An end-user's guide to the HEART score and pathway

Brit Long, Joshua Oliver, Matthew Streitz, Alex Koyfman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Chest pain accounts for a significant percentage of emergency department (ED) presentations. The HEART score and pathway have demonstrated an ability to appropriately risk stratify and discharge from the ED a significant proportion of patients. Objective: This review evaluates vital components of the HEART score and pathway, while discussing important considerations for current and future use. Discussion: Chest pain is a common ED presentation, and several conditions associated with chest pain result in patient morbidity and mortality. One major disease is acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite the fear associated with this disease, it accounts for a minority of patients with chest pain in the ED. Emergency physicians rarely miss myocardial infarction (MI) or ACS, with miss rates. <. 1%. Many have sought a score and pathway that allow physicians to safely and reliably risk stratify patients. The HEART score and pathway have revolutionized chest pain evaluation, as they can risk stratify a significant number of patients accurately into separate categories based on history, electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin, age, and risk factors while displaying high sensitivity for MACE. Several intricacies must be considered in the use of this score including risk factors, ECG, troponin, age, history, gestalt, follow up, borderline score, and shared decision making. The HEART pathway can supplement clinician decision making. Conclusions: Appropriate use of the HEART pathway reliably risk stratifies patients. Physicians must consider several key components when utilizing the HEART pathway, and future directions may incorporate other patient factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 12 2017

Fingerprint

Chest Pain
Hospital Emergency Service
Troponin
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Physicians
Decision Making
Electrocardiography
History
Aptitude
Age Factors
Fear
Emergencies
Myocardial Infarction
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • Chest pain
  • HEART
  • Pathway
  • Risk
  • Score
  • Shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

An end-user's guide to the HEART score and pathway. / Long, Brit; Oliver, Joshua; Streitz, Matthew; Koyfman, Alex.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b22b22557b8410296714c58008b7eb3,
title = "An end-user's guide to the HEART score and pathway",
abstract = "Background: Chest pain accounts for a significant percentage of emergency department (ED) presentations. The HEART score and pathway have demonstrated an ability to appropriately risk stratify and discharge from the ED a significant proportion of patients. Objective: This review evaluates vital components of the HEART score and pathway, while discussing important considerations for current and future use. Discussion: Chest pain is a common ED presentation, and several conditions associated with chest pain result in patient morbidity and mortality. One major disease is acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite the fear associated with this disease, it accounts for a minority of patients with chest pain in the ED. Emergency physicians rarely miss myocardial infarction (MI) or ACS, with miss rates. <. 1{\%}. Many have sought a score and pathway that allow physicians to safely and reliably risk stratify patients. The HEART score and pathway have revolutionized chest pain evaluation, as they can risk stratify a significant number of patients accurately into separate categories based on history, electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin, age, and risk factors while displaying high sensitivity for MACE. Several intricacies must be considered in the use of this score including risk factors, ECG, troponin, age, history, gestalt, follow up, borderline score, and shared decision making. The HEART pathway can supplement clinician decision making. Conclusions: Appropriate use of the HEART pathway reliably risk stratifies patients. Physicians must consider several key components when utilizing the HEART pathway, and future directions may incorporate other patient factors.",
keywords = "Chest pain, HEART, Pathway, Risk, Score, Shared decision making",
author = "Brit Long and Joshua Oliver and Matthew Streitz and Alex Koyfman",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.047",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An end-user's guide to the HEART score and pathway

AU - Long, Brit

AU - Oliver, Joshua

AU - Streitz, Matthew

AU - Koyfman, Alex

PY - 2017/2/12

Y1 - 2017/2/12

N2 - Background: Chest pain accounts for a significant percentage of emergency department (ED) presentations. The HEART score and pathway have demonstrated an ability to appropriately risk stratify and discharge from the ED a significant proportion of patients. Objective: This review evaluates vital components of the HEART score and pathway, while discussing important considerations for current and future use. Discussion: Chest pain is a common ED presentation, and several conditions associated with chest pain result in patient morbidity and mortality. One major disease is acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite the fear associated with this disease, it accounts for a minority of patients with chest pain in the ED. Emergency physicians rarely miss myocardial infarction (MI) or ACS, with miss rates. <. 1%. Many have sought a score and pathway that allow physicians to safely and reliably risk stratify patients. The HEART score and pathway have revolutionized chest pain evaluation, as they can risk stratify a significant number of patients accurately into separate categories based on history, electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin, age, and risk factors while displaying high sensitivity for MACE. Several intricacies must be considered in the use of this score including risk factors, ECG, troponin, age, history, gestalt, follow up, borderline score, and shared decision making. The HEART pathway can supplement clinician decision making. Conclusions: Appropriate use of the HEART pathway reliably risk stratifies patients. Physicians must consider several key components when utilizing the HEART pathway, and future directions may incorporate other patient factors.

AB - Background: Chest pain accounts for a significant percentage of emergency department (ED) presentations. The HEART score and pathway have demonstrated an ability to appropriately risk stratify and discharge from the ED a significant proportion of patients. Objective: This review evaluates vital components of the HEART score and pathway, while discussing important considerations for current and future use. Discussion: Chest pain is a common ED presentation, and several conditions associated with chest pain result in patient morbidity and mortality. One major disease is acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite the fear associated with this disease, it accounts for a minority of patients with chest pain in the ED. Emergency physicians rarely miss myocardial infarction (MI) or ACS, with miss rates. <. 1%. Many have sought a score and pathway that allow physicians to safely and reliably risk stratify patients. The HEART score and pathway have revolutionized chest pain evaluation, as they can risk stratify a significant number of patients accurately into separate categories based on history, electrocardiogram (ECG), troponin, age, and risk factors while displaying high sensitivity for MACE. Several intricacies must be considered in the use of this score including risk factors, ECG, troponin, age, history, gestalt, follow up, borderline score, and shared decision making. The HEART pathway can supplement clinician decision making. Conclusions: Appropriate use of the HEART pathway reliably risk stratifies patients. Physicians must consider several key components when utilizing the HEART pathway, and future directions may incorporate other patient factors.

KW - Chest pain

KW - HEART

KW - Pathway

KW - Risk

KW - Score

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016773316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016773316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.047

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 28363616

AN - SCOPUS:85016773316

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

ER -