Anatomical and round breast implants: How to select and indications for use

Per Hedén, Paolo Montemurro, William P. Adams, Günter Germann, Michael Scheflan, G. Patrick Maxwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: Choosing between round and anatomical form-stable implants is a key decision in the process of breast augmentation. Anatomical devices have been subject to a number of misconceptions that have limited their use. However, in optimal clinical practice, the benefits and risks of both anatomical and round implants should be considered for any given patient. Patient and surgeon education is fundamental in ensuring that misunderstandings are addressed. The choice between anatomical and round devices should be based on a combination of patient desires, anatomy, and surgical history. This report presents experience-based recommendations on indications and contraindications for each type, and a proposed algorithm for decision making in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-272
Number of pages10
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume136
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Breast Implants
Equipment and Supplies
Patient Education
Anatomy
Breast
History
Surgeons
Clinical Decision-Making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Anatomical and round breast implants : How to select and indications for use. / Hedén, Per; Montemurro, Paolo; Adams, William P.; Germann, Günter; Scheflan, Michael; Maxwell, G. Patrick.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 136, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 263-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hedén, Per ; Montemurro, Paolo ; Adams, William P. ; Germann, Günter ; Scheflan, Michael ; Maxwell, G. Patrick. / Anatomical and round breast implants : How to select and indications for use. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 136, No. 2. pp. 263-272.
@article{03382059b0b34aa9a27dfe781cb5b184,
title = "Anatomical and round breast implants: How to select and indications for use",
abstract = "Summary: Choosing between round and anatomical form-stable implants is a key decision in the process of breast augmentation. Anatomical devices have been subject to a number of misconceptions that have limited their use. However, in optimal clinical practice, the benefits and risks of both anatomical and round implants should be considered for any given patient. Patient and surgeon education is fundamental in ensuring that misunderstandings are addressed. The choice between anatomical and round devices should be based on a combination of patient desires, anatomy, and surgical history. This report presents experience-based recommendations on indications and contraindications for each type, and a proposed algorithm for decision making in clinical practice.",
author = "Per Hed{\'e}n and Paolo Montemurro and Adams, {William P.} and G{\"u}nter Germann and Michael Scheflan and Maxwell, {G. Patrick}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000001474",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "263--272",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anatomical and round breast implants

T2 - How to select and indications for use

AU - Hedén, Per

AU - Montemurro, Paolo

AU - Adams, William P.

AU - Germann, Günter

AU - Scheflan, Michael

AU - Maxwell, G. Patrick

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Summary: Choosing between round and anatomical form-stable implants is a key decision in the process of breast augmentation. Anatomical devices have been subject to a number of misconceptions that have limited their use. However, in optimal clinical practice, the benefits and risks of both anatomical and round implants should be considered for any given patient. Patient and surgeon education is fundamental in ensuring that misunderstandings are addressed. The choice between anatomical and round devices should be based on a combination of patient desires, anatomy, and surgical history. This report presents experience-based recommendations on indications and contraindications for each type, and a proposed algorithm for decision making in clinical practice.

AB - Summary: Choosing between round and anatomical form-stable implants is a key decision in the process of breast augmentation. Anatomical devices have been subject to a number of misconceptions that have limited their use. However, in optimal clinical practice, the benefits and risks of both anatomical and round implants should be considered for any given patient. Patient and surgeon education is fundamental in ensuring that misunderstandings are addressed. The choice between anatomical and round devices should be based on a combination of patient desires, anatomy, and surgical history. This report presents experience-based recommendations on indications and contraindications for each type, and a proposed algorithm for decision making in clinical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938334227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938334227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001474

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001474

M3 - Article

C2 - 26218376

AN - SCOPUS:84938334227

VL - 136

SP - 263

EP - 272

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 2

ER -