Assessing Trustworthiness in Research: A Pilot Study on CV Verification

Trisha Phillips, R. Kyle Saunders, Jeralynn Cossman, Elizabeth Heitman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When scholars express concern about trust in science, they often focus on whether the public trusts research findings. This study explores a different dimension of trust and examines whether and how frequently researchers misrepresent their research accomplishments when applying for a faculty position. We collected all of the vitae submitted for faculty positions at a large research university for 1 year and reviewed a 10% sample for accuracy. Of the 180 applicants whose vitae we analyzed, 141 (78%) claimed to have at least one publication, and 79 of these 141 (56%) listed at least one publication that was unverifiable or inaccurate in a self-promoting way. We discuss the nature and implications of our findings, and suggest best practices for both applicants and search committees in presenting and reviewing vitae.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

trustworthiness
applicant
Publications
Research
Practice Guidelines
best practice
Research Personnel
university
science

Keywords

  • curriculum vitae (CV)
  • detrimental research practices
  • faculty recruitment
  • misconduct
  • questionable research practices
  • research ethics
  • research integrity
  • trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Communication
  • Law

Cite this

Assessing Trustworthiness in Research : A Pilot Study on CV Verification. / Phillips, Trisha; Saunders, R. Kyle; Cossman, Jeralynn; Heitman, Elizabeth.

In: Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ef57c738e2a4373b66eca8737029eba,
title = "Assessing Trustworthiness in Research: A Pilot Study on CV Verification",
abstract = "When scholars express concern about trust in science, they often focus on whether the public trusts research findings. This study explores a different dimension of trust and examines whether and how frequently researchers misrepresent their research accomplishments when applying for a faculty position. We collected all of the vitae submitted for faculty positions at a large research university for 1 year and reviewed a 10{\%} sample for accuracy. Of the 180 applicants whose vitae we analyzed, 141 (78{\%}) claimed to have at least one publication, and 79 of these 141 (56{\%}) listed at least one publication that was unverifiable or inaccurate in a self-promoting way. We discuss the nature and implications of our findings, and suggest best practices for both applicants and search committees in presenting and reviewing vitae.",
keywords = "curriculum vitae (CV), detrimental research practices, faculty recruitment, misconduct, questionable research practices, research ethics, research integrity, trust",
author = "Trisha Phillips and Saunders, {R. Kyle} and Jeralynn Cossman and Elizabeth Heitman",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1556264619857843",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics",
issn = "1556-2646",
publisher = "University of California Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Trustworthiness in Research

T2 - A Pilot Study on CV Verification

AU - Phillips, Trisha

AU - Saunders, R. Kyle

AU - Cossman, Jeralynn

AU - Heitman, Elizabeth

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - When scholars express concern about trust in science, they often focus on whether the public trusts research findings. This study explores a different dimension of trust and examines whether and how frequently researchers misrepresent their research accomplishments when applying for a faculty position. We collected all of the vitae submitted for faculty positions at a large research university for 1 year and reviewed a 10% sample for accuracy. Of the 180 applicants whose vitae we analyzed, 141 (78%) claimed to have at least one publication, and 79 of these 141 (56%) listed at least one publication that was unverifiable or inaccurate in a self-promoting way. We discuss the nature and implications of our findings, and suggest best practices for both applicants and search committees in presenting and reviewing vitae.

AB - When scholars express concern about trust in science, they often focus on whether the public trusts research findings. This study explores a different dimension of trust and examines whether and how frequently researchers misrepresent their research accomplishments when applying for a faculty position. We collected all of the vitae submitted for faculty positions at a large research university for 1 year and reviewed a 10% sample for accuracy. Of the 180 applicants whose vitae we analyzed, 141 (78%) claimed to have at least one publication, and 79 of these 141 (56%) listed at least one publication that was unverifiable or inaccurate in a self-promoting way. We discuss the nature and implications of our findings, and suggest best practices for both applicants and search committees in presenting and reviewing vitae.

KW - curriculum vitae (CV)

KW - detrimental research practices

KW - faculty recruitment

KW - misconduct

KW - questionable research practices

KW - research ethics

KW - research integrity

KW - trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068991671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068991671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1556264619857843

DO - 10.1177/1556264619857843

M3 - Article

C2 - 31291795

AN - SCOPUS:85068991671

JO - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

JF - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

SN - 1556-2646

ER -