Advanced laparoscopic skills: Understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance

Dmitry Nepomnayshy, Jim Whitledge, Shimae Fitzgibbons, Biba Nijjar, Aimee K Gardner, Adnan Alseidi, Richard Birkett, Shanley Deal, Rafia Rodney Duvra, Nicholas Anton, Dimitrios Stefanidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The advanced laparoscopic skills (ALS) curriculum was created to address the need for improved laparoscopic training for senior surgical trainees. It focuses on the domain of laparoscopic suturing and consists of 6 tasks with established proficiency benchmarks. Tasks are performed using a standard laparoscopic box trainer. This study examines whether practicing on the ALS curriculum could translate to improved clinical suturing. Methods: Surgery residents from four institutions participated in the study. Performance of the 6 ALS tasks and performance of a porcine gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and Nissen fundoplication were assessed before and after training. Video-recorded performance was de-identified and scored by three experts using both time and a previously published assessment instrument. Paired t-tests examined performance differences before and after the curriculum. Pearson correlations examined the relationship between performance on the porcine and ALS tasks. Results: Twelve residents (PGY1-8) from 4 institutions completed the study. Average practice time on ALS tasks was 6.25 weeks (range 1–14 weeks) and 254 min (range 140–600min). Combined ALS task time decreased from 2748s ± 603s to 1756s ± 281s (p < 0.001). Each of the 6 task times significantly improved (p < 0.05). Total errors decreased from 5.8 ± 3.2 to 3.7 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05). Average GJ times decreased from 1043s ± 698s to 643s ± 183s (p = 0.055). Average Nissen times decreased from 990s ± 531s to 685s ± 265s (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Dedicated practice on the six ALS tasks led to decreased suturing time and fewer errors when completing both GJ and Nissen suturing in a porcine model. Further studies will be undertaken to determine the optimal application of the ALS task set in advanced laparoscopic training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Curriculum
Swine
Benchmarking
Fundoplication
Task Performance and Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Advanced laparoscopic skills : Understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance. / Nepomnayshy, Dmitry; Whitledge, Jim; Fitzgibbons, Shimae; Nijjar, Biba; Gardner, Aimee K; Alseidi, Adnan; Birkett, Richard; Deal, Shanley; Duvra, Rafia Rodney; Anton, Nicholas; Stefanidis, Dimitrios.

In: American Journal of Surgery, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nepomnayshy, D, Whitledge, J, Fitzgibbons, S, Nijjar, B, Gardner, AK, Alseidi, A, Birkett, R, Deal, S, Duvra, RR, Anton, N & Stefanidis, D 2019, 'Advanced laparoscopic skills: Understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance', American Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.024
Nepomnayshy, Dmitry ; Whitledge, Jim ; Fitzgibbons, Shimae ; Nijjar, Biba ; Gardner, Aimee K ; Alseidi, Adnan ; Birkett, Richard ; Deal, Shanley ; Duvra, Rafia Rodney ; Anton, Nicholas ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios. / Advanced laparoscopic skills : Understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2019.
@article{ff04be98c792464ba4b27f7e333c26b6,
title = "Advanced laparoscopic skills: Understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance",
abstract = "Introduction: The advanced laparoscopic skills (ALS) curriculum was created to address the need for improved laparoscopic training for senior surgical trainees. It focuses on the domain of laparoscopic suturing and consists of 6 tasks with established proficiency benchmarks. Tasks are performed using a standard laparoscopic box trainer. This study examines whether practicing on the ALS curriculum could translate to improved clinical suturing. Methods: Surgery residents from four institutions participated in the study. Performance of the 6 ALS tasks and performance of a porcine gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and Nissen fundoplication were assessed before and after training. Video-recorded performance was de-identified and scored by three experts using both time and a previously published assessment instrument. Paired t-tests examined performance differences before and after the curriculum. Pearson correlations examined the relationship between performance on the porcine and ALS tasks. Results: Twelve residents (PGY1-8) from 4 institutions completed the study. Average practice time on ALS tasks was 6.25 weeks (range 1–14 weeks) and 254 min (range 140–600min). Combined ALS task time decreased from 2748s ± 603s to 1756s ± 281s (p < 0.001). Each of the 6 task times significantly improved (p < 0.05). Total errors decreased from 5.8 ± 3.2 to 3.7 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05). Average GJ times decreased from 1043s ± 698s to 643s ± 183s (p = 0.055). Average Nissen times decreased from 990s ± 531s to 685s ± 265s (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Dedicated practice on the six ALS tasks led to decreased suturing time and fewer errors when completing both GJ and Nissen suturing in a porcine model. Further studies will be undertaken to determine the optimal application of the ALS task set in advanced laparoscopic training.",
author = "Dmitry Nepomnayshy and Jim Whitledge and Shimae Fitzgibbons and Biba Nijjar and Gardner, {Aimee K} and Adnan Alseidi and Richard Birkett and Shanley Deal and Duvra, {Rafia Rodney} and Nicholas Anton and Dimitrios Stefanidis",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.024",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advanced laparoscopic skills

