An in vivo histopathological comparison of single and double pulsed modes of a fractionated CO 2 laser

Georgette Oni, Daniel Robbins, Steven Bailey, Spencer A. Brown, Jeffrey M. Kenkel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Studies examining the histopathological changes that occur in human skin following fractional laser treatment have been performed mainly in animals or abdominal tissue prior to abdominoplasty. This study looks at the effect of double pulse fractional CO 2 laser compared to single pulse treatments to assess differences in tissue injury in the face and abdomen. Methods Twelve healthy subjects randomized into two groups, had two 1cm 2 areas (infraumbilical and forehead) treated with the fractional CO 2 laser (Deep Fx, Lumenis). Settings used were 15mJ double pulse, and 30mJ single pulse, 300Hz, 10% density and compared to the historic control of 15 patients treated at 15mJ single pulse [Bailey et al. (2011), Lasers Surg Med 43: 99-107]. Treated sites were biopsied and analyzed with H&E and TUNEL staining to measure width and depth of the microthermal zones (MTZ) of ablation. Results When comparing 15mJ double pulse to single pulse there were significant differences both in depth (abdominal skin, P=0.002 and facial skin, P=0.001) and width (facial skin, P=0.0002) of MTZ. When comparing double pulsing at 15mJ with single pulsing at 30mJ there were significant differences between MTZ depths in the abdomen (P<0.01) but not in either the MTZ depth (P=0.69) or the width in the face (P=0.502). Discussion This study demonstrates the differences between histopathological laser injury patterns in the face compared to the abdomen when single pulsing is used. It also demonstrates that double pulsing at 15mJ is statistically similar to single pulsing at 30mJ in the face. We think this could have ramifications for clinical practice where by double pulsing at lower energies may result in better clinical outcomes than increasing energies or using multiple passes at single pulse. Clinical studies needs to be performed to investigate this further.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-10
Number of pages7
JournalLasers in Surgery and Medicine
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Carbon Monoxide
Lasers
Abdomen
Skin
Abdominoplasty
Forehead
In Situ Nick-End Labeling
Wounds and Injuries
Healthy Volunteers
Staining and Labeling
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • double pulse laser energy
  • fractionated CO laser
  • histopathological laser injury
  • single pulse laser energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

An in vivo histopathological comparison of single and double pulsed modes of a fractionated CO 2 laser. / Oni, Georgette; Robbins, Daniel; Bailey, Steven; Brown, Spencer A.; Kenkel, Jeffrey M.

In: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 4-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oni, Georgette ; Robbins, Daniel ; Bailey, Steven ; Brown, Spencer A. ; Kenkel, Jeffrey M. / An in vivo histopathological comparison of single and double pulsed modes of a fractionated CO 2 laser. In: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 4-10.
@article{bda7e5cb2bc3496b866c4789cf5257c2,
title = "An in vivo histopathological comparison of single and double pulsed modes of a fractionated CO 2 laser",
abstract = "Introduction Studies examining the histopathological changes that occur in human skin following fractional laser treatment have been performed mainly in animals or abdominal tissue prior to abdominoplasty. This study looks at the effect of double pulse fractional CO 2 laser compared to single pulse treatments to assess differences in tissue injury in the face and abdomen. Methods Twelve healthy subjects randomized into two groups, had two 1cm 2 areas (infraumbilical and forehead) treated with the fractional CO 2 laser (Deep Fx, Lumenis). Settings used were 15mJ double pulse, and 30mJ single pulse, 300Hz, 10{\%} density and compared to the historic control of 15 patients treated at 15mJ single pulse [Bailey et al. (2011), Lasers Surg Med 43: 99-107]. Treated sites were biopsied and analyzed with H&E and TUNEL staining to measure width and depth of the microthermal zones (MTZ) of ablation. Results When comparing 15mJ double pulse to single pulse there were significant differences both in depth (abdominal skin, P=0.002 and facial skin, P=0.001) and width (facial skin, P=0.0002) of MTZ. When comparing double pulsing at 15mJ with single pulsing at 30mJ there were significant differences between MTZ depths in the abdomen (P<0.01) but not in either the MTZ depth (P=0.69) or the width in the face (P=0.502). Discussion This study demonstrates the differences between histopathological laser injury patterns in the face compared to the abdomen when single pulsing is used. It also demonstrates that double pulsing at 15mJ is statistically similar to single pulsing at 30mJ in the face. We think this could have ramifications for clinical practice where by double pulsing at lower energies may result in better clinical outcomes than increasing energies or using multiple passes at single pulse. Clinical studies needs to be performed to investigate this further.",
keywords = "double pulse laser energy, fractionated CO laser, histopathological laser injury, single pulse laser energy",
author = "Georgette Oni and Daniel Robbins and Steven Bailey and Brown, {Spencer A.} and Kenkel, {Jeffrey M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lsm.21150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "4--10",
journal = "Lasers in Surgery and Medicine",
issn = "0196-8092",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An in vivo histopathological comparison of single and double pulsed modes of a fractionated CO 2 laser

