Advanced trauma operative management course: Participant survey

Lenworth Jacobs, Karyl Burns, Stephen Luk, Stephanie Hull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course uses standardized porcine simulation to teach the repair of penetrating trauma. It is offered in 26 sites in the United States, Canada, Africa, the Middle East, and Japan. The purpose of the present study was to query ATOM participants regarding their perceptions of the value and influence of the ATOM course on knowledge, confidence, and skill to repair penetrating injuries. Methods: An anonymous, voluntary survey was posted on the Internet at surveymonkey.com. E-mail notification was sent to all 1,001 ATOM participants through May 2008. Items requested agreement/disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale and space for comments. Agreement indicated positive perceptions of ATOM. Results: A total of 962 surgeons received the request to complete the survey; 444 ATOM participants from 36 states and 17 countries participated, for a response rate of 46%. Range of agreement with all of the items was 75.4-99.0%. Results include the following: 78.9% (95% CI, 74.7-82.6%) can identify injuries more quickly; 80.7% (95% CI, 76.6-84.3%) have a more organized operative approach; 81.1% (95% CI, 77.0-84.6%) can control bleeding more quickly; 86.1% (95% CI, 82.4-89.2%) can control injuries more effectively; 86.4% (95% CI, 82.7-89.4%) are more competent trauma surgeons; 87.0% are more confident (95% CI, 83.4-89.9%), and 89.2% are more knowledgeable (95% CI, 85.8-91.8%) about repairing penetrating injuries; 99% (95% CI, 97.4-99.7%) said ATOM is worthwhile. Overall, 87.4% of the comments were positive. Conclusions: Participants worldwide perceive that ATOM is worthwhile and helps surgeons improve knowledge, confidence, and skill in repairing penetrating injuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-168
Number of pages5
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Surveys and Questionnaires
Middle East
Internet
Canada
Japan
Swine
Hemorrhage
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Advanced trauma operative management course : Participant survey. / Jacobs, Lenworth; Burns, Karyl; Luk, Stephen; Hull, Stephanie.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 164-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobs, Lenworth ; Burns, Karyl ; Luk, Stephen ; Hull, Stephanie. / Advanced trauma operative management course : Participant survey. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 164-168.
@article{d7fce5489c574ae2bc644ca050297a85,
title = "Advanced trauma operative management course: Participant survey",
abstract = "Background: The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course uses standardized porcine simulation to teach the repair of penetrating trauma. It is offered in 26 sites in the United States, Canada, Africa, the Middle East, and Japan. The purpose of the present study was to query ATOM participants regarding their perceptions of the value and influence of the ATOM course on knowledge, confidence, and skill to repair penetrating injuries. Methods: An anonymous, voluntary survey was posted on the Internet at surveymonkey.com. E-mail notification was sent to all 1,001 ATOM participants through May 2008. Items requested agreement/disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale and space for comments. Agreement indicated positive perceptions of ATOM. Results: A total of 962 surgeons received the request to complete the survey; 444 ATOM participants from 36 states and 17 countries participated, for a response rate of 46{\%}. Range of agreement with all of the items was 75.4-99.0{\%}. Results include the following: 78.9{\%} (95{\%} CI, 74.7-82.6{\%}) can identify injuries more quickly; 80.7{\%} (95{\%} CI, 76.6-84.3{\%}) have a more organized operative approach; 81.1{\%} (95{\%} CI, 77.0-84.6{\%}) can control bleeding more quickly; 86.1{\%} (95{\%} CI, 82.4-89.2{\%}) can control injuries more effectively; 86.4{\%} (95{\%} CI, 82.7-89.4{\%}) are more competent trauma surgeons; 87.0{\%} are more confident (95{\%} CI, 83.4-89.9{\%}), and 89.2{\%} are more knowledgeable (95{\%} CI, 85.8-91.8{\%}) about repairing penetrating injuries; 99{\%} (95{\%} CI, 97.4-99.7{\%}) said ATOM is worthwhile. Overall, 87.4{\%} of the comments were positive. Conclusions: Participants worldwide perceive that ATOM is worthwhile and helps surgeons improve knowledge, confidence, and skill in repairing penetrating injuries.",
author = "Lenworth Jacobs and Karyl Burns and Stephen Luk and Stephanie Hull",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-009-0276-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "164--168",
journal = "Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advanced trauma operative management course

