Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. the accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking

Tingjun Hou, Junmei Wang, Youyong Li, Wei Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

373 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In molecular docking, it is challenging to develop a scoring function that is accurate to conduct high-throughput screenings. Most scoring functions implemented in popular docking software packages were developed with many approximations for computational efficiency, which sacrifices the accuracy of prediction. With advanced technology and powerful computational hardware nowadays, it is feasible to use rigorous scoring functions, such as molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) in molecular docking studies. Here, we systematically investigated the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA to identify the correct binding conformations and predict the binding free energies for 98 protein-ligand complexes. Comparison studies showed that MM/GBSA (69.4%) outperformed MM/PBSA (45.5%) and many popular scoring functions to identify the correct binding conformations. Moreover, we found that molecular dynamics simulations are necessary for some systems to identify the correct binding conformations. Based on our results, we proposed the guideline for MM/GBSA to predict the binding conformations. We then tested the performance of MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA to reproduce the binding free energies of the 98 protein-ligand complexes. The best prediction of MM/GBSA model with internal dielectric constant 2.0, produced a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.66, which is better than MM/PBSA (0.49) and almost all scoring functions used in molecular docking. In summary, MM/GBSA performs well for both binding pose predictions and binding free-energy estimations and is efficient to re-score the top-hit poses produced by other less-accurate scoring functions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)866-877
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Computational Chemistry
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2011

Fingerprint

Molecular Mechanics
Molecular mechanics
Docking
Surface area
Ludwig Boltzmann
Ranking
Siméon Denis Poisson
Scoring
Molecular Docking
Conformation
Conformations
Binding Energy
Free energy
Free Energy
Prediction
Ligands
High-throughput Screening
Proteins
Protein
Predict

Keywords

  • binding free energy
  • generalized Born
  • MM/GBSA
  • MM/PBSA
  • molecular docking
  • Poisson Boltzmann

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Computational Mathematics

Cite this

@article{4f0eeba4694a4471b3e22b6fdfe5cc71,
title = "Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. the accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking",
abstract = "In molecular docking, it is challenging to develop a scoring function that is accurate to conduct high-throughput screenings. Most scoring functions implemented in popular docking software packages were developed with many approximations for computational efficiency, which sacrifices the accuracy of prediction. With advanced technology and powerful computational hardware nowadays, it is feasible to use rigorous scoring functions, such as molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) in molecular docking studies. Here, we systematically investigated the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA to identify the correct binding conformations and predict the binding free energies for 98 protein-ligand complexes. Comparison studies showed that MM/GBSA (69.4{\%}) outperformed MM/PBSA (45.5{\%}) and many popular scoring functions to identify the correct binding conformations. Moreover, we found that molecular dynamics simulations are necessary for some systems to identify the correct binding conformations. Based on our results, we proposed the guideline for MM/GBSA to predict the binding conformations. We then tested the performance of MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA to reproduce the binding free energies of the 98 protein-ligand complexes. The best prediction of MM/GBSA model with internal dielectric constant 2.0, produced a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.66, which is better than MM/PBSA (0.49) and almost all scoring functions used in molecular docking. In summary, MM/GBSA performs well for both binding pose predictions and binding free-energy estimations and is efficient to re-score the top-hit poses produced by other less-accurate scoring functions.",
keywords = "binding free energy, generalized Born, MM/GBSA, MM/PBSA, molecular docking, Poisson Boltzmann",
author = "Tingjun Hou and Junmei Wang and Youyong Li and Wei Wang",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/jcc.21666",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "866--877",
journal = "Journal of Computational Chemistry",
issn = "0192-8651",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. the accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking

AU - Hou, Tingjun

AU - Wang, Junmei

AU - Li, Youyong

AU - Wang, Wei

PY - 2011/4/15

Y1 - 2011/4/15

N2 - In molecular docking, it is challenging to develop a scoring function that is accurate to conduct high-throughput screenings. Most scoring functions implemented in popular docking software packages were developed with many approximations for computational efficiency, which sacrifices the accuracy of prediction. With advanced technology and powerful computational hardware nowadays, it is feasible to use rigorous scoring functions, such as molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) in molecular docking studies. Here, we systematically investigated the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA to identify the correct binding conformations and predict the binding free energies for 98 protein-ligand complexes. Comparison studies showed that MM/GBSA (69.4%) outperformed MM/PBSA (45.5%) and many popular scoring functions to identify the correct binding conformations. Moreover, we found that molecular dynamics simulations are necessary for some systems to identify the correct binding conformations. Based on our results, we proposed the guideline for MM/GBSA to predict the binding conformations. We then tested the performance of MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA to reproduce the binding free energies of the 98 protein-ligand complexes. The best prediction of MM/GBSA model with internal dielectric constant 2.0, produced a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.66, which is better than MM/PBSA (0.49) and almost all scoring functions used in molecular docking. In summary, MM/GBSA performs well for both binding pose predictions and binding free-energy estimations and is efficient to re-score the top-hit poses produced by other less-accurate scoring functions.

AB - In molecular docking, it is challenging to develop a scoring function that is accurate to conduct high-throughput screenings. Most scoring functions implemented in popular docking software packages were developed with many approximations for computational efficiency, which sacrifices the accuracy of prediction. With advanced technology and powerful computational hardware nowadays, it is feasible to use rigorous scoring functions, such as molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) in molecular docking studies. Here, we systematically investigated the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA to identify the correct binding conformations and predict the binding free energies for 98 protein-ligand complexes. Comparison studies showed that MM/GBSA (69.4%) outperformed MM/PBSA (45.5%) and many popular scoring functions to identify the correct binding conformations. Moreover, we found that molecular dynamics simulations are necessary for some systems to identify the correct binding conformations. Based on our results, we proposed the guideline for MM/GBSA to predict the binding conformations. We then tested the performance of MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA to reproduce the binding free energies of the 98 protein-ligand complexes. The best prediction of MM/GBSA model with internal dielectric constant 2.0, produced a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.66, which is better than MM/PBSA (0.49) and almost all scoring functions used in molecular docking. In summary, MM/GBSA performs well for both binding pose predictions and binding free-energy estimations and is efficient to re-score the top-hit poses produced by other less-accurate scoring functions.

KW - binding free energy

KW - generalized Born

KW - MM/GBSA

KW - MM/PBSA

KW - molecular docking

KW - Poisson Boltzmann

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951996670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951996670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcc.21666

DO - 10.1002/jcc.21666

M3 - Article

C2 - 20949517

AN - SCOPUS:79951996670

VL - 32

SP - 866

EP - 877

JO - Journal of Computational Chemistry

JF - Journal of Computational Chemistry

SN - 0192-8651

IS - 5

ER -