysiological technique. Selection of patients to undergo ablation is an important aspect of AF care. Patients with the highest success rates of ablation are those with normal structural hearts and paroxysmal AF, although those with congestive heart failure have the greatest potential benefit of the procedure. Although pulmonary vein isolation of any means/energy source is the approach generally agreed on for those with paroxysmal AF, optimal techniques for the ablation of nonparoxysmal AF are not yet clear. Anticoagulation reduces thromboembolic complications; the newer anticoagulants have eased management for both the patient and the cardiologist. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity, excessive alcohol, smoking, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary disease, air pollution, and possibly excessive exercise) after ablation reduces the odds of recurrent AF and is an important element of care.

KW - ablation techniques

KW - anti-arrhythmia agents

KW - anticoagulants

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - pulsed radiofrequency treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980000109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980000109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021727

DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021727

M3 - Article

C2 - 27462054

AN - SCOPUS:84980000109

VL - 134

SP - 339

EP - 352

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 4

ER -