Alar contour grafts in rhinoplasty: A safe and reproducible way to refine alar contour aesthetics

Jacob G. Unger, Jason Roostaeian, Kevin H. Small, Ronnie A. Pezeshk, Michael R. Lee, Ryan Harris, Rod J. Rohrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Alar rim deformities such as retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry are common problems in rhinoplasty patients. Although alar rim deformities may be improved through rhinoplasty, this area is prone to late changes because of scarring of the soft triangles and a paucity of native structural support. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of alar contour grafts on primary rhinoplasty. Methods: Fifty consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients with preoperative and postoperative photographs who received alar contour grafts were evaluated for alar aesthetics; 50 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients without such grafts served as controls. Differences among alar retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry from anterior, lateral, and basal views were evaluated. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years and was graded on a four-point scale. Results: The average difference between the two groups' aggregate preoperative scores was 0.21 (p = 0.24). The average preoperative and postoperative scores in the nongraft group were significant for worsening retraction, notching, and collapse but insignificant for asymmetry. The preoperative and postoperative scores for the graft group were insignificant for retraction but improved significantly for notching, collapse, and asymmetry. Postoperatively, the aggregate average of the scores in the nongroup was 0.32 points worse (p <0.01), whereas the graft group had a 0.33-point improvement (p <0.01). Conclusions: Alar contour grafts have a clear and important impact on cosmetic results of primary rhinoplasty. Use of alar contour grafts has been shown to improve aesthetics, whereas there is a worsening of the measured parameters postoperatively without use of these grafts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages10
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume137
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Rhinoplasty
Esthetics
Transplants
daminozide
Cosmetics
Cicatrix

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Alar contour grafts in rhinoplasty : A safe and reproducible way to refine alar contour aesthetics. / Unger, Jacob G.; Roostaeian, Jason; Small, Kevin H.; Pezeshk, Ronnie A.; Lee, Michael R.; Harris, Ryan; Rohrich, Rod J.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 137, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 52-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Unger, Jacob G. ; Roostaeian, Jason ; Small, Kevin H. ; Pezeshk, Ronnie A. ; Lee, Michael R. ; Harris, Ryan ; Rohrich, Rod J. / Alar contour grafts in rhinoplasty : A safe and reproducible way to refine alar contour aesthetics. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 137, No. 1. pp. 52-61.
@article{50fb5e71b8d8445283097415e6a64459,
title = "Alar contour grafts in rhinoplasty: A safe and reproducible way to refine alar contour aesthetics",
abstract = "Background: Alar rim deformities such as retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry are common problems in rhinoplasty patients. Although alar rim deformities may be improved through rhinoplasty, this area is prone to late changes because of scarring of the soft triangles and a paucity of native structural support. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of alar contour grafts on primary rhinoplasty. Methods: Fifty consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients with preoperative and postoperative photographs who received alar contour grafts were evaluated for alar aesthetics; 50 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients without such grafts served as controls. Differences among alar retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry from anterior, lateral, and basal views were evaluated. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years and was graded on a four-point scale. Results: The average difference between the two groups' aggregate preoperative scores was 0.21 (p = 0.24). The average preoperative and postoperative scores in the nongraft group were significant for worsening retraction, notching, and collapse but insignificant for asymmetry. The preoperative and postoperative scores for the graft group were insignificant for retraction but improved significantly for notching, collapse, and asymmetry. Postoperatively, the aggregate average of the scores in the nongroup was 0.32 points worse (p <0.01), whereas the graft group had a 0.33-point improvement (p <0.01). Conclusions: Alar contour grafts have a clear and important impact on cosmetic results of primary rhinoplasty. Use of alar contour grafts has been shown to improve aesthetics, whereas there is a worsening of the measured parameters postoperatively without use of these grafts.",
author = "Unger, {Jacob G.} and Jason Roostaeian and Small, {Kevin H.} and Pezeshk, {Ronnie A.} and Lee, {Michael R.} and Ryan Harris and Rohrich, {Rod J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000001942",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "52--61",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alar contour grafts in rhinoplasty

T2 - A safe and reproducible way to refine alar contour aesthetics

AU - Unger, Jacob G.

AU - Roostaeian, Jason

AU - Small, Kevin H.

AU - Pezeshk, Ronnie A.

AU - Lee, Michael R.

AU - Harris, Ryan

AU - Rohrich, Rod J.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Background: Alar rim deformities such as retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry are common problems in rhinoplasty patients. Although alar rim deformities may be improved through rhinoplasty, this area is prone to late changes because of scarring of the soft triangles and a paucity of native structural support. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of alar contour grafts on primary rhinoplasty. Methods: Fifty consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients with preoperative and postoperative photographs who received alar contour grafts were evaluated for alar aesthetics; 50 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients without such grafts served as controls. Differences among alar retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry from anterior, lateral, and basal views were evaluated. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years and was graded on a four-point scale. Results: The average difference between the two groups' aggregate preoperative scores was 0.21 (p = 0.24). The average preoperative and postoperative scores in the nongraft group were significant for worsening retraction, notching, and collapse but insignificant for asymmetry. The preoperative and postoperative scores for the graft group were insignificant for retraction but improved significantly for notching, collapse, and asymmetry. Postoperatively, the aggregate average of the scores in the nongroup was 0.32 points worse (p <0.01), whereas the graft group had a 0.33-point improvement (p <0.01). Conclusions: Alar contour grafts have a clear and important impact on cosmetic results of primary rhinoplasty. Use of alar contour grafts has been shown to improve aesthetics, whereas there is a worsening of the measured parameters postoperatively without use of these grafts.

AB - Background: Alar rim deformities such as retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry are common problems in rhinoplasty patients. Although alar rim deformities may be improved through rhinoplasty, this area is prone to late changes because of scarring of the soft triangles and a paucity of native structural support. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of alar contour grafts on primary rhinoplasty. Methods: Fifty consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients with preoperative and postoperative photographs who received alar contour grafts were evaluated for alar aesthetics; 50 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients without such grafts served as controls. Differences among alar retraction, notching, collapse, and asymmetry from anterior, lateral, and basal views were evaluated. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years and was graded on a four-point scale. Results: The average difference between the two groups' aggregate preoperative scores was 0.21 (p = 0.24). The average preoperative and postoperative scores in the nongraft group were significant for worsening retraction, notching, and collapse but insignificant for asymmetry. The preoperative and postoperative scores for the graft group were insignificant for retraction but improved significantly for notching, collapse, and asymmetry. Postoperatively, the aggregate average of the scores in the nongroup was 0.32 points worse (p <0.01), whereas the graft group had a 0.33-point improvement (p <0.01). Conclusions: Alar contour grafts have a clear and important impact on cosmetic results of primary rhinoplasty. Use of alar contour grafts has been shown to improve aesthetics, whereas there is a worsening of the measured parameters postoperatively without use of these grafts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952666955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952666955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001942

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001942

M3 - Article

C2 - 26710007

AN - SCOPUS:84952666955

VL - 137

SP - 52

EP - 61

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 1

ER -