T2 - Participant survey

AU - Jacobs, Lenworth

AU - Burns, Karyl

AU - Luk, Stephen

AU - Hull, Stephanie

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Background: The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course uses standardized porcine simulation to teach the repair of penetrating trauma. It is offered in 26 sites in the United States, Canada, Africa, the Middle East, and Japan. The purpose of the present study was to query ATOM participants regarding their perceptions of the value and influence of the ATOM course on knowledge, confidence, and skill to repair penetrating injuries. Methods: An anonymous, voluntary survey was posted on the Internet at surveymonkey.com. E-mail notification was sent to all 1,001 ATOM participants through May 2008. Items requested agreement/disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale and space for comments. Agreement indicated positive perceptions of ATOM. Results: A total of 962 surgeons received the request to complete the survey; 444 ATOM participants from 36 states and 17 countries participated, for a response rate of 46%. Range of agreement with all of the items was 75.4-99.0%. Results include the following: 78.9% (95% CI, 74.7-82.6%) can identify injuries more quickly; 80.7% (95% CI, 76.6-84.3%) have a more organized operative approach; 81.1% (95% CI, 77.0-84.6%) can control bleeding more quickly; 86.1% (95% CI, 82.4-89.2%) can control injuries more effectively; 86.4% (95% CI, 82.7-89.4%) are more competent trauma surgeons; 87.0% are more confident (95% CI, 83.4-89.9%), and 89.2% are more knowledgeable (95% CI, 85.8-91.8%) about repairing penetrating injuries; 99% (95% CI, 97.4-99.7%) said ATOM is worthwhile. Overall, 87.4% of the comments were positive. Conclusions: Participants worldwide perceive that ATOM is worthwhile and helps surgeons improve knowledge, confidence, and skill in repairing penetrating injuries.

AB - Background: The Advanced Trauma Operative Management (ATOM) course uses standardized porcine simulation to teach the repair of penetrating trauma. It is offered in 26 sites in the United States, Canada, Africa, the Middle East, and Japan. The purpose of the present study was to query ATOM participants regarding their perceptions of the value and influence of the ATOM course on knowledge, confidence, and skill to repair penetrating injuries. Methods: An anonymous, voluntary survey was posted on the Internet at surveymonkey.com. E-mail notification was sent to all 1,001 ATOM participants through May 2008. Items requested agreement/disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale and space for comments. Agreement indicated positive perceptions of ATOM. Results: A total of 962 surgeons received the request to complete the survey; 444 ATOM participants from 36 states and 17 countries participated, for a response rate of 46%. Range of agreement with all of the items was 75.4-99.0%. Results include the following: 78.9% (95% CI, 74.7-82.6%) can identify injuries more quickly; 80.7% (95% CI, 76.6-84.3%) have a more organized operative approach; 81.1% (95% CI, 77.0-84.6%) can control bleeding more quickly; 86.1% (95% CI, 82.4-89.2%) can control injuries more effectively; 86.4% (95% CI, 82.7-89.4%) are more competent trauma surgeons; 87.0% are more confident (95% CI, 83.4-89.9%), and 89.2% are more knowledgeable (95% CI, 85.8-91.8%) about repairing penetrating injuries; 99% (95% CI, 97.4-99.7%) said ATOM is worthwhile. Overall, 87.4% of the comments were positive. Conclusions: Participants worldwide perceive that ATOM is worthwhile and helps surgeons improve knowledge, confidence, and skill in repairing penetrating injuries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73649117430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73649117430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-009-0276-z

DO - 10.1007/s00268-009-0276-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 19911221

AN - SCOPUS:73649117430

VL - 34

SP - 164

EP - 168

JO - Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference

JF - Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 1

ER -