ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Expert Panel on Vascular Imaging:

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical palpation of a pulsating abdominal mass alerts the clinician to the presence of a possible abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Imaging studies are important in diagnosing and categorizing the extent of the aneurysm and may aid in treatment planning. The consensus of the literature supports the use of ultrasound as the initial screening test in patients with suspected AAA. Population-based ultrasound screening studies have been recommended and have proved effective for male patients > 65 years of age. For diagnosis and pre-intervention evaluation, either multidetector CT or CT angiography is the optimal choice for detailed characterization of the aneurysm. MR angiography may be substituted if CT cannot be performed (for example, because the patient is allergic to iodinated contrast material). Invasive angiography has little role in the diagnosis of AAA and PET and CT remain experimental in patients with suspected aneurysms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S258-S265
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Aneurysm
Angiography
Guidelines
Palpation
Expert Testimony
Contrast Media
Therapeutics
Population

Keywords

  • AAA
  • abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Appropriate Use Criteria
  • Appropriateness Criteria
  • AUC
  • CTA
  • MRA
  • ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. / Expert Panel on Vascular Imaging:.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 14, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. S258-S265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f898e89e5fc045d29bfcc6dbcbf57c08,
title = "ACR Appropriateness Criteria{\circledR} Pulsatile Abdominal Mass Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm",
abstract = "Clinical palpation of a pulsating abdominal mass alerts the clinician to the presence of a possible abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Imaging studies are important in diagnosing and categorizing the extent of the aneurysm and may aid in treatment planning. The consensus of the literature supports the use of ultrasound as the initial screening test in patients with suspected AAA. Population-based ultrasound screening studies have been recommended and have proved effective for male patients > 65 years of age. For diagnosis and pre-intervention evaluation, either multidetector CT or CT angiography is the optimal choice for detailed characterization of the aneurysm. MR angiography may be substituted if CT cannot be performed (for example, because the patient is allergic to iodinated contrast material). Invasive angiography has little role in the diagnosis of AAA and PET and CT remain experimental in patients with suspected aneurysms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.",
keywords = "AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm, Appropriate Use Criteria, Appropriateness Criteria, AUC, CTA, MRA, ultrasound",
author = "{Expert Panel on Vascular Imaging:} and Reis, {Stephen P.} and Majdalany, {Bill S.} and AbuRahma, {Ali F.} and Collins, {Jeremy D.} and Francois, {Christopher J.} and Suvranu Ganguli and Gornik, {Heather L.} and Kendi, {A. Tuba} and Khaja, {Minhajuddin S.} and Norton, {Patrick T.} and Sutphin, {Patrick D.} and Rybicki, {Frank J.} and Kalva, {Sanjeeva P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "S258--S265",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

AU - Expert Panel on Vascular Imaging:

AU - Reis, Stephen P.

AU - Majdalany, Bill S.

AU - AbuRahma, Ali F.

AU - Collins, Jeremy D.

AU - Francois, Christopher J.

AU - Ganguli, Suvranu

AU - Gornik, Heather L.

AU - Kendi, A. Tuba

AU - Khaja, Minhajuddin S.

AU - Norton, Patrick T.

AU - Sutphin, Patrick D.

AU - Rybicki, Frank J.

AU - Kalva, Sanjeeva P.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Clinical palpation of a pulsating abdominal mass alerts the clinician to the presence of a possible abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Imaging studies are important in diagnosing and categorizing the extent of the aneurysm and may aid in treatment planning. The consensus of the literature supports the use of ultrasound as the initial screening test in patients with suspected AAA. Population-based ultrasound screening studies have been recommended and have proved effective for male patients > 65 years of age. For diagnosis and pre-intervention evaluation, either multidetector CT or CT angiography is the optimal choice for detailed characterization of the aneurysm. MR angiography may be substituted if CT cannot be performed (for example, because the patient is allergic to iodinated contrast material). Invasive angiography has little role in the diagnosis of AAA and PET and CT remain experimental in patients with suspected aneurysms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

AB - Clinical palpation of a pulsating abdominal mass alerts the clinician to the presence of a possible abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Imaging studies are important in diagnosing and categorizing the extent of the aneurysm and may aid in treatment planning. The consensus of the literature supports the use of ultrasound as the initial screening test in patients with suspected AAA. Population-based ultrasound screening studies have been recommended and have proved effective for male patients > 65 years of age. For diagnosis and pre-intervention evaluation, either multidetector CT or CT angiography is the optimal choice for detailed characterization of the aneurysm. MR angiography may be substituted if CT cannot be performed (for example, because the patient is allergic to iodinated contrast material). Invasive angiography has little role in the diagnosis of AAA and PET and CT remain experimental in patients with suspected aneurysms. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

KW - AAA

KW - abdominal aortic aneurysm

KW - Appropriate Use Criteria

KW - Appropriateness Criteria

KW - AUC

KW - CTA

KW - MRA

KW - ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018377176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018377176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.027

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 28473082

AN - SCOPUS:85018377176

VL - 14

SP - S258-S265

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 5

ER -