AU - Oni, Georgette

AU - Robbins, Daniel

AU - Bailey, Steven

AU - Brown, Spencer A.

AU - Kenkel, Jeffrey M.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Introduction Studies examining the histopathological changes that occur in human skin following fractional laser treatment have been performed mainly in animals or abdominal tissue prior to abdominoplasty. This study looks at the effect of double pulse fractional CO 2 laser compared to single pulse treatments to assess differences in tissue injury in the face and abdomen. Methods Twelve healthy subjects randomized into two groups, had two 1cm 2 areas (infraumbilical and forehead) treated with the fractional CO 2 laser (Deep Fx, Lumenis). Settings used were 15mJ double pulse, and 30mJ single pulse, 300Hz, 10% density and compared to the historic control of 15 patients treated at 15mJ single pulse [Bailey et al. (2011), Lasers Surg Med 43: 99-107]. Treated sites were biopsied and analyzed with H&E and TUNEL staining to measure width and depth of the microthermal zones (MTZ) of ablation. Results When comparing 15mJ double pulse to single pulse there were significant differences both in depth (abdominal skin, P=0.002 and facial skin, P=0.001) and width (facial skin, P=0.0002) of MTZ. When comparing double pulsing at 15mJ with single pulsing at 30mJ there were significant differences between MTZ depths in the abdomen (P<0.01) but not in either the MTZ depth (P=0.69) or the width in the face (P=0.502). Discussion This study demonstrates the differences between histopathological laser injury patterns in the face compared to the abdomen when single pulsing is used. It also demonstrates that double pulsing at 15mJ is statistically similar to single pulsing at 30mJ in the face. We think this could have ramifications for clinical practice where by double pulsing at lower energies may result in better clinical outcomes than increasing energies or using multiple passes at single pulse. Clinical studies needs to be performed to investigate this further.

AB - Introduction Studies examining the histopathological changes that occur in human skin following fractional laser treatment have been performed mainly in animals or abdominal tissue prior to abdominoplasty. This study looks at the effect of double pulse fractional CO 2 laser compared to single pulse treatments to assess differences in tissue injury in the face and abdomen. Methods Twelve healthy subjects randomized into two groups, had two 1cm 2 areas (infraumbilical and forehead) treated with the fractional CO 2 laser (Deep Fx, Lumenis). Settings used were 15mJ double pulse, and 30mJ single pulse, 300Hz, 10% density and compared to the historic control of 15 patients treated at 15mJ single pulse [Bailey et al. (2011), Lasers Surg Med 43: 99-107]. Treated sites were biopsied and analyzed with H&E and TUNEL staining to measure width and depth of the microthermal zones (MTZ) of ablation. Results When comparing 15mJ double pulse to single pulse there were significant differences both in depth (abdominal skin, P=0.002 and facial skin, P=0.001) and width (facial skin, P=0.0002) of MTZ. When comparing double pulsing at 15mJ with single pulsing at 30mJ there were significant differences between MTZ depths in the abdomen (P<0.01) but not in either the MTZ depth (P=0.69) or the width in the face (P=0.502). Discussion This study demonstrates the differences between histopathological laser injury patterns in the face compared to the abdomen when single pulsing is used. It also demonstrates that double pulsing at 15mJ is statistically similar to single pulsing at 30mJ in the face. We think this could have ramifications for clinical practice where by double pulsing at lower energies may result in better clinical outcomes than increasing energies or using multiple passes at single pulse. Clinical studies needs to be performed to investigate this further.

KW - double pulse laser energy

KW - fractionated CO laser

KW - histopathological laser injury

KW - single pulse laser energy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855976225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855976225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lsm.21150

DO - 10.1002/lsm.21150

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 4

EP - 10

JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

SN - 0196-8092

IS - 1

ER -