Applicants' Perspectives of the Urology Residency Match Process

Roger K. Khouri, Byron D. Joyner, Gary E Lemack

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the competitiveness and high stakes of the urology residency match little research has focused on the application process from the applicants' perspective. Methods: In April 2018 we e-mailed a 23-question multiple-choice survey to all applicants to the 2018 urology residency match. Results: Of the 436 applicants 186 (42.7%) completed our survey. Among the most interesting findings was that most applicants (65.1%) would prefer limiting the number of applications per applicant to 60 or fewer, and the vast majority of applicants (89.8%) would prefer a system where interviews are organized by geographic region to reduce cross-country travel. Most applicants (86.6%) also prefer the January match over the National Resident Matching Program match in March. Conclusions: This study provides applicants' perspectives of the urology residency match process as well as a working framework for improving the application process at the national and individual program levels. Combining these findings with the perspective of the residency program directors should provide the optimal guidance for the structure of the match process going forward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-189
Number of pages5
JournalUrology Practice
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Urology
Internship and Residency
Interviews
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • education
  • graduate
  • internship and residency
  • medical
  • urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Applicants' Perspectives of the Urology Residency Match Process. / Khouri, Roger K.; Joyner, Byron D.; Lemack, Gary E.

In: Urology Practice, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 185-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Khouri, Roger K. ; Joyner, Byron D. ; Lemack, Gary E. / Applicants' Perspectives of the Urology Residency Match Process. In: Urology Practice. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 185-189.
@article{28602606a4b64a4dbf7d08b91659620e,
title = "Applicants' Perspectives of the Urology Residency Match Process",
abstract = "Introduction: Despite the competitiveness and high stakes of the urology residency match little research has focused on the application process from the applicants' perspective. Methods: In April 2018 we e-mailed a 23-question multiple-choice survey to all applicants to the 2018 urology residency match. Results: Of the 436 applicants 186 (42.7{\%}) completed our survey. Among the most interesting findings was that most applicants (65.1{\%}) would prefer limiting the number of applications per applicant to 60 or fewer, and the vast majority of applicants (89.8{\%}) would prefer a system where interviews are organized by geographic region to reduce cross-country travel. Most applicants (86.6{\%}) also prefer the January match over the National Resident Matching Program match in March. Conclusions: This study provides applicants' perspectives of the urology residency match process as well as a working framework for improving the application process at the national and individual program levels. Combining these findings with the perspective of the residency program directors should provide the optimal guidance for the structure of the match process going forward.",
keywords = "education, graduate, internship and residency, medical, urology",
author = "Khouri, {Roger K.} and Joyner, {Byron D.} and Lemack, {Gary E}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urpr.2018.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "185--189",
journal = "Urology Practice",
issn = "2352-0779",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applicants' Perspectives of the Urology Residency Match Process

AU - Khouri, Roger K.

AU - Joyner, Byron D.

AU - Lemack, Gary E

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Introduction: Despite the competitiveness and high stakes of the urology residency match little research has focused on the application process from the applicants' perspective. Methods: In April 2018 we e-mailed a 23-question multiple-choice survey to all applicants to the 2018 urology residency match. Results: Of the 436 applicants 186 (42.7%) completed our survey. Among the most interesting findings was that most applicants (65.1%) would prefer limiting the number of applications per applicant to 60 or fewer, and the vast majority of applicants (89.8%) would prefer a system where interviews are organized by geographic region to reduce cross-country travel. Most applicants (86.6%) also prefer the January match over the National Resident Matching Program match in March. Conclusions: This study provides applicants' perspectives of the urology residency match process as well as a working framework for improving the application process at the national and individual program levels. Combining these findings with the perspective of the residency program directors should provide the optimal guidance for the structure of the match process going forward.

AB - Introduction: Despite the competitiveness and high stakes of the urology residency match little research has focused on the application process from the applicants' perspective. Methods: In April 2018 we e-mailed a 23-question multiple-choice survey to all applicants to the 2018 urology residency match. Results: Of the 436 applicants 186 (42.7%) completed our survey. Among the most interesting findings was that most applicants (65.1%) would prefer limiting the number of applications per applicant to 60 or fewer, and the vast majority of applicants (89.8%) would prefer a system where interviews are organized by geographic region to reduce cross-country travel. Most applicants (86.6%) also prefer the January match over the National Resident Matching Program match in March. Conclusions: This study provides applicants' perspectives of the urology residency match process as well as a working framework for improving the application process at the national and individual program levels. Combining these findings with the perspective of the residency program directors should provide the optimal guidance for the structure of the match process going forward.

KW - education

KW - graduate

KW - internship and residency

KW - medical

KW - urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070371380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070371380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urpr.2018.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.urpr.2018.08.003

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85070371380

VL - 6

SP - 185

EP - 189

JO - Urology Practice

JF - Urology Practice

SN - 2352-0779

IS - 3

ER -