TY - JOUR
T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Chest Pain—High Probability of Coronary Artery Disease
AU - Expert Panel on Cardiac Imaging:
AU - Akers, Scott R.
AU - Panchal, Vandan
AU - Ho, Vincent B.
AU - Beache, Garth M.
AU - Brown, Richard K.J.
AU - Ghoshhajra, Brian B.
AU - Greenberg, S. Bruce
AU - Hsu, Joe Y.
AU - Kicska, Gregory A.
AU - Min, James K.
AU - Stillman, Arthur E.
AU - Stojanovska, Jadranka
AU - Abbara, Suhny
AU - Jacobs, Jill E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Radiology
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - In patients with chronic chest pain in the setting of high probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), imaging has major and diverse roles. First, imaging is valuable in determining and documenting the presence, extent, and severity of myocardial ischemia, hibernation, scarring, and/or the presence, site, and severity of obstructive coronary lesions. Second, imaging findings are important in determining the course of management of patients with suspected chronic myocardial ischemia and better defining those patients best suited for medical therapy, angioplasty/stenting, or surgery. Third, imaging is also necessary to determine the long-term prognosis and likely benefit from various therapeutic options by evaluating ventricular function, diastolic relaxation, and end-systolic volume. Imaging studies are also required to demonstrate other abnormalities, such as congenital/acquired coronary anomalies and severe left ventricular hypertrophy, that can produce angina in the absence of symptomatic coronary obstructive disease due to atherosclerosis. Clinical risk assessment is necessary to determine the pretest probability of CAD. Multiple methods are available to categorize patients as low, medium, or high risk for developing CAD. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
AB - In patients with chronic chest pain in the setting of high probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), imaging has major and diverse roles. First, imaging is valuable in determining and documenting the presence, extent, and severity of myocardial ischemia, hibernation, scarring, and/or the presence, site, and severity of obstructive coronary lesions. Second, imaging findings are important in determining the course of management of patients with suspected chronic myocardial ischemia and better defining those patients best suited for medical therapy, angioplasty/stenting, or surgery. Third, imaging is also necessary to determine the long-term prognosis and likely benefit from various therapeutic options by evaluating ventricular function, diastolic relaxation, and end-systolic volume. Imaging studies are also required to demonstrate other abnormalities, such as congenital/acquired coronary anomalies and severe left ventricular hypertrophy, that can produce angina in the absence of symptomatic coronary obstructive disease due to atherosclerosis. Clinical risk assessment is necessary to determine the pretest probability of CAD. Multiple methods are available to categorize patients as low, medium, or high risk for developing CAD. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
KW - AUC
KW - Appropriate Use Criteria
KW - Appropriateness Criteria
KW - chronic chest pain
KW - coronary artery
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - high probability of coronary artery disease
KW - high-risk cardiac disease
KW - myocardial ischemia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018415382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018415382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.034
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.034
M3 - Article
C2 - 28473096
AN - SCOPUS:85018415382
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 14
SP - S71-S80
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 5
ER -