Acute Care Surgery: Defining the Economic Burden of Emergency General Surgery

Mayur Narayan, Ronald Tesoriero, Brandon R. Bruns, Elena N. Klyushnenkova, Hegang Chen, Jose J. Diaz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Trauma centers (TCs) have been shown to provide lifesaving, but more expensive, care when compared with non-TCs (NTC). Limited data exist about the economic impact of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients on health care systems. We hypothesized that the economic burden would be higher for EGS patients managed at TCs vs NTCs. Methods The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was queried from 2009 to 2013. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma EGS ICD-9 codes were used to define the top 10 EGS diagnoses. Demographic characteristics, TC designation, severity of illness, and hospital charge data were collected. Differences in total charges between TCs and NTCs were analyzed by Wilcoxon test using SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute). Results A total of 435,623 patients were included. Median age was 61 years (interquartile range 47 to 76 years) and 55.9% were female. Median length of stay was 4 days; 90.3% were admitted via emergency department; and overall mortality was 5.1%. Overall median charges were $11,081 for TC vs $8,264 for NTC (p < 0.0001). Minor, moderate, major, and extreme severities of illness all had higher charges at TC vs NTC with no ICU admissions, respectfully ($5,908 vs $5,243; $7,051 vs $6,003; $10,501 vs $8,777; and $23, 997 vs $18,381; p < 0.001). Care at TCs was nearly twice as expensive if patients were admitted to the ICU, even when stratifying by severity of illness. Conclusions Emergency general surgery patients treated at TCs incurred increased costs compared with NTCs, independent of patient severity. These costs nearly doubled for those admitted to the ICU. As acute care surgery grows as a specialty, additional investigation is required to better understand the reasons for this cost differential.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-699
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume222
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Emergencies
Economics
International Classification of Diseases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospital Charges
Health Care Costs
Health Services
Hospital Emergency Service
Length of Stay
Software
Demography
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Acute Care Surgery : Defining the Economic Burden of Emergency General Surgery. / Narayan, Mayur; Tesoriero, Ronald; Bruns, Brandon R.; Klyushnenkova, Elena N.; Chen, Hegang; Diaz, Jose J.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 222, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 691-699.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Narayan, Mayur ; Tesoriero, Ronald ; Bruns, Brandon R. ; Klyushnenkova, Elena N. ; Chen, Hegang ; Diaz, Jose J. / Acute Care Surgery : Defining the Economic Burden of Emergency General Surgery. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2016 ; Vol. 222, No. 4. pp. 691-699.
@article{3682b706cbaf4e80872d90a0e1fd3843,
title = "Acute Care Surgery: Defining the Economic Burden of Emergency General Surgery",
abstract = "Background Trauma centers (TCs) have been shown to provide lifesaving, but more expensive, care when compared with non-TCs (NTC). Limited data exist about the economic impact of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients on health care systems. We hypothesized that the economic burden would be higher for EGS patients managed at TCs vs NTCs. Methods The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was queried from 2009 to 2013. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma EGS ICD-9 codes were used to define the top 10 EGS diagnoses. Demographic characteristics, TC designation, severity of illness, and hospital charge data were collected. Differences in total charges between TCs and NTCs were analyzed by Wilcoxon test using SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute). Results A total of 435,623 patients were included. Median age was 61 years (interquartile range 47 to 76 years) and 55.9{\%} were female. Median length of stay was 4 days; 90.3{\%} were admitted via emergency department; and overall mortality was 5.1{\%}. Overall median charges were $11,081 for TC vs $8,264 for NTC (p < 0.0001). Minor, moderate, major, and extreme severities of illness all had higher charges at TC vs NTC with no ICU admissions, respectfully ($5,908 vs $5,243; $7,051 vs $6,003; $10,501 vs $8,777; and $23, 997 vs $18,381; p < 0.001). Care at TCs was nearly twice as expensive if patients were admitted to the ICU, even when stratifying by severity of illness. Conclusions Emergency general surgery patients treated at TCs incurred increased costs compared with NTCs, independent of patient severity. These costs nearly doubled for those admitted to the ICU. As acute care surgery grows as a specialty, additional investigation is required to better understand the reasons for this cost differential.",
author = "Mayur Narayan and Ronald Tesoriero and Bruns, {Brandon R.} and Klyushnenkova, {Elena N.} and Hegang Chen and Diaz, {Jose J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "222",
pages = "691--699",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute Care Surgery

