An empirically derived short form of the Boston Naming Test

Amy E. Lansing, Robert J. Ivnik, C. Munro Cullum, Christopher Randolph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is one of the most commonly used tests of confrontation naming. The length of the test, particularly when administered to impaired patients, has prompted the derivation of several abbreviated forms. Short forms of the BNT have typically been equated in terms of difficulty, but not empirically derived for discriminating between normals and anomic patients. Furthermore, most reports to date have been limited in sample size and generalizability. The present study examined BNT data from a total of 1,044 subjects, including 719 normals and 325 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Scores were calculated for the entire 60-item version as well as for eight previously reported short forms. The scores were examined for the effects of age, education, and gender, as well as for the ability of each form to discriminate between AD patients and normals. There was a significant effect of age, education, and gender on all previously published forms, and the short forms varied in their ability to discriminate between patients and controls. A stepwise discriminant analysis was conducted to empirically derive a new, gender-neutral short form with discriminability comparable to the full 60-item test. Norms from this sample on the empirically derived short form are reported. Copyright (C) 1999 National Academy of Neuropsychology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)481-487
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1999

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Alzheimer Disease
Education
Discriminant Analysis
Sample Size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

An empirically derived short form of the Boston Naming Test. / Lansing, Amy E.; Ivnik, Robert J.; Cullum, C. Munro; Randolph, Christopher.

In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 14, No. 6, 08.1999, p. 481-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lansing, Amy E. ; Ivnik, Robert J. ; Cullum, C. Munro ; Randolph, Christopher. / An empirically derived short form of the Boston Naming Test. In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1999 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 481-487.
@article{ec0c0839cdcb4dfab0418e5cb7933bb4,
title = "An empirically derived short form of the Boston Naming Test",
abstract = "The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is one of the most commonly used tests of confrontation naming. The length of the test, particularly when administered to impaired patients, has prompted the derivation of several abbreviated forms. Short forms of the BNT have typically been equated in terms of difficulty, but not empirically derived for discriminating between normals and anomic patients. Furthermore, most reports to date have been limited in sample size and generalizability. The present study examined BNT data from a total of 1,044 subjects, including 719 normals and 325 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Scores were calculated for the entire 60-item version as well as for eight previously reported short forms. The scores were examined for the effects of age, education, and gender, as well as for the ability of each form to discriminate between AD patients and normals. There was a significant effect of age, education, and gender on all previously published forms, and the short forms varied in their ability to discriminate between patients and controls. A stepwise discriminant analysis was conducted to empirically derive a new, gender-neutral short form with discriminability comparable to the full 60-item test. Norms from this sample on the empirically derived short form are reported. Copyright (C) 1999 National Academy of Neuropsychology.",
author = "Lansing, {Amy E.} and Ivnik, {Robert J.} and Cullum, {C. Munro} and Christopher Randolph",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0887-6177(98)00022-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "481--487",
journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",
issn = "0887-6177",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirically derived short form of the Boston Naming Test

AU - Lansing, Amy E.

AU - Ivnik, Robert J.

AU - Cullum, C. Munro

AU - Randolph, Christopher

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is one of the most commonly used tests of confrontation naming. The length of the test, particularly when administered to impaired patients, has prompted the derivation of several abbreviated forms. Short forms of the BNT have typically been equated in terms of difficulty, but not empirically derived for discriminating between normals and anomic patients. Furthermore, most reports to date have been limited in sample size and generalizability. The present study examined BNT data from a total of 1,044 subjects, including 719 normals and 325 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Scores were calculated for the entire 60-item version as well as for eight previously reported short forms. The scores were examined for the effects of age, education, and gender, as well as for the ability of each form to discriminate between AD patients and normals. There was a significant effect of age, education, and gender on all previously published forms, and the short forms varied in their ability to discriminate between patients and controls. A stepwise discriminant analysis was conducted to empirically derive a new, gender-neutral short form with discriminability comparable to the full 60-item test. Norms from this sample on the empirically derived short form are reported. Copyright (C) 1999 National Academy of Neuropsychology.

AB - The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is one of the most commonly used tests of confrontation naming. The length of the test, particularly when administered to impaired patients, has prompted the derivation of several abbreviated forms. Short forms of the BNT have typically been equated in terms of difficulty, but not empirically derived for discriminating between normals and anomic patients. Furthermore, most reports to date have been limited in sample size and generalizability. The present study examined BNT data from a total of 1,044 subjects, including 719 normals and 325 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Scores were calculated for the entire 60-item version as well as for eight previously reported short forms. The scores were examined for the effects of age, education, and gender, as well as for the ability of each form to discriminate between AD patients and normals. There was a significant effect of age, education, and gender on all previously published forms, and the short forms varied in their ability to discriminate between patients and controls. A stepwise discriminant analysis was conducted to empirically derive a new, gender-neutral short form with discriminability comparable to the full 60-item test. Norms from this sample on the empirically derived short form are reported. Copyright (C) 1999 National Academy of Neuropsychology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032791137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032791137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0887-6177(98)00022-5

DO - 10.1016/S0887-6177(98)00022-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 14590575

AN - SCOPUS:0032791137

VL - 14

SP - 481

EP - 487

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

SN - 0887-6177

IS - 6

ER -