TY - JOUR
T1 - Altering prosthetic foot stiffness influences foot and muscle function during below-knee amputee walking
T2 - A modeling and simulation analysis
AU - Fey, Nicholas P.
AU - Klute, Glenn K.
AU - Neptune, Richard R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this study was provided by the National Science Foundation , Grant 0346514 and Department of Veterans Affairs , Grant 1 I01 RX000311 .
PY - 2013/2/22
Y1 - 2013/2/22
N2 - Most prosthetic feet are designed to improve amputee gait by storing and releasing elastic energy during stance. However, how prosthetic foot stiffness influences muscle and foot function is unclear. Identifying these relationships would provide quantitative rationale for prosthetic foot prescription that may lead to improved amputee gait. The purpose of this study was to identify the influence of altered prosthetic foot stiffness on muscle and foot function using forward dynamics simulations of amputee walking. Three 2D muscle-actuated forward dynamics simulations of unilateral below-knee amputee walking with a range of foot stiffness levels were generated, and muscle and prosthetic foot contributions to body support and propulsion and residual leg swing were quantified. As stiffness decreased, the prosthetic keel provided increased support and braking (negative propulsion) during the first half of stance while the heel contribution to support decreased. During the second half of stance, the keel provided decreased propulsion and increased support. In addition, the keel absorbed less power from the leg, contributing more to swing initiation. Thus, several muscle compensations were necessary. During the first half of stance, the residual leg hamstrings provided decreased support and increased propulsion. During the second half of stance, the intact leg vasti provided increased support and the residual leg rectus femoris transferred increased energy from the leg to the trunk for propulsion. These results highlight the influence prosthetic foot stiffness has on muscle and foot function throughout the gait cycle and may aid in prescribing feet of appropriate stiffness.
AB - Most prosthetic feet are designed to improve amputee gait by storing and releasing elastic energy during stance. However, how prosthetic foot stiffness influences muscle and foot function is unclear. Identifying these relationships would provide quantitative rationale for prosthetic foot prescription that may lead to improved amputee gait. The purpose of this study was to identify the influence of altered prosthetic foot stiffness on muscle and foot function using forward dynamics simulations of amputee walking. Three 2D muscle-actuated forward dynamics simulations of unilateral below-knee amputee walking with a range of foot stiffness levels were generated, and muscle and prosthetic foot contributions to body support and propulsion and residual leg swing were quantified. As stiffness decreased, the prosthetic keel provided increased support and braking (negative propulsion) during the first half of stance while the heel contribution to support decreased. During the second half of stance, the keel provided decreased propulsion and increased support. In addition, the keel absorbed less power from the leg, contributing more to swing initiation. Thus, several muscle compensations were necessary. During the first half of stance, the residual leg hamstrings provided decreased support and increased propulsion. During the second half of stance, the intact leg vasti provided increased support and the residual leg rectus femoris transferred increased energy from the leg to the trunk for propulsion. These results highlight the influence prosthetic foot stiffness has on muscle and foot function throughout the gait cycle and may aid in prescribing feet of appropriate stiffness.
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Elastic energy storage and return
KW - Forward dynamics simulation
KW - Gait
KW - Transtibial amputee
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879880361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879880361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.051
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.11.051
M3 - Article
C2 - 23312827
AN - SCOPUS:84879880361
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 46
SP - 637
EP - 644
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 4
ER -