An investigation of reasoning by analogy in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder

Daniel C. Krawczyk, Michelle R. Kandalaft, Nyaz Didehbani, Tandra T. Allen, M. Michelle McClelland, Carol A. Tamminga, Sandra B. Chapman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Relational reasoning ability relies upon by both cognitive and social factors. We compared analogical reasoning performance in healthy controls (HC) to performance in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and individuals with schizophrenia (SZ). The experimental task required participants to find correspondences between drawings of scenes. Participants were asked to infer which item within one scene best matched a relational item within the second scene. We varied relational complexity, presence of distraction, and type of objects in the analogies (living or non-living items). We hypothesized that the cognitive differences present in SZ would reduce relational inferences relative to ASD and HC. We also hypothesized that both SZ and ASD would show lower performance on living item problems relative to HC due to lower social function scores. Overall accuracy was higher for HC relative to SZ, consistent with prior research. Across groups, higher relational complexity reduced analogical responding, as did the presence of non-living items. Separate group analyses revealed that the ASD group was less accurate at making relational inferences in problems that involved mainly non-living items and when distractors were present. The SZ group showed differences in problem type similar to the ASD group. Additionally, we found significant correlations between social cognitive ability and analogical reasoning, particularly for the SZ group. These results indicate that differences in cognitive and social abilities impact the ability to infer analogical correspondences along with numbers of relational elements and types of objects present in the problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number517
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume8
Issue numberAUG
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 20 2014

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Aptitude
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Research
Social Skills

Keywords

  • Analogy
  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Distraction
  • Reasoning
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neurology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

An investigation of reasoning by analogy in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. / Krawczyk, Daniel C.; Kandalaft, Michelle R.; Didehbani, Nyaz; Allen, Tandra T.; McClelland, M. Michelle; Tamminga, Carol A.; Chapman, Sandra B.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8, No. AUG, 517, 20.08.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krawczyk, Daniel C. ; Kandalaft, Michelle R. ; Didehbani, Nyaz ; Allen, Tandra T. ; McClelland, M. Michelle ; Tamminga, Carol A. ; Chapman, Sandra B. / An investigation of reasoning by analogy in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014 ; Vol. 8, No. AUG.
@article{b9061389a1c74fe08b190fdefe0c4d02,
title = "An investigation of reasoning by analogy in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder",
abstract = "Relational reasoning ability relies upon by both cognitive and social factors. We compared analogical reasoning performance in healthy controls (HC) to performance in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and individuals with schizophrenia (SZ). The experimental task required participants to find correspondences between drawings of scenes. Participants were asked to infer which item within one scene best matched a relational item within the second scene. We varied relational complexity, presence of distraction, and type of objects in the analogies (living or non-living items). We hypothesized that the cognitive differences present in SZ would reduce relational inferences relative to ASD and HC. We also hypothesized that both SZ and ASD would show lower performance on living item problems relative to HC due to lower social function scores. Overall accuracy was higher for HC relative to SZ, consistent with prior research. Across groups, higher relational complexity reduced analogical responding, as did the presence of non-living items. Separate group analyses revealed that the ASD group was less accurate at making relational inferences in problems that involved mainly non-living items and when distractors were present. The SZ group showed differences in problem type similar to the ASD group. Additionally, we found significant correlations between social cognitive ability and analogical reasoning, particularly for the SZ group. These results indicate that differences in cognitive and social abilities impact the ability to infer analogical correspondences along with numbers of relational elements and types of objects present in the problems.",
keywords = "Analogy, Autism spectrum disorder, Distraction, Reasoning, Schizophrenia",
author = "Krawczyk, {Daniel C.} and Kandalaft, {Michelle R.} and Nyaz Didehbani and Allen, {Tandra T.} and McClelland, {M. Michelle} and Tamminga, {Carol A.} and Chapman, {Sandra B.}",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2014.00517",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "AUG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of reasoning by analogy in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder

AU - Krawczyk, Daniel C.

AU - Kandalaft, Michelle R.

AU - Didehbani, Nyaz

AU - Allen, Tandra T.

AU - McClelland, M. Michelle

AU - Tamminga, Carol A.

AU - Chapman, Sandra B.

PY - 2014/8/20

Y1 - 2014/8/20

N2 - Relational reasoning ability relies upon by both cognitive and social factors. We compared analogical reasoning performance in healthy controls (HC) to performance in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and individuals with schizophrenia (SZ). The experimental task required participants to find correspondences between drawings of scenes. Participants were asked to infer which item within one scene best matched a relational item within the second scene. We varied relational complexity, presence of distraction, and type of objects in the analogies (living or non-living items). We hypothesized that the cognitive differences present in SZ would reduce relational inferences relative to ASD and HC. We also hypothesized that both SZ and ASD would show lower performance on living item problems relative to HC due to lower social function scores. Overall accuracy was higher for HC relative to SZ, consistent with prior research. Across groups, higher relational complexity reduced analogical responding, as did the presence of non-living items. Separate group analyses revealed that the ASD group was less accurate at making relational inferences in problems that involved mainly non-living items and when distractors were present. The SZ group showed differences in problem type similar to the ASD group. Additionally, we found significant correlations between social cognitive ability and analogical reasoning, particularly for the SZ group. These results indicate that differences in cognitive and social abilities impact the ability to infer analogical correspondences along with numbers of relational elements and types of objects present in the problems.

AB - Relational reasoning ability relies upon by both cognitive and social factors. We compared analogical reasoning performance in healthy controls (HC) to performance in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and individuals with schizophrenia (SZ). The experimental task required participants to find correspondences between drawings of scenes. Participants were asked to infer which item within one scene best matched a relational item within the second scene. We varied relational complexity, presence of distraction, and type of objects in the analogies (living or non-living items). We hypothesized that the cognitive differences present in SZ would reduce relational inferences relative to ASD and HC. We also hypothesized that both SZ and ASD would show lower performance on living item problems relative to HC due to lower social function scores. Overall accuracy was higher for HC relative to SZ, consistent with prior research. Across groups, higher relational complexity reduced analogical responding, as did the presence of non-living items. Separate group analyses revealed that the ASD group was less accurate at making relational inferences in problems that involved mainly non-living items and when distractors were present. The SZ group showed differences in problem type similar to the ASD group. Additionally, we found significant correlations between social cognitive ability and analogical reasoning, particularly for the SZ group. These results indicate that differences in cognitive and social abilities impact the ability to infer analogical correspondences along with numbers of relational elements and types of objects present in the problems.

KW - Analogy

KW - Autism spectrum disorder

KW - Distraction

KW - Reasoning

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940350831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940350831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00517

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00517

M3 - Article

C2 - 25191240

AN - SCOPUS:84940350831

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

IS - AUG

M1 - 517

ER -