T2 - Understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance

AU - Nepomnayshy, Dmitry

AU - Whitledge, Jim

AU - Fitzgibbons, Shimae

AU - Nijjar, Biba

AU - Gardner, Aimee K

AU - Alseidi, Adnan

AU - Birkett, Richard

AU - Deal, Shanley

AU - Duvra, Rafia Rodney

AU - Anton, Nicholas

AU - Stefanidis, Dimitrios

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: The advanced laparoscopic skills (ALS) curriculum was created to address the need for improved laparoscopic training for senior surgical trainees. It focuses on the domain of laparoscopic suturing and consists of 6 tasks with established proficiency benchmarks. Tasks are performed using a standard laparoscopic box trainer. This study examines whether practicing on the ALS curriculum could translate to improved clinical suturing. Methods: Surgery residents from four institutions participated in the study. Performance of the 6 ALS tasks and performance of a porcine gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and Nissen fundoplication were assessed before and after training. Video-recorded performance was de-identified and scored by three experts using both time and a previously published assessment instrument. Paired t-tests examined performance differences before and after the curriculum. Pearson correlations examined the relationship between performance on the porcine and ALS tasks. Results: Twelve residents (PGY1-8) from 4 institutions completed the study. Average practice time on ALS tasks was 6.25 weeks (range 1–14 weeks) and 254 min (range 140–600min). Combined ALS task time decreased from 2748s ± 603s to 1756s ± 281s (p < 0.001). Each of the 6 task times significantly improved (p < 0.05). Total errors decreased from 5.8 ± 3.2 to 3.7 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05). Average GJ times decreased from 1043s ± 698s to 643s ± 183s (p = 0.055). Average Nissen times decreased from 990s ± 531s to 685s ± 265s (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Dedicated practice on the six ALS tasks led to decreased suturing time and fewer errors when completing both GJ and Nissen suturing in a porcine model. Further studies will be undertaken to determine the optimal application of the ALS task set in advanced laparoscopic training.

AB - Introduction: The advanced laparoscopic skills (ALS) curriculum was created to address the need for improved laparoscopic training for senior surgical trainees. It focuses on the domain of laparoscopic suturing and consists of 6 tasks with established proficiency benchmarks. Tasks are performed using a standard laparoscopic box trainer. This study examines whether practicing on the ALS curriculum could translate to improved clinical suturing. Methods: Surgery residents from four institutions participated in the study. Performance of the 6 ALS tasks and performance of a porcine gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and Nissen fundoplication were assessed before and after training. Video-recorded performance was de-identified and scored by three experts using both time and a previously published assessment instrument. Paired t-tests examined performance differences before and after the curriculum. Pearson correlations examined the relationship between performance on the porcine and ALS tasks. Results: Twelve residents (PGY1-8) from 4 institutions completed the study. Average practice time on ALS tasks was 6.25 weeks (range 1–14 weeks) and 254 min (range 140–600min). Combined ALS task time decreased from 2748s ± 603s to 1756s ± 281s (p < 0.001). Each of the 6 task times significantly improved (p < 0.05). Total errors decreased from 5.8 ± 3.2 to 3.7 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05). Average GJ times decreased from 1043s ± 698s to 643s ± 183s (p = 0.055). Average Nissen times decreased from 990s ± 531s to 685s ± 265s (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Dedicated practice on the six ALS tasks led to decreased suturing time and fewer errors when completing both GJ and Nissen suturing in a porcine model. Further studies will be undertaken to determine the optimal application of the ALS task set in advanced laparoscopic training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061297658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061297658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.024

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 30765163

AN - SCOPUS:85061297658

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

ER -