Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation

An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement

William O. Roberts, Herbert Löllgen, Gordon O. Matheson, Anne B. Royalty, Willem H. Meeuwisse, Benjamin Levine, Mark R. Hutchinson, Nailah Coleman, Holly J. Benjamin, Antonio Spataro, André Debruyne, Norbert Bachl, Fabio Pigozzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is widely accepted, its usage and content are not standardized. Implementation is affected by cost, access, level of participation, participant age/sex, and local/regional/national mandate. Preparticipation physical evaluation screening costs are generally borne by the athlete, family, or club. Screening involves generally agreed-upon questions based on expert opinion and tested over decades of use. No large-scale prospective controlled tracking programs have examined PPE outcomes. While the panel did not reach consensus on electrocardiogram (ECG) screening as a routine part of PPE, all agreed that a history and physical exam focusing on cardiac risk is essential, and an ECG should be used where risk is increased. The many areas of consensus should help the American College of Sports Medicine and Fédération Internationale du Médicine du Sport in developing a universally accepted PPE. An electronic PPE, using human-centered design, would be comprehensive, would provide a database given that PPE is mandatory in many locations, would simplify PPE administration, would allow remote access to clinical data, and would provide the much-needed data for prospective studies in this area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-447
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Volume24
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Consensus
Joints
Electrocardiography
Costs and Cost Analysis
Expert Testimony
Athletes
Sports
History
Databases
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Electronic PPE
  • PPE costs
  • PPE research
  • Screening strategies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Roberts, W. O., Löllgen, H., Matheson, G. O., Royalty, A. B., Meeuwisse, W. H., Levine, B., ... Pigozzi, F. (2014). Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation: An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 24(6), 442-447.

Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation : An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement. / Roberts, William O.; Löllgen, Herbert; Matheson, Gordon O.; Royalty, Anne B.; Meeuwisse, Willem H.; Levine, Benjamin; Hutchinson, Mark R.; Coleman, Nailah; Benjamin, Holly J.; Spataro, Antonio; Debruyne, André; Bachl, Norbert; Pigozzi, Fabio.

In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2014, p. 442-447.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roberts, WO, Löllgen, H, Matheson, GO, Royalty, AB, Meeuwisse, WH, Levine, B, Hutchinson, MR, Coleman, N, Benjamin, HJ, Spataro, A, Debruyne, A, Bachl, N & Pigozzi, F 2014, 'Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation: An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement', Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 442-447.
Roberts WO, Löllgen H, Matheson GO, Royalty AB, Meeuwisse WH, Levine B et al. Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation: An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2014;24(6):442-447.
Roberts, William O. ; Löllgen, Herbert ; Matheson, Gordon O. ; Royalty, Anne B. ; Meeuwisse, Willem H. ; Levine, Benjamin ; Hutchinson, Mark R. ; Coleman, Nailah ; Benjamin, Holly J. ; Spataro, Antonio ; Debruyne, André ; Bachl, Norbert ; Pigozzi, Fabio. / Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation : An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement. In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 442-447.
@article{43b7b3fa8dfe4724bb585bf9b0018089,
title = "Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation: An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement",
abstract = "While the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is widely accepted, its usage and content are not standardized. Implementation is affected by cost, access, level of participation, participant age/sex, and local/regional/national mandate. Preparticipation physical evaluation screening costs are generally borne by the athlete, family, or club. Screening involves generally agreed-upon questions based on expert opinion and tested over decades of use. No large-scale prospective controlled tracking programs have examined PPE outcomes. While the panel did not reach consensus on electrocardiogram (ECG) screening as a routine part of PPE, all agreed that a history and physical exam focusing on cardiac risk is essential, and an ECG should be used where risk is increased. The many areas of consensus should help the American College of Sports Medicine and F{\'e}d{\'e}ration Internationale du M{\'e}dicine du Sport in developing a universally accepted PPE. An electronic PPE, using human-centered design, would be comprehensive, would provide a database given that PPE is mandatory in many locations, would simplify PPE administration, would allow remote access to clinical data, and would provide the much-needed data for prospective studies in this area.",
keywords = "Electronic PPE, PPE costs, PPE research, Screening strategies",
author = "Roberts, {William O.} and Herbert L{\"o}llgen and Matheson, {Gordon O.} and Royalty, {Anne B.} and Meeuwisse, {Willem H.} and Benjamin Levine and Hutchinson, {Mark R.} and Nailah Coleman and Benjamin, {Holly J.} and Antonio Spataro and Andr{\'e} Debruyne and Norbert Bachl and Fabio Pigozzi",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "442--447",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine",
issn = "1050-642X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advancing the preparticipation physical evaluation

T2 - An ACSM and FIMS joint consensus statement

AU - Roberts, William O.

AU - Löllgen, Herbert

AU - Matheson, Gordon O.

AU - Royalty, Anne B.

AU - Meeuwisse, Willem H.

AU - Levine, Benjamin

AU - Hutchinson, Mark R.

AU - Coleman, Nailah

AU - Benjamin, Holly J.

AU - Spataro, Antonio

AU - Debruyne, André

AU - Bachl, Norbert

AU - Pigozzi, Fabio

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - While the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is widely accepted, its usage and content are not standardized. Implementation is affected by cost, access, level of participation, participant age/sex, and local/regional/national mandate. Preparticipation physical evaluation screening costs are generally borne by the athlete, family, or club. Screening involves generally agreed-upon questions based on expert opinion and tested over decades of use. No large-scale prospective controlled tracking programs have examined PPE outcomes. While the panel did not reach consensus on electrocardiogram (ECG) screening as a routine part of PPE, all agreed that a history and physical exam focusing on cardiac risk is essential, and an ECG should be used where risk is increased. The many areas of consensus should help the American College of Sports Medicine and Fédération Internationale du Médicine du Sport in developing a universally accepted PPE. An electronic PPE, using human-centered design, would be comprehensive, would provide a database given that PPE is mandatory in many locations, would simplify PPE administration, would allow remote access to clinical data, and would provide the much-needed data for prospective studies in this area.

AB - While the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is widely accepted, its usage and content are not standardized. Implementation is affected by cost, access, level of participation, participant age/sex, and local/regional/national mandate. Preparticipation physical evaluation screening costs are generally borne by the athlete, family, or club. Screening involves generally agreed-upon questions based on expert opinion and tested over decades of use. No large-scale prospective controlled tracking programs have examined PPE outcomes. While the panel did not reach consensus on electrocardiogram (ECG) screening as a routine part of PPE, all agreed that a history and physical exam focusing on cardiac risk is essential, and an ECG should be used where risk is increased. The many areas of consensus should help the American College of Sports Medicine and Fédération Internationale du Médicine du Sport in developing a universally accepted PPE. An electronic PPE, using human-centered design, would be comprehensive, would provide a database given that PPE is mandatory in many locations, would simplify PPE administration, would allow remote access to clinical data, and would provide the much-needed data for prospective studies in this area.

KW - Electronic PPE

KW - PPE costs

KW - PPE research

KW - Screening strategies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927670492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927670492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 442

EP - 447

JO - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

JF - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

SN - 1050-642X

IS - 6

ER -