Assessment of compliance in hemodialysis adaptation

Myrl Manley, John Sweeney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research in hemodialysis adaptation has been facilitated by the use of reliable outcome measures such as BUN, K, and interdialysis weight gain. Their use, however, has at times been impressionistic, without reference to the actual range and distribution of those markers in a large population of dialysis patients over a long period of time. This study is a retrospective review to determine that range and distribution at one center. We found the interdialysis weight gains for most patients to be much higher than the levels used in the literature as cut-off points in determining 'non-compliance'. High levels on non-compliance in previous reports may be inflated. Significant correlations among the three biological markers and between each marker and staff assessment of compliance validate the use of inter-dialysis weight gain. Suggestions are made for interpreting such data in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-161
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Compliance
Weight Gain
Renal Dialysis
Dialysis
Blood Urea Nitrogen
Biomarkers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Assessment of compliance in hemodialysis adaptation. / Manley, Myrl; Sweeney, John.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1986, p. 153-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e8fdf4266a645de9b768c99ba38eb99,
title = "Assessment of compliance in hemodialysis adaptation",
abstract = "Research in hemodialysis adaptation has been facilitated by the use of reliable outcome measures such as BUN, K, and interdialysis weight gain. Their use, however, has at times been impressionistic, without reference to the actual range and distribution of those markers in a large population of dialysis patients over a long period of time. This study is a retrospective review to determine that range and distribution at one center. We found the interdialysis weight gains for most patients to be much higher than the levels used in the literature as cut-off points in determining 'non-compliance'. High levels on non-compliance in previous reports may be inflated. Significant correlations among the three biological markers and between each marker and staff assessment of compliance validate the use of inter-dialysis weight gain. Suggestions are made for interpreting such data in the future.",
author = "Myrl Manley and John Sweeney",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1016/0022-3999(86)90045-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "153--161",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of compliance in hemodialysis adaptation

AU - Manley, Myrl

AU - Sweeney, John

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Research in hemodialysis adaptation has been facilitated by the use of reliable outcome measures such as BUN, K, and interdialysis weight gain. Their use, however, has at times been impressionistic, without reference to the actual range and distribution of those markers in a large population of dialysis patients over a long period of time. This study is a retrospective review to determine that range and distribution at one center. We found the interdialysis weight gains for most patients to be much higher than the levels used in the literature as cut-off points in determining 'non-compliance'. High levels on non-compliance in previous reports may be inflated. Significant correlations among the three biological markers and between each marker and staff assessment of compliance validate the use of inter-dialysis weight gain. Suggestions are made for interpreting such data in the future.

AB - Research in hemodialysis adaptation has been facilitated by the use of reliable outcome measures such as BUN, K, and interdialysis weight gain. Their use, however, has at times been impressionistic, without reference to the actual range and distribution of those markers in a large population of dialysis patients over a long period of time. This study is a retrospective review to determine that range and distribution at one center. We found the interdialysis weight gains for most patients to be much higher than the levels used in the literature as cut-off points in determining 'non-compliance'. High levels on non-compliance in previous reports may be inflated. Significant correlations among the three biological markers and between each marker and staff assessment of compliance validate the use of inter-dialysis weight gain. Suggestions are made for interpreting such data in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022651708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022651708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-3999(86)90045-0

DO - 10.1016/0022-3999(86)90045-0

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 153

EP - 161

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

IS - 2

ER -