T2 - Defining the Economic Burden of Emergency General Surgery

AU - Narayan, Mayur

AU - Tesoriero, Ronald

AU - Bruns, Brandon R.

AU - Klyushnenkova, Elena N.

AU - Chen, Hegang

AU - Diaz, Jose J.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background Trauma centers (TCs) have been shown to provide lifesaving, but more expensive, care when compared with non-TCs (NTC). Limited data exist about the economic impact of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients on health care systems. We hypothesized that the economic burden would be higher for EGS patients managed at TCs vs NTCs. Methods The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was queried from 2009 to 2013. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma EGS ICD-9 codes were used to define the top 10 EGS diagnoses. Demographic characteristics, TC designation, severity of illness, and hospital charge data were collected. Differences in total charges between TCs and NTCs were analyzed by Wilcoxon test using SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute). Results A total of 435,623 patients were included. Median age was 61 years (interquartile range 47 to 76 years) and 55.9% were female. Median length of stay was 4 days; 90.3% were admitted via emergency department; and overall mortality was 5.1%. Overall median charges were $11,081 for TC vs $8,264 for NTC (p < 0.0001). Minor, moderate, major, and extreme severities of illness all had higher charges at TC vs NTC with no ICU admissions, respectfully ($5,908 vs $5,243; $7,051 vs $6,003; $10,501 vs $8,777; and $23, 997 vs $18,381; p < 0.001). Care at TCs was nearly twice as expensive if patients were admitted to the ICU, even when stratifying by severity of illness. Conclusions Emergency general surgery patients treated at TCs incurred increased costs compared with NTCs, independent of patient severity. These costs nearly doubled for those admitted to the ICU. As acute care surgery grows as a specialty, additional investigation is required to better understand the reasons for this cost differential.

AB - Background Trauma centers (TCs) have been shown to provide lifesaving, but more expensive, care when compared with non-TCs (NTC). Limited data exist about the economic impact of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients on health care systems. We hypothesized that the economic burden would be higher for EGS patients managed at TCs vs NTCs. Methods The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was queried from 2009 to 2013. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma EGS ICD-9 codes were used to define the top 10 EGS diagnoses. Demographic characteristics, TC designation, severity of illness, and hospital charge data were collected. Differences in total charges between TCs and NTCs were analyzed by Wilcoxon test using SAS 9.3 software (SAS Institute). Results A total of 435,623 patients were included. Median age was 61 years (interquartile range 47 to 76 years) and 55.9% were female. Median length of stay was 4 days; 90.3% were admitted via emergency department; and overall mortality was 5.1%. Overall median charges were $11,081 for TC vs $8,264 for NTC (p < 0.0001). Minor, moderate, major, and extreme severities of illness all had higher charges at TC vs NTC with no ICU admissions, respectfully ($5,908 vs $5,243; $7,051 vs $6,003; $10,501 vs $8,777; and $23, 997 vs $18,381; p < 0.001). Care at TCs was nearly twice as expensive if patients were admitted to the ICU, even when stratifying by severity of illness. Conclusions Emergency general surgery patients treated at TCs incurred increased costs compared with NTCs, independent of patient severity. These costs nearly doubled for those admitted to the ICU. As acute care surgery grows as a specialty, additional investigation is required to better understand the reasons for this cost differential.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962376471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962376471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.054

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.054

M3 - Article

C2 - 27016997

AN - SCOPUS:84962376471

VL - 222

SP - 691

EP - 699

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 4

ER -