Associating genes with gene ontology codes using a maximum entropy analysis of biomedical literature

Soumya Raychaudhuri, Jeffrey T. Chang, Patrick D. Sutphin, Russ B. Altman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

148 Scopus citations

Abstract

Functional characterizations of thousands of gene products from many species are described in the published literature. These discussions are extremely valuable for characterizing the functions not only of these gene products, but also of their homologs in other organisms. The Gene Ontology (GO) is an effort to create a controlled terminology for labeling gene functions in a more precise, reliable, computer-readable manner. Currently, the best annotations of gene function with the GO are performed by highly trained biologists who read the literature and select appropriate codes. In this study, we explored the possibility that statistical natural language processing techniques can be used to assign GO codes. We compared three document classification methods (maximum entropy modeling, naïve Bayes classification, and nearest-neighbor classification) to the problem of associating a set of GO codes (for biological process) to literature abstracts and thus to the genes associated with the abstracts. We showed that maximum entropy modeling outperforms the other methods and achieves an accuracy of 72% when ascertaining the function discussed within an abstract. The maximum entropy method provides confidence measures that correlate well with performance. We conclude that statistical methods may be used to assign GO codes and may be useful for the difficult task of reassignment as terminology standards evolve over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-214
Number of pages12
JournalGenome Research
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associating genes with gene ontology codes using a maximum entropy analysis of biomedical literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this