Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics

Kimberli Taylor-Clarke, Queen Henry-Okafor, Clare Murphy, Madeline Keyes, Russell Rothman, Andre Churchwell, George A. Mensah, Douglas Sawyer, Uchechukwu K.A. Sampson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is an established independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. Approximately 90 million Americans have limited HL and read at the fifth grade level or lower. Therefore, we sought to determine the suitability and readability level of common cardiovascular patient education materials (PEM) related to heart failure and heart-healthy lifestyle. METHODS AND RESULTS: The suitability and readability of written PEMs were assessed using the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) and Fry readability formula. The SAM criteria are composed of the following categories: message content, text appearance, visuals, and layout and design. We obtained a convenience sample of 18 English-written cardiovascular PEMs freely available from major health organizations. Two reviewers independently appraised the PEMs. Final suitability scores ranged from 12% to 87%. Readability levels ranged between 3rd and 15th grade level; the average readability level was 8th grade. Ninety-four percent of the PEMs were rated either superior or adequate on text appearance, but 50% or more of the PEMs were rated inadequate on each of the other categories of the SAM criteria. Only 2 (11%) PEMs had the optimum suitability score of 70% or higher and 5th grade or lower readability level suitable for populations with limited HL. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly available cardiovascular PEMs used by some major healthcare institutions are not suitable for the average American patient. The true prevalence of suboptimal PEMs needs to be determined because it potentially negatively impacts optimal healthcare delivery and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)485-494
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012

Fingerprint

Heart Failure
Health Literacy
Education
Text Messaging
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Education
Organizations
Health
Population

Keywords

  • cardiovascular diseases
  • health literacy
  • patient education
  • patient education materials
  • suitability and readability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Taylor-Clarke, K., Henry-Okafor, Q., Murphy, C., Keyes, M., Rothman, R., Churchwell, A., ... Sampson, U. K. A. (2012). Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 27(6), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e318220720c

Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics. / Taylor-Clarke, Kimberli; Henry-Okafor, Queen; Murphy, Clare; Keyes, Madeline; Rothman, Russell; Churchwell, Andre; Mensah, George A.; Sawyer, Douglas; Sampson, Uchechukwu K.A.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Vol. 27, No. 6, 01.11.2012, p. 485-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor-Clarke, K, Henry-Okafor, Q, Murphy, C, Keyes, M, Rothman, R, Churchwell, A, Mensah, GA, Sawyer, D & Sampson, UKA 2012, 'Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics', Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e318220720c
Taylor-Clarke, Kimberli ; Henry-Okafor, Queen ; Murphy, Clare ; Keyes, Madeline ; Rothman, Russell ; Churchwell, Andre ; Mensah, George A. ; Sawyer, Douglas ; Sampson, Uchechukwu K.A. / Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2012 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 485-494.
@article{0e945023c5a14ae18264b453b2dd750f,
title = "Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is an established independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. Approximately 90 million Americans have limited HL and read at the fifth grade level or lower. Therefore, we sought to determine the suitability and readability level of common cardiovascular patient education materials (PEM) related to heart failure and heart-healthy lifestyle. METHODS AND RESULTS: The suitability and readability of written PEMs were assessed using the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) and Fry readability formula. The SAM criteria are composed of the following categories: message content, text appearance, visuals, and layout and design. We obtained a convenience sample of 18 English-written cardiovascular PEMs freely available from major health organizations. Two reviewers independently appraised the PEMs. Final suitability scores ranged from 12{\%} to 87{\%}. Readability levels ranged between 3rd and 15th grade level; the average readability level was 8th grade. Ninety-four percent of the PEMs were rated either superior or adequate on text appearance, but 50{\%} or more of the PEMs were rated inadequate on each of the other categories of the SAM criteria. Only 2 (11{\%}) PEMs had the optimum suitability score of 70{\%} or higher and 5th grade or lower readability level suitable for populations with limited HL. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly available cardiovascular PEMs used by some major healthcare institutions are not suitable for the average American patient. The true prevalence of suboptimal PEMs needs to be determined because it potentially negatively impacts optimal healthcare delivery and outcomes.",
keywords = "cardiovascular diseases, health literacy, patient education, patient education materials, suitability and readability",
author = "Kimberli Taylor-Clarke and Queen Henry-Okafor and Clare Murphy and Madeline Keyes and Russell Rothman and Andre Churchwell and Mensah, {George A.} and Douglas Sawyer and Sampson, {Uchechukwu K.A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JCN.0b013e318220720c",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "485--494",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing",
issn = "0889-4655",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics

AU - Taylor-Clarke, Kimberli

AU - Henry-Okafor, Queen

AU - Murphy, Clare

AU - Keyes, Madeline

AU - Rothman, Russell

AU - Churchwell, Andre

AU - Mensah, George A.

AU - Sawyer, Douglas

AU - Sampson, Uchechukwu K.A.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is an established independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. Approximately 90 million Americans have limited HL and read at the fifth grade level or lower. Therefore, we sought to determine the suitability and readability level of common cardiovascular patient education materials (PEM) related to heart failure and heart-healthy lifestyle. METHODS AND RESULTS: The suitability and readability of written PEMs were assessed using the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) and Fry readability formula. The SAM criteria are composed of the following categories: message content, text appearance, visuals, and layout and design. We obtained a convenience sample of 18 English-written cardiovascular PEMs freely available from major health organizations. Two reviewers independently appraised the PEMs. Final suitability scores ranged from 12% to 87%. Readability levels ranged between 3rd and 15th grade level; the average readability level was 8th grade. Ninety-four percent of the PEMs were rated either superior or adequate on text appearance, but 50% or more of the PEMs were rated inadequate on each of the other categories of the SAM criteria. Only 2 (11%) PEMs had the optimum suitability score of 70% or higher and 5th grade or lower readability level suitable for populations with limited HL. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly available cardiovascular PEMs used by some major healthcare institutions are not suitable for the average American patient. The true prevalence of suboptimal PEMs needs to be determined because it potentially negatively impacts optimal healthcare delivery and outcomes.

AB - BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is an established independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. Approximately 90 million Americans have limited HL and read at the fifth grade level or lower. Therefore, we sought to determine the suitability and readability level of common cardiovascular patient education materials (PEM) related to heart failure and heart-healthy lifestyle. METHODS AND RESULTS: The suitability and readability of written PEMs were assessed using the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) and Fry readability formula. The SAM criteria are composed of the following categories: message content, text appearance, visuals, and layout and design. We obtained a convenience sample of 18 English-written cardiovascular PEMs freely available from major health organizations. Two reviewers independently appraised the PEMs. Final suitability scores ranged from 12% to 87%. Readability levels ranged between 3rd and 15th grade level; the average readability level was 8th grade. Ninety-four percent of the PEMs were rated either superior or adequate on text appearance, but 50% or more of the PEMs were rated inadequate on each of the other categories of the SAM criteria. Only 2 (11%) PEMs had the optimum suitability score of 70% or higher and 5th grade or lower readability level suitable for populations with limited HL. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly available cardiovascular PEMs used by some major healthcare institutions are not suitable for the average American patient. The true prevalence of suboptimal PEMs needs to be determined because it potentially negatively impacts optimal healthcare delivery and outcomes.

KW - cardiovascular diseases

KW - health literacy

KW - patient education

KW - patient education materials

KW - suitability and readability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867879246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867879246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318220720c

DO - 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318220720c

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 485

EP - 494

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

SN - 0889-4655

IS - 6

ER -