Appropriateness of patients transferred with orthopedic injuries: experience of a level I trauma center

Robert S. O’Connell, Emanuel C. Haug, Pramote Malasitt, Satya Mallu, Jibanananda Satpathy, Jonathan Isaacs, Varatharaj Mounasamy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Trauma patients are frequently transferred to a higher level of care for specialized orthopedic care. Many of these transfers are not necessary and waste valuable resources. The purpose of this study was to quantify our own experience and to assess the appropriateness of orthopedic transfers to a level I trauma center emergency department. Methods: A retrospective review of orthopedic emergency department transfers to a level I trauma center was performed. Data collected included time of transfer, injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, race, orthopedic coverage at transfer institution, and insurance status. Two orthopedic trauma surgeons graded the appropriateness of transfer. A weighted logistic regression model was used to compare dependent and independent variables. Results: A total of 324 patient transfers were reviewed; 65 (20.1%) of them were graded as inappropriate. There was no statistically significant relationship between appropriateness of transfer and age, availability of orthopedic coverage, night/weekend transfer, or insurance status. Regression analysis showed that only ISS (OR 1.130, p = .008) and “polytrauma” (OR 25.39, p < .0001) designation were associated with increased odds ratio of appropriate transfer. The kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between the two raters was 0.505 (95% CI, 0.388–0.623) reflecting moderate agreement. Conclusion: Inappropriate transfers create a significant medical burden to our health care system using valuable resources. Our study found similar results of inappropriate transfers compared to previous studies. However, we did not find a relationship between insurance status or nights/weekends and transfer appropriateness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-554
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Orthopedics
Insurance Coverage
Wounds and Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Hospital Emergency Service
Logistic Models
Patient Transfer
Multiple Trauma
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Appropriateness
  • Transfer
  • Trauma center

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Appropriateness of patients transferred with orthopedic injuries : experience of a level I trauma center. / O’Connell, Robert S.; Haug, Emanuel C.; Malasitt, Pramote; Mallu, Satya; Satpathy, Jibanananda; Isaacs, Jonathan; Mounasamy, Varatharaj.

In: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.05.2018, p. 551-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O’Connell, Robert S. ; Haug, Emanuel C. ; Malasitt, Pramote ; Mallu, Satya ; Satpathy, Jibanananda ; Isaacs, Jonathan ; Mounasamy, Varatharaj. / Appropriateness of patients transferred with orthopedic injuries : experience of a level I trauma center. In: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 551-554.
@article{241beaee6fb84ab5be7c43e03878e9ef,
title = "Appropriateness of patients transferred with orthopedic injuries: experience of a level I trauma center",
abstract = "Background: Trauma patients are frequently transferred to a higher level of care for specialized orthopedic care. Many of these transfers are not necessary and waste valuable resources. The purpose of this study was to quantify our own experience and to assess the appropriateness of orthopedic transfers to a level I trauma center emergency department. Methods: A retrospective review of orthopedic emergency department transfers to a level I trauma center was performed. Data collected included time of transfer, injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, race, orthopedic coverage at transfer institution, and insurance status. Two orthopedic trauma surgeons graded the appropriateness of transfer. A weighted logistic regression model was used to compare dependent and independent variables. Results: A total of 324 patient transfers were reviewed; 65 (20.1{\%}) of them were graded as inappropriate. There was no statistically significant relationship between appropriateness of transfer and age, availability of orthopedic coverage, night/weekend transfer, or insurance status. Regression analysis showed that only ISS (OR 1.130, p = .008) and “polytrauma” (OR 25.39, p < .0001) designation were associated with increased odds ratio of appropriate transfer. The kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between the two raters was 0.505 (95{\%} CI, 0.388–0.623) reflecting moderate agreement. Conclusion: Inappropriate transfers create a significant medical burden to our health care system using valuable resources. Our study found similar results of inappropriate transfers compared to previous studies. However, we did not find a relationship between insurance status or nights/weekends and transfer appropriateness.",
keywords = "Appropriateness, Transfer, Trauma center",
author = "O’Connell, {Robert S.} and Haug, {Emanuel C.} and Pramote Malasitt and Satya Mallu and Jibanananda Satpathy and Jonathan Isaacs and Varatharaj Mounasamy",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00590-018-2134-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "551--554",
journal = "European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology",
issn = "0948-4817",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appropriateness of patients transferred with orthopedic injuries

T2 - experience of a level I trauma center

AU - O’Connell, Robert S.

AU - Haug, Emanuel C.

AU - Malasitt, Pramote

AU - Mallu, Satya

AU - Satpathy, Jibanananda

AU - Isaacs, Jonathan

AU - Mounasamy, Varatharaj

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Background: Trauma patients are frequently transferred to a higher level of care for specialized orthopedic care. Many of these transfers are not necessary and waste valuable resources. The purpose of this study was to quantify our own experience and to assess the appropriateness of orthopedic transfers to a level I trauma center emergency department. Methods: A retrospective review of orthopedic emergency department transfers to a level I trauma center was performed. Data collected included time of transfer, injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, race, orthopedic coverage at transfer institution, and insurance status. Two orthopedic trauma surgeons graded the appropriateness of transfer. A weighted logistic regression model was used to compare dependent and independent variables. Results: A total of 324 patient transfers were reviewed; 65 (20.1%) of them were graded as inappropriate. There was no statistically significant relationship between appropriateness of transfer and age, availability of orthopedic coverage, night/weekend transfer, or insurance status. Regression analysis showed that only ISS (OR 1.130, p = .008) and “polytrauma” (OR 25.39, p < .0001) designation were associated with increased odds ratio of appropriate transfer. The kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between the two raters was 0.505 (95% CI, 0.388–0.623) reflecting moderate agreement. Conclusion: Inappropriate transfers create a significant medical burden to our health care system using valuable resources. Our study found similar results of inappropriate transfers compared to previous studies. However, we did not find a relationship between insurance status or nights/weekends and transfer appropriateness.

AB - Background: Trauma patients are frequently transferred to a higher level of care for specialized orthopedic care. Many of these transfers are not necessary and waste valuable resources. The purpose of this study was to quantify our own experience and to assess the appropriateness of orthopedic transfers to a level I trauma center emergency department. Methods: A retrospective review of orthopedic emergency department transfers to a level I trauma center was performed. Data collected included time of transfer, injury severity score (ISS), age, gender, race, orthopedic coverage at transfer institution, and insurance status. Two orthopedic trauma surgeons graded the appropriateness of transfer. A weighted logistic regression model was used to compare dependent and independent variables. Results: A total of 324 patient transfers were reviewed; 65 (20.1%) of them were graded as inappropriate. There was no statistically significant relationship between appropriateness of transfer and age, availability of orthopedic coverage, night/weekend transfer, or insurance status. Regression analysis showed that only ISS (OR 1.130, p = .008) and “polytrauma” (OR 25.39, p < .0001) designation were associated with increased odds ratio of appropriate transfer. The kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between the two raters was 0.505 (95% CI, 0.388–0.623) reflecting moderate agreement. Conclusion: Inappropriate transfers create a significant medical burden to our health care system using valuable resources. Our study found similar results of inappropriate transfers compared to previous studies. However, we did not find a relationship between insurance status or nights/weekends and transfer appropriateness.

KW - Appropriateness

KW - Transfer

KW - Trauma center

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041112998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041112998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00590-018-2134-x

DO - 10.1007/s00590-018-2134-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 29374803

AN - SCOPUS:85041112998

VL - 28

SP - 551

EP - 554

JO - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology

JF - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology

SN - 0948-4817

IS - 4

ER -