An empirical evaluation of the retrospective pretest: Are there advantages to looking back?

Paul A. Nakonezny, Joseph Lee Rodgers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article builds on research regarding response shift effects and retrospective self-report ratings. Results suggest moderate evidence of a response shift bias in the conventional pretest-posttest treatment design in the treatment group. The use of explicitly worded anchors on response scales, as well as the measurement of knowledge ratings (a cognitive construct) in an evaluation methodology setting, helped to mitigate the magnitude of a response shift bias. The retrospective pretest-posttest design provides a measure of change that is more in accord with the objective measure of change than is the conventional pretest-posttest treatment design with the objective measure of change, for the setting and experimental conditions used in the present study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)240-250
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Keywords

  • Measuring change
  • Quasi-experimentation
  • Response shift bias
  • Retrospective pretest
  • Retrospective pretest-posttest design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical evaluation of the retrospective pretest: Are there advantages to looking back?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this