Advances in robotic surgery for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: history, present, and future

Arthi Satyanarayan, Craig A Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The introduction of robotic surgical technology into urological reconstruction, particularly pediatrics, has introduced new horizons for reducing the morbidity and enhancing the efficacy of surgical repair of congenital conditions in children. In reviewing the evolution of pediatric urological applications of robotic surgery, we wanted to address the different levels of reported utilization of pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation as two of the most common procedures. Methods: Review of the published literature sought to explore the described variation in clinical application of these two common procedures, and the evolution of the practice over time. Results: Reported outcomes suggest that variations in patient selection, the learning curve and in reporting of outcomes all contribute to the wide variation in utilization of pediatric robotic pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation. Conclusions: These technologies are demonstrating their potential as well as the challenges of use in children and there is a steady evolution of capability. Practitioners should be aware of both the possibilities as well as the risks of such new technology in the care of our patients. This requires thorough and open reporting of outcomes, the willingness to introduce change and integrate new findings into practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
Robotics
Replantation
History
Pediatrics
Technology
Learning Curve
Patient Selection
Patient Care
Morbidity
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Pediatric
  • Pyeloplasty
  • Robotic surgery
  • Ureteral reimplantation
  • Urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{27efe310d0b0435e96cfa7f0d638c877,
title = "Advances in robotic surgery for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: history, present, and future",
abstract = "Purpose: The introduction of robotic surgical technology into urological reconstruction, particularly pediatrics, has introduced new horizons for reducing the morbidity and enhancing the efficacy of surgical repair of congenital conditions in children. In reviewing the evolution of pediatric urological applications of robotic surgery, we wanted to address the different levels of reported utilization of pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation as two of the most common procedures. Methods: Review of the published literature sought to explore the described variation in clinical application of these two common procedures, and the evolution of the practice over time. Results: Reported outcomes suggest that variations in patient selection, the learning curve and in reporting of outcomes all contribute to the wide variation in utilization of pediatric robotic pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation. Conclusions: These technologies are demonstrating their potential as well as the challenges of use in children and there is a steady evolution of capability. Practitioners should be aware of both the possibilities as well as the risks of such new technology in the care of our patients. This requires thorough and open reporting of outcomes, the willingness to introduce change and integrate new findings into practice.",
keywords = "Pediatric, Pyeloplasty, Robotic surgery, Ureteral reimplantation, Urology",
author = "Arthi Satyanarayan and Peters, {Craig A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00345-019-02753-3",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "World Journal of Urology",
issn = "0724-4983",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advances in robotic surgery for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux

T2 - history, present, and future

AU - Satyanarayan, Arthi

AU - Peters, Craig A

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The introduction of robotic surgical technology into urological reconstruction, particularly pediatrics, has introduced new horizons for reducing the morbidity and enhancing the efficacy of surgical repair of congenital conditions in children. In reviewing the evolution of pediatric urological applications of robotic surgery, we wanted to address the different levels of reported utilization of pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation as two of the most common procedures. Methods: Review of the published literature sought to explore the described variation in clinical application of these two common procedures, and the evolution of the practice over time. Results: Reported outcomes suggest that variations in patient selection, the learning curve and in reporting of outcomes all contribute to the wide variation in utilization of pediatric robotic pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation. Conclusions: These technologies are demonstrating their potential as well as the challenges of use in children and there is a steady evolution of capability. Practitioners should be aware of both the possibilities as well as the risks of such new technology in the care of our patients. This requires thorough and open reporting of outcomes, the willingness to introduce change and integrate new findings into practice.

AB - Purpose: The introduction of robotic surgical technology into urological reconstruction, particularly pediatrics, has introduced new horizons for reducing the morbidity and enhancing the efficacy of surgical repair of congenital conditions in children. In reviewing the evolution of pediatric urological applications of robotic surgery, we wanted to address the different levels of reported utilization of pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation as two of the most common procedures. Methods: Review of the published literature sought to explore the described variation in clinical application of these two common procedures, and the evolution of the practice over time. Results: Reported outcomes suggest that variations in patient selection, the learning curve and in reporting of outcomes all contribute to the wide variation in utilization of pediatric robotic pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation. Conclusions: These technologies are demonstrating their potential as well as the challenges of use in children and there is a steady evolution of capability. Practitioners should be aware of both the possibilities as well as the risks of such new technology in the care of our patients. This requires thorough and open reporting of outcomes, the willingness to introduce change and integrate new findings into practice.

KW - Pediatric

KW - Pyeloplasty

KW - Robotic surgery

KW - Ureteral reimplantation

KW - Urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064243784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064243784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00345-019-02753-3

DO - 10.1007/s00345-019-02753-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 30953140

AN - SCOPUS:85064243784

JO - World Journal of Urology

JF - World Journal of Urology

SN - 0724-4983

ER -