TY - JOUR
T1 - Aortic valve morphology influences regurgitant volume in aortic regurgitation
T2 - In vivo evaluation
AU - Grayburn, Paul A.
AU - Eichhorn, Eric J.
AU - Eberhart, Robert C.
AU - Bedotto, John B.
AU - Brickner, M. Elizabeth
AU - Taylor, Anne L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Dr Steven Sloan, Bioinstrumentation Resource Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, for construction of the Plexiglas aortic valve templates and flange. We also thank Don Haagen, RCPT, and Arvella Peters for their technical assistance. This work was supported by the American Heart Association Texas Affiliate Grant-in-Aid 886-106, Austin Texas, NIH Clinical Investigator Award HL01545, Bethesda, Maryland, and the Harry S Moss Heart Center, Dallas, Texas.
PY - 1991/1
Y1 - 1991/1
N2 - Study objective - According to the Gorlin hydraulic orifice equation, aortic regurgitation volume can be determined by the regurgitant orifice cross sectional area, diastolic filling period, mean pressure gradient between the aorta and left ventricle, and a constant relating the coefficients of contraction (Cc) and velocity (Cv). This study was performed to determine whether variation in aortic valve morphology affects regurgitant flow volume, Cc and Cv.Design - Four aortic valve templates, modelled after circular, rheumatic, degenerative, and bicuspid lesions, were constructed with equal orifice cross sectional areas in two sizes, 0.2 and 0.7 cm2. These valves were studied in vitro in a flow model of aortic regurgitation, wherein aortic pressure was regulated by varying the height of a column of fluid. Flow, pressure, and velocity were measured, and the coefficient Cc and Cv were calculated from standard equations.Measurements and main results - Regurgitant volume was assessed at diastolic filling periods of 0.5 and 1.0 s and averaged 15% greater for bicuspid and degenerative as compared to circular or rheumatic valve shapes (p=0.0001). This difference was accentuated at the shorter diastolic filling time and higher pressure gradient, such that bicuspid lesions allowed 29% more regurgitant flow across the 0.2 cm2 orifice at fluid height of 120 cm over 0.5 s. This difference in regurgitant volume between valve shapes was due to an increased Cc for the bicuspid and degenerative valve shapes, suggesting that they are more efficient orifices than rheumatic or circular valve shapes.Conclusions - Aortic valve morphology influences regurgitant volume in aortic regurgitation. Specifically, degenerative and bicuspid orifice shapes have a higher contraction coefficient and allow more regurgitant flow than rheumatic or circular orifices at a given driving pressure and diastolic filling time.
AB - Study objective - According to the Gorlin hydraulic orifice equation, aortic regurgitation volume can be determined by the regurgitant orifice cross sectional area, diastolic filling period, mean pressure gradient between the aorta and left ventricle, and a constant relating the coefficients of contraction (Cc) and velocity (Cv). This study was performed to determine whether variation in aortic valve morphology affects regurgitant flow volume, Cc and Cv.Design - Four aortic valve templates, modelled after circular, rheumatic, degenerative, and bicuspid lesions, were constructed with equal orifice cross sectional areas in two sizes, 0.2 and 0.7 cm2. These valves were studied in vitro in a flow model of aortic regurgitation, wherein aortic pressure was regulated by varying the height of a column of fluid. Flow, pressure, and velocity were measured, and the coefficient Cc and Cv were calculated from standard equations.Measurements and main results - Regurgitant volume was assessed at diastolic filling periods of 0.5 and 1.0 s and averaged 15% greater for bicuspid and degenerative as compared to circular or rheumatic valve shapes (p=0.0001). This difference was accentuated at the shorter diastolic filling time and higher pressure gradient, such that bicuspid lesions allowed 29% more regurgitant flow across the 0.2 cm2 orifice at fluid height of 120 cm over 0.5 s. This difference in regurgitant volume between valve shapes was due to an increased Cc for the bicuspid and degenerative valve shapes, suggesting that they are more efficient orifices than rheumatic or circular valve shapes.Conclusions - Aortic valve morphology influences regurgitant volume in aortic regurgitation. Specifically, degenerative and bicuspid orifice shapes have a higher contraction coefficient and allow more regurgitant flow than rheumatic or circular orifices at a given driving pressure and diastolic filling time.
KW - Aortic insufficiency
KW - Aortic valve morphology
KW - Blood flow velocity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047678382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047678382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/cvr/25.1.73
DO - 10.1093/cvr/25.1.73
M3 - Review article
C2 - 2054834
AN - SCOPUS:85047678382
SN - 0008-6363
VL - 25
SP - 73
EP - 79
JO - Cardiovascular Research
JF - Cardiovascular Research
IS - 1